📄 Extracted Text (1,215 words)
Date: Seat # (Preclinical):
PROSTHODONTIC Boards Simulation Name:
Skill Assessment: Fixed Partial Denture & Anterior All-Ceramic Crown Preparations
I (SATISFACTORY) II (-5 points) III (-10 points) IV (FAIL)
Prepared Cast Metal Crown Abutment #19
Walls Smooth walls & margins. Slight roughness of walls and/or margins. Poorly defined and moderately rough walls Unfinished and extremely rough walls andr or
& and/or margins. margins
Taper Taper is adequate (6 to 8 2). Taper is <6 degrees or slightly excessive There is no tape or excessive taper (>12.16 Taper is grossly over-reduced (>16 2). or
(>8-129) 2) there is an UNDERCUT
Path of Varies less than 10 degrees from parallel to Deviates 10 degrees to less than 20 Deviates 20 degrees to less than 30 Deviates 30 degrees or more from long axis
Insertion long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth of tooth
The cervical finish line is placed 0.5 mm The cervical finish line is under-extended, up The cervical finish line is over-extended. 0.5 The cervical finish line is over-extended. more
External occlusal to the CEJigingival shroud. to 1 mm above the CEJ/crest of the gingival mm below the CEJfcrest of the gingival than 0.5 mm causing damage. or
shroud. or at the level of the CEJ shroud. or 1-1.5mm occlusal under-extended > 1.5mm
outline
Cervical bevel. when used is 0.5mm to 1mm Cervical bevel, when used is greater than Cervical bevel. when used is less than 0.5mm Cervical bevel. has no continuity or greater
in width and is well-defined lmm but does not exceed 1.5mm. and lacks or greater than 1.5mm. and has poor than 2.0mm
&
some definition definition
Reduction of occlusal wall is optimally The occlusal wall ±.5mm from optimal. Line The occlusal wall ±1mm from optimal. Line The occlusal wall grossly over/under-
Internal
1.5mm. Line angles. Cusp tips rounded angles. Cusp tips not completely rounded angles. Cusp tips minimally rounded reduced: >3mm. <0.5mm. Sharp angles
Form
Sufficient axial tissue removal for The axial walls slightly under/over-reduced The axial walls significantly The axial walls grossly over/under-reduced:
convenience.retenfion &resistance: 1.5mm .5mm from optimal. slightly rough underfover-reduced lmm from optimal. >2.5mm. <0.5mm. Sharp angles
Marginal finish line uniform and adequate Marginal finish line width varies slightly. but Marginal finish line width varies significantly Marginal finish line not present or less than
for restoration design. 0.5mm not more than lmm variation in width but not more than lmm variation .5mm or more than 2.5mm
Prepared Porcelain Fused to Metal Abutment (PFM) #21
Walls Smooth walls & margins. Slight roughness of walls and/Or margins. Poorly defined and moderately rough walls Unfinished and extremely rough walls andr or
& and/or margins. margins
Taper Taper is adequate (6 to 8 2). Taper is <6 degrees or slightly excessive There is no tape or excessive taper (>12.16 Taper is grossly over-reduced (>16 2). or
(>8-129) 2) there is an UNDERCUT
Path of Varies less than 10 degrees from parallel to Deviates 10 degrees to less than 20 Deviates 20 degrees to less than 30 Deviates 30 degrees or more from long axis
Insertion long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth of tooth
The cervical finish line is placed 0.5 mm The cervical finish line is under-extended, up The cervical finish line is over-extended, 0.5 The cervical finish line is over-extended. more
occlusal to the CEJ/gingival shroud to 1 mm above the CEJ/crest of the gingival mm below the CEJfcrest of the gingival than 0.5 mm causing damage. or
External
shroud, or at the level of the CEJ shroud. or 1.1.5mm occlusal under-extended > 1.5mm
outline
Cervical bevel. when used is 0.5mm to 1mm Cervical bevel, when used is greater than Cervical bevel. when used is less than 0.5mm Cervical bevel. has no continuity or greater
