EFTA00306061.pdf

PAUL, WEISS, RIFICIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP ALLAN (TEW. W. ABBOTT J. AR A ALAN W. DANIEL J. RAMER FLAMER UNIT 3501. FORTUNE PLAZA OMCE TOWER A BERTH. ATKINS DAVID Stip LI( OMR P. LAMB. 1255 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019-6064 NO. 7 DONS SANHUAN SHOWILY Eitn Y i fi i U lan NlaLJAL sLAR .AN a liN 2. LANGE NIEL J. LEFFELL ICIEDYU GREG UV CHAO YANG DISTRICT J I -FREY 74,4 12 cia. W HE ALL L. BERG TELEPHONE (212) 373-3000 BEIJING 100020 K S. BERGMAN MAYNARD BRIE BIRENSOIM DAVID W. MAYO PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Hk S ERWT e g lIWCIIIININCI LIZABETH R. 14cCOLAI 1TME LLOYD K GARRISON ('540-1001) TELEPHONE 160-1015020.5300 ARK F. MENDEU3OHN RANDOLPH t. PAUL II 540.105110 AllAIKLBRANDS S. MYWAN ON JA ES L. •ROICAN J E. gA SIMON H. RIMINI] (1050-10051 RICHARD! %,„ STEIN CANIEJRI WARADY 411YoUt LOUIS S. WEISS 0927-IPSO) 12TH FLOOR. HONG KONG CLUS BUILDING MID W. H. °CARROLL 3A CHATIR ROAD. CENTRAL PATRICK S. CAMPBELL• JOHN F. WHARTON (1027(1077) HONG KONG 44glW Lew,* V -&IS' R. CLAYTON P_Cels t iffLi. APARICER Root T PARKER• TELEPHONE (5521 2045.300 ykitHils.NCORNISH :4 1ARC LI ED . Olian r d RAN/ANER ALDER CASTLE 10 NOBLE STREET C I TOME§ J. CUMMINGS iitIti% ' lc DAVIS ieW THOMAS g. nk..4 BAWDS III WALTER G CARL L. ROSNER WALTER RIEMAN RICCIARDI WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER RICHARD A. ROSEN LONDON EC2V 7JU. Y.K. ANDREW N ROSENBERG traS j il. OUSIN AAN PETER J. ROTVINSELIG TELEPHONE (44 20) 7307 1000 FUKOKU IMIMEI BUILDING Nit 14.4.8,0;t745 eer1icyL %5AW FAGEN ItArr A KU° JEFFREY DI?. SAFERSTIIN JEFFREY B. SAMUEL0 WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE 2-2 UCHISAIWAICHO 1-CHOME DALE M. SARRO ORAD J. FINKELSTEIN TERRY E. daRIMER CHNODA-KU. TOKYO 1000011. JAPAN KENNETH . SCHNEIDER ROBERT S. SCHUMER TELEPHONE 031-3135574101 JAMES H. SCHWAB Rg(cj5§010 H.ARTI FLUMEN4AUM JOHN M. SCOTT STEPHEN J. SHIMSNAK WRITER'S DIRECT EMAIL ADDRESS TORONTCHOOMINION CENTRE taltD A .VAIgliZs DAVID R 13.1.11.4.11 MANUEL S. FREY NOSES tILVSR AN 77 KING STREET WEST. SUITE 3100 KENNETH A. GALLO RO. B02 220 MICHAEL EsilEITTIMAN IMO/RYIL RYN:11150B itC TORONTO. ONTARIO 115K 113 WiA DWIE174511EMP AuDRA J. SOL Av ROBERT O. GOLDEMUM TARUN M. •MVART TELEPHONE (410) 0040320 trat. 4 14(41r. wmE 2001 K STREET. NW gilt o g itnik."- igg2k534! SWAY ' - ROSIN TARNIFSKY MONICA K. THURMOND WASHINGTON. DC 20006-1047 1101 GROFMAN NAV/ NL T94 II RG NICHOLAS PISA TELEPHONE (2021 2.23-7300 111 UCE.H. G= EA RIINN A MARIA," YULE GAtra.rextpag - CLAUDIA HARMERMAN MW&ISICE G. WEE BEL A. TvZicrifee. October 31, 2011 500 DELAWARE AVENUE. SUITE ZOO POST OFFICE BOX 32 GERARD E. HMT/R ifbaeliftiAl. & .. STEVEN J. WILLIAMS LAWRENCE WITDORCMIC WILMINGTON. DE 1900-0092 JJ yU L WOOD MARK S. WLAZLO A TELEPHONE (302) 035.4410 ficil;h'FITALIT" ROBERTA A. MPIAN KAYE N. YOSHINO TONG YU TRACEY A. .70RIAlg S. KENNEDY t ROBERT CONE OMSK). JR. BY EMAIL ADMITTA0 TO NEW TM IBM Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello (Ret.) Arbitrator, JAMS 620 Eighth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10019 VRF I LLC v. Jeepers, Inc., JAMS Ref. No. 1425006537 Dear Judge Carpinello: On behalf of Claimants Fortress VRF I LLC ("VRF I LLC") and Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC (the "Fund") (and together with VRF I LLC, "Claimants"), we write in response to Your Honor's request for a summary of the dispute that will be the subject of the upcoming mediation before Your Honor this Wednesday November 2, 2011 at 2pm. As discussed further below, only one issue remains to be resolved among all of the parties. That issue concerns the release of Claimants by Third-Party Defendants Daniel B. Zwirn, D.B. Zwim Partners LLC, D.B. Zwirn & Co. L.P., DBZ GP LLC and Zwim Holdings LLC (collectively, the "Zwim Parties"). In Claimants' view, the Zwirn Parties are unfairly seeking to narrow the scope of the release they previously agreed to provide to Claimants. The Current Settlement Agreement As Your Honor may recall, the parties reached an agreement to settle the Arbitration, and entered the terms of this agreement into the record of the Arbitration on July 25, 2011 (the "Current Settlement Agreement"). See Settlement Terms to be Read EFTA00306061 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello (Ret.) 2 into Record (attached as Ex. 1). While the Current Settlement Agreement contemplated a more extensive set of settlement documents, the Current Settlement Agreement, by its express terms, was and currently remains fully binding upon the parties. Id.17. In the more than three months since the parties agreed to the Current Settlement Agreement, the parties have negotiated a more extensive settlement agreement (the "New Agreement"). Numerous issues have been resolved, and all parties to the Current Settlement Agreement, apart from the Zwirn Parties, are ready to sign the attached draft of the New Agreement (Attached as Ex. 2). The Zwim Parties, however, have raised an issue, which remains outstanding, regarding the scope of the releases from the Zwirn Parties to Claimants. To understand that issue, it is necessary to start with the Current Settlement Agreement, which contains the following provisions: 1. This proceeding, and all claims, counterclaims and third-party claims in it shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each Party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees, except to the extent Claimants have any indemnification obligations to any of the Zwim Parties for reasonable attorney's fees and costs in connection with this proceeding (the "Legal Bills"). . . . 6. The Zwirn Parties, on the one hand, and the Claimants, on the other, will exchange releases, including standard language as to releasing affiliates and other related persons,for any claims relating in any way to the matters at issue in thisproceedings except for any claims for breach of this settlement agreement or the payment of the Legal Bills. (Current Settlement Agreement, Ex.1, at 1-2.) (Emphasis added.) Draft New Agreement Consistent with, and faithful to, these provisions of the Current Settlement Agreement, Claimants have included the following language in the proposed New Agreement: Except as provided in Paragraph E of this Section III of the Settlement Agreement, the Zwim Parties, on behalf of themselves and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, each of their past, present and future parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, each of the predecessors, successors and assigns of those entities, and each of the above entities' past, present and future agents, employees, officers, directors, partners, members, EFTA00306062 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello (Ret.) 3 managers, trustees, administrators, supervisors, liquidators, shareholders, representatives, attorneys, auditors, accountants and any and all other individuals or entities who have at any time acted, or purported to act on behalf of any of the foregoing (collectively, the "Zwirn Releasors"), hereby forever, irrevocably and unconditionally release and discharge: (1) except with respect to any indemnification obligations Claimants may have to the Zwim Releasors for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the Arbitration, the Claimants Released Parties from, and covenant not to sue any of the Claimants Released Parties for or with respect to, any and all claims, causes of action, and demands of any nature, character or kind, whatsoever, whether known or unknown, whether at law or equity, and whether of a direct, indirect or derivative nature, which any of the Zwirn Releasors ever had, now have, or ever may have against any of the Claimants Released Parties, which constitute, concern or otherwise relate to: (a) any matter or thing asserted or at issue in, or otherwise relating to, the Arbitration, including but not limited to: (i) all claims, counterclaims and cross-claims that were asserted, or that could have been asserted, in the Arbitration; (ii) all claims relating to the matters at issue in the Arbitration; and (iii) all claims relating to the litigation of the Arbitration, including but not limited to all such claims seeking the recovery of attorneys' fees, costs and other litigation expenses or seeking sanctions of any kind and on whatever grounds, except, for the sake of clarity, with respect to any indemnification obligations Claimants may have to the Zwirn Releasors for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with the Arbitration; or (b) any Additional Agreement, as defined in Section VI.C(2) below. (Draft New Agreement, Ex. 2, at 9.) It is also important to note that similar language is used in other portions of the New Agreement for other releases—including the release of the Zwirn Parties by EFTA00306063 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello (Ret.) 4 Claimants—that was based on release language in the Current Settlement Agreement similar to that governing the release from the Zwim Parties to Claimants. The Zwim Parties' Issue Despite all this, the Zwirn Parties have now decided that the release language contained in the Current Settlement Agreement could be read in a way they now believe is overly broad. As Your Honor may recall, the Zwim Parties are parties to certain agreements with the Fund (containing, among other things, certain indemnification provisions) that were entered into prior to, or in connection with, the transition of management of the Fund from the Zwim Parties to VRF I LLC and affiliates. The Zwim Parties have now expressed a concern that the release language both in the Current Settlement Agreement, and as proposed for the New Agreement, might be read to prevent them from receiving indemnification under their prior agreements with the Fund in the event of a third-party claim brought against them in which certain of the allegations in such a claim were somewhat similar to those asserted by Mr. Epstein (or his company, Jeepers, Inc.) in the Arbitration. Claimants believe the proposed release language for the New Agreement quoted above accurately captures the agreement parties reached at the conclusion of the Arbitration and set forth in the Current Settlement Agreement. They also believe it to be extremely difficult to predict in advance exactly what new third-party claims could be brought against the Zwim Parties, how the pre-Arbitration agreements between the Fund and the Zwirn Parties might (or might not) apply to such claims, and how the currently proposed release language might (or might not) apply to such claims. Therefore, they believe it most appropriate to leave the release language in the proposed New Agreement (quoted above) as is, particularly given that it accurately reflects Parties' Current Settlement Agreement on this point. Nonetheless, in the spirit of compromise and to address the concerns of the Zwirn Parties, Claimants have proposed the following additional language that would immediately follow the release language in the proposed New Agreement quoted above: (2) For the avoidance of doubt, the releases granted by the Zwirn Releasors in this Section III.C(1) are not intended to release the Fund from indemnification obligations, if any, that the Fund would otherwise have to the Zwim Releasors in relation to claims (i) brought solely by third parties not involved in or related in any way to the parties to this Arbitration, (ii) not assigned or otherwise transferred by any of the other of the parties to this Arbitration, and (iii) not arising out of, or related to, the Arbitration or any Additional Agreement. Without any real explanation, and apparently unwilling to abide by their prior agreement in the Current Settlement Agreement on this point, the Zwirn Parties have rejected this language. Instead, they have insisted on proposing language that, EFTA00306064 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP Hon. Anthony J. Carpinello (Ret.) 5 rather than clarifying relevant language of the release language, entirely rewrites it in ways that would sharply curtail the scope of the bargained for release that the Zwirn Parties have already provided to Claimants. Conclusion Claimants believe that either (a) no additional language should be added to the proposed release language for the New Agreement, quoted above, or (b) at most, the clarifying language Claimants have proposed and quoted above is sufficient to address the Zwim Parties' new concerns. Most importantly, Claimants do not believe it appropriate to alter the existing release to their disadvantage merely because the Zwim Parties have reconsidered their position. We look forward to mediating this final issue with you. Respectfully submitted, Enclosures cc: Harry Susman, Esq. John Siffert, Esq. Daniel Reynolds, Esq. William Schwartz, Esq. William O'Brien, Esq. Darren K. Indyke, Esq. James H.R. Windels, Esq. EFTA00306065