podesta_email_01795.txt

podesta-emails 5,839 words email

P17 D6 V16 V11 P22

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *[image: Inline image 1]* *Correct The Record Wednesday July 30, 2014 Morning Roundup:* *Headlines:* *Slate: “Ready for Anything” <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/07/david_brock_s_correct_the_record_the_former_right_wing_operative_is_hillary.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top>* [Subtitle:] “David Brock’s super PAC network is fending off every attack on Hillary Clinton. The book tour is barely the end of Round 1.” *MSNBC: “Clinton welcomes ‘healthy’ Democratic primary contest” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-welcomes-healthy-democratic-primary-challenger>* “Hillary Clinton may be the prohibitive, if undeclared, frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, but she still thinks it’d be ‘healthy’ for the party to have a contested primary, she said Tuesday.” *Blue Nation Review: Hillary’s a Flip Flopper? Nah, That’s Just GOP Drivel <http://bluenationreview.com/hillary-flip-flopper-much-rnc/>* "And see, that’s the beauty of rancid political institutions like the RNC. They’re in the business of tearing people down, people like former First Lady and Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, private citizens like Hillary Clinton. That’s what the RNC is really really good at: tearing people down." *Media Matters for America: “Right-Wing Media Distort Hillary Clinton's Comments To Falsely Claim She Endorsed Hamas” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/07/29/right-wing-media-distort-hillary-clintons-comme/200247>* “Right-wing media selectively edited comments made by Hillary Clinton to falsely accuse her of endorsing Hamas' extremist tactics. But Clinton made clear that Israel has a right to defend itself and credited its measures to decrease civilian casualties.” *Fusion: “Hillary Clinton thinks the Cuban embargo has been a failure” <http://fusion.net/Leadership/video/hillary-clinton-thinks-cuban-embargo-failure-905215>* “Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Fusion's Jorge Ramos that the she thinks the Cuban embargo has been a failure.” *Tampa Bay Times (F.L.) blog: The Buzz: “Hillary Clinton: End the Cuban embargo” <http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/hillary-clinton-end-the-cuban-embargo/2190577>* “Hillary Clinton, in an interview with Fusion airing tonight, repeats her call to end the Cuban embargo.” *Politico: “Hillary Clinton: Redskins name ‘insensitive’” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/hillary-clinton-washington-redskins-name-change-109529.html>* “Hillary Clinton says the Washington Redskins need a name change.” *RIGHT WING ATTACK DU JOUR: RECORD WILL BE CORRECTED* *Washington Examiner: “State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches, controversial consulting deal worth $48m; Hillary Clinton's COS copied on all decisions” <http://washingtonexaminer.com/state-department-approved-215-bill-clinton-speeches-controversial-consulting-deal-worth-48m/article/2551428>* “A joint investigation by the Washington Examiner and the nonprofit watchdog group Judicial Watch found that former President Clinton gave 215 speeches and earned $48 million while his wife presided over U.S. foreign policy" *Mother Jones: “Quote of the Day: ‘The Press Loves to Cover Her Hard’” <http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/07/quote-day-press-loves-cover-her-hard>* “The press has never liked Hillary, and she's never liked them, and that's that. If she decides to run for president, this is going to be one of her biggest problems—or maybe her biggest, period.” *Facebook post: Sen. Ted Cruz <https://www.facebook.com/tedcruzpage/posts/10152603151697464>* “Hillary Clinton seems to fundamentally misunderstand the problem. Hamas doesn't put rockets in schools, mosques, hospitals, and homes because ‘Gaza is pretty small.’” *Articles:* *Slate: “Ready for Anything” <http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/07/david_brock_s_correct_the_record_the_former_right_wing_operative_is_hillary.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top>* By David Weigel July 29, 2014, 4:26 p.m. EDT [Subtitle:] David Brock’s super PAC network is fending off every attack on Hillary Clinton. The book tour is barely the end of Round 1. Hillary Clinton’s face looms over the offices of Correct the Record—in a friendly way. The young PR operation’s 18 workers do their typing and designing and debunking next to a blown-up version of that 2011 photo in which the former secretary of state is checking her BlackBerry on a flight from Malta to Tripoli, behind dark sunglasses. That photo inspired the Texts From Hillary Tumblr, and was painted on the Ready for Hillary PAC’s bus before it started schlepping around the country. It’s kitsch from Clinton’s finest hour, from the postelection, pre-Benghazi period when a pundit could call her “a great secretary of state” and hear no coughing or guffawing. A few steps away, past the shelves full of David Brock’s books—his 2002 memoir of the conservative movement he left, and the much less heretical 2012 The Fox Effect—sits American Bridge’s president, Brad Woodhouse. American Bridge is the permanent campaign that’s currently trying to save the election for Democrats. Correct the Record, launched in November 2013, is a subsidiary focused on the next election. Both organizations live to fight Republicans, just as Media Matters—the Brock project from which all of this grew—lives to rebut “conservative misinformation” in the press. But Media Matters and American Bridge respond to everything. Correct the Record has only one mission. In an interview with David Freedlander, Brock said he dreamed up the project after Republicans held hearing after hearing on Benghazi. “There was no, or limited, capacity for her to deal with the range of attacks,” he said, referring to Clinton. In October, Brock co-authored a book titled The Benghazi Hoax, and within weeks Correct the Record was there to insist that “Hillary Clinton was the ‘most on top of the situation’ on the night of the attack.” I dropped by the Brock-verse a few weeks after the release of Clinton’s memoir Hard Choices. The conventional wisdom is that the tour could have gone better—more book sales, fewer verbal somersaults about her wealth and gay marriage stance. Correct the Record wants everyone to know that the media blew it. It had been sending out weekly updates of Clinton book sales, because there was a story out there that she was flopping. The first memo, from July 2, ran to more than 4,000 words, and insisted, “Critics have praised the authenticity and insight of the former Secretary of State’s new memoir” and that “Hard Choices sold more in its third week than Rand Paul and Jeb Bush’s books did total, combined!” (Exclamation point in the original.) Woodhouse wants me to appreciate the long game that CTR is playing. They don’t just do rapid response, though of course they’re “very good” at it. “You can hand people a list of 100 Hillary Clinton accomplishments, or 30, or whatever, from the State Department or her life, and nobody’s even reporting on them,” says Woodhouse, sitting behind his two computer screens and a TV tuned to MSNBC. “They’re reporting on whether she had a gaffe. But one thing Correct the Record is doing is citing and placing a lot of op-eds, putting surrogates out on TV, to talk about her accomplishments. And all that stuff is going to be somewhere for someone to use later on.” Right. It’s not like CTR can force the media to use this material. It can only politely inform the press that it’s falling for right-wing spin. CTR’s own spin has described an attack on the Clintons’ wealth as an attack on the “profoundly American success and philanthropy of Bill and Hillary Clinton,” and criticism of her speaking fees as “relentlessly attacking Hillary Clinton for raising money for universities.” If this came from an actual campaign, reporters would choke on the chutzpah. But it doesn’t. It comes from a small group led by Burns Strider, who happened to be a senior adviser to the 2008 Clinton campaign, and who argues that Clinton’s book tour was an unqualified win. “The great thing about the book tour, from my vantage point, as a guy from Mississippi who’s worked all over the country, is that Secretary Clinton hasn’t gone out with a giant stash of canned answers,” says Strider. “She doesn’t go out with a tested message. She’s talking from answering and reacting to questions. You look at her town hall on CNN, on Charlie Rose, she’s had an incredibly successful couple of months chatting with the American people.” If you gaze too deeply at Correct the Record, you start to wonder if you’ve been too critical of the Clintons. That is by design. The outfit has studiously avoided intrigue and invited plenty of reporters into the inner sanctum. (This piece is at least the third that begins with a tour of the CTR bunker, though each reporter got a different estimate of the total staff—from 16 to 18 to 20.) Strider will even discuss how the organization might fend off attacks if Clinton draws a challenge from the left. “If Clinton chooses to run,” he says, “she’s gonna articulate her record for the future and I’d be very surprised to find it not much in line with her friends from the left.” And Brock is happy to describe what he learned in his wild days as a right-wing hack, and why the facts brought him to liberalism and the defense of the Clintons. In Blinded by the Right, he describes in detail how the right first turned on him when his reporting for a Hillary bio turned out nuanced instead of vitriol. “Back when I wrote The Seduction of Hillary Rodham, I wrote something to the effect that I thought her potential as a political leader was such that she might end up being a more historic figure than her husband,” remembers Brock. “I think the potential is still there. I try to make sure, through our work, that she gets a fair hearing, and that the media environment isn’t clogged with misinformation.” Brock goes through all of the hits on Clinton, and explains why they fizzled—why they were predestined to fizzle. What about the Benghazi attack, the one that led to Correct the Record’s very existence? “The Benghazi issue is almost like birtherism at this point,” says Brock. “I don’t think it’s doing real damage. If it’s a question of where Benghazi sits in the mainstream discourse, it’s largely been contained. I think we had a fair amount to do with that.” How about the Washington Free Beacon’s report that dredged up—with fresh audio—the story of a young Hillary Clinton defending a child rapist? “It was very misleading in the way it was presented, and wrong,” says Brock. “So again, I don’t think … ” He pauses. “It got some attention and broke through to some extent, but when real reporters looked at it, it fizzled.” And what about the current wave of Clinton books? Correct the Record tears through them, but has discovered that they need little rebutting. No one in the mainstream media (excluding Fox News and the New York Post) did much with Ed Klein’s Blood Feud and its mysteriously sourced quasi-scoops. Daniel Halper’s Clinton, Inc., released a month after Hard Choices, was the sort of book a young Brock might have written, with named sources backing up some of the best stories. But it was no real threat to Hillary. “I don’t believe it’s going to succeed as well as other conservative books in the marketplace,” says Brock. “The basic approach he seems to take is that he will give you a page or two of essentially rumor or speculation, that a lot of us who are plugged into the world have heard. Then he backs out of it with various caveats. I think he doesn’t deliver the kind of red meat that an Ed Klein has delivered. The conservative audience—it doesn’t do caveats. And as far as its reach into mainstream conversation, there hasn’t been much pickup. Reporters don’t feel like any new ground has been plowed there at all.” I ping Halper and tell him what Brock thinks of his book. In no time at all, Halper points me to the rules of Clinton PR that he identified in his reporting, and identifies this as No. 3: “make any allegation unfavorable to the Clintons” into “old news.” *MSNBC: “Clinton welcomes ‘healthy’ Democratic primary contest” <http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clinton-welcomes-healthy-democratic-primary-challenger>* By Alex Seitz-Wald July 29, 2014, 2:54 p.m. EDT Hillary Clinton may be the prohibitive, if undeclared, frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, but she still thinks it’d be “healthy” for the party to have a contested primary, she said Tuesday. “I think there will probably be many candidates,” she told Fusion’s Jorge Ramos in an interview. “I’m not sure I’m going to run, but if I do, I think competition is healthy and if people want to get in and want to be in a primary, more power to them.” Clinton added one note of caution, however: “Now, if they come in and they say crazy things, that’s not healthy, but if they say sensible things, of course that’s healthy.” It’s unclear if she had any specific possible challengers in mind. A majority of Democratic voters think Clinton should face a primary challenge in 2016, according to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, while just 28% think the former secretary of state should make it to the convention unopposed, if she decides to run. Clinton is touring the country while promoting her new memoir, “Hard Choices,” about her time at the State Department. In the Ramos interview, Clinton also joined fellow Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Obama in calling on the Washington Redskins football team to change their name. “I think it’s insensitive,” Clinton said, “And I think that there’s no reason for it to continue as the name of a team in our nation’s capital.” She declined, however, to propose alternative names. *Blue Nation Review: Hillary’s a Flip Flopper? Nah, That’s Just GOP Drivel <http://bluenationreview.com/hillary-flip-flopper-much-rnc/>* By Jimmy Williams July 29, 2014 I’ll bet you already knew the Republican National Committee is on a jihad against Hillary Clinton. You’re not shocked by this. If anything, you’re comforted by this because they’ll just re-litigate her husband’s presidency and scream “Benghazi” from now until the Second Coming. But why are you OK with all of this, with “this-gate” and “that-gate” and “their-gate” and “Benghazi-gate?” So many gates that lead to nowhere? The reason you’re OK with all of this is because the more they tear her down, the stronger she becomes. The more they overreach, the more rational she looks. The more delusion the GOP vomits forth, the healthier she actually becomes. And see, that’s the beauty of rancid political institutions like the RNC. They’re in the business of tearing people down, people like former First Lady and Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, private citizens like Hillary Clinton. That’s what the RNC is really really good at: tearing people down. Their latest salvo came yesterday from RNC spokeswoman Izzy Santa, who accused the former Secretary of State of flip flopping on the issue of immigration. Santa said “Hillary Clinton wