EFTA01371294
EFTA01371295 DataSet-10
EFTA01371296

EFTA01371295.pdf

DataSet-10 1 page 209 words document
V16 P23 P17
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (209 words)
MicrosoftuC 1 (2017-07-27T1S:19:00-0400): awesome. possible downgrade? Microsoftuc (2017-07-27115:19:35-0400): hmmmmm MicrosoftuC: (2017-07-2771S:19:5S-0400): a thought but not sure MicrosoftuC (2017-07-27115:20:06-0400): what if she is still getting something from him Microsoftuc (2017-07-27T1S:20:54-0400): yeah that's a tough one. I don't think we will ever know. I think it will be safer to keep them as high microsoftUC 1 (2017-07-27T1S:21:41-0400): yeah for now at least microsoftuC: (2017-07-27T1S:23:53-0400): hey I have not eaten yet microsoftUC (2017-07-27T1S:24:10-0400): So fro 3:30, I will be gone a few min. MicrosoftUC (2017-07-2771S:24:14-0400): from (2017-07-27115:24:20-0400): Sure thing...go eat! microsoftUC: (2017-07-271'1S:24:2S-0400): lol microsoftUC: m (2017-07-271'1S:24:34-0400): my son's been sleeping all day microsoftUC: (2017-07-27115:24:37-0400): jet leg microsoftuc: (2017-07-27T15:24:39-0400): I will work on the docs and the memo for this account microsoftUc: (2017-07-2771S:24:44-0400): yup microsoftuc (2017-07-27715:25:03-0400): haha thats the reason I would rather go to work. Being home wi inevita y put me to sleep MicrosoftuC: 2017-07-27T15:29:44-0400): hey so quick question - We recently approved Darren K Un y e PLLC, w 0 is an in house lawyer for Epstein, and we downgraded that account to low risk microsoftuC (2017-07-27T1S:30:13-0400): So to maintain consistency, should we also downgrade this one? # Participant MicrosoftUC: left on 2017-07-27T1S:40:13-0400 # End of interaction CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0064601 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00210785 EFTA01371295
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
34bd858e16e6af5af33e5c051c5d5b4f3f7e73d1f7c89276da3c015fac097447
Bates Number
EFTA01371295
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!