in width and is weffdefined (Lingual must be lmm but does not exceed 1.5mm. and lacks or greater than 1.5mm. and has poor than 2.0mm
& prepared for a metal margin) some definition definition
Reduction of occlusal wall is optimally The occlusal wall ±.5mm from optimal. Line The occlusal wall ±1mm from optimal. Line The occlusal wall grossly over/under-
Internal
2mm, Line angles. Cusp tips rounded angles. Cusp tips not completely rounded angles. Cusp tips minimally rounded reduced: >3mm, <0.5mm, Sharp angles
Form
Sufficient axial tissue removal for The axial walls slightly under/over-reduced The axial walls significantly The axial walls grossly over/under-reduced:
convenience.retenfion &resistance: 1.5mm .5mm from optimal. slightly rough underfover-reduced lmm from optimal. >2.5mm. <0.5mm. Sharp angles
Shoulder width uniform and adequate for Shoulder width varies slightly. but not more Shoulder width varies significantly in width Shoulder not present or less than .5mm or
restoratn design. 8:1.5mm,L:lmm&Bevel than .5mm variation but not more than lmm variation more than 2.5mm
Line of draw without rotation. allowing for full Path of insertion requires slight altering to Angulations do not allow seating. Coronal No line of draw, removal of apical 2/3tIs tooth
FPD seating of FPD allow for full seating tooth structure must be removed structure required
EFTA00307757
Date: Seat # (PrecIMIcao:
PROSTHODONTIC Boards Simulation Name:
Skill Assessment: Fixed Partial Denture & Anterior All-Ceramic Crown Preparations
I (SATISFACTORY) II (-5 points) III (-10 points) IV (FAIL)
All -Ceramic Crown #9
Walls Smooth walls & margins. Slight roughness of walls and/or margins. Poorly defined and moderately rough wals Unfinished and extremely rough walls an& or
& and/or margins. margins
Taper Taper is adequate (6 to 8 2). Taper is <6 degrees or slightly excessive There is no tape or excessive taper (>12-16 Taper is grossly over•reduced (>16 2), or
(>8-122) 2) there is an UNDERCUT
Path of Varies less than 10 degrees from parallel to Deviates 10 degrees to less than 20 Deviates 20 degrees to less than 30 Deviates 30 degrees or more from long axis
Insertion long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth degrees from long axis of tooth of tooth
External The cervical finish line is placed 0.5 mm The cervical finish line is under•extended, up The cervical finish line is over-extended. 0.5 The cervical finish line is over-extended. more
outline occlusal to the CEJ/gingival shroud to 1 mm above the CEJ/crest of the gingival mm below the CEJ/crest of the gingival than 0.5 mm causing damage, or
shroud, or at the level of the CEJ shroud, or 1.1.5mm occlusal under-extended > 1.5mm
& Lingual wall height is optimally 2mm Line angles not completely rounded Lingual wall height is less than 1.5mm. Lingual wall height is less than 1.0mm
Marginal Ridge not reduced sufficiently Line angles minimally rounded Cervical Margin is beveled. Sharp angles
Internal Optimal Incisal reduction Is 2.0mm, The incisal reduction over/under•reduced: The incisal reduction over/under•reduced: The incisal reduction grossly
Form Line angles rounded not >2.5mm, or <1.5mm >3.0mm, <1.5mm over/under•reduced: >4mm. <1.0mm
Sufficient axial tissue removal for The axial walls slightly under/over•reduced The axial walls significantly The axial walls grossly over/under•reduced:
convenience,retention &resistance: 1.5mm .5mm from optimal. slightly rough under/over•reduced 1mm from optimal, >3.5mm, <0.5mm, Sharp angles
Cervical margin uniform and adequate for Cervical margin width is greater than 1mm Cervical margin width is greater than Cervical margin width is greater than
restoration design, lmm Shouldr/Chamfr but does not exceed 1.5mm 1.5mm, or less than 1.0mm 2.0mm. or less than 0.5mm
EFTA00307758
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
352d464048a3d44ad3afa650ac6ec769f6ae188409b035954b6a4cc1761817d4
Bates Number
EFTA00307757
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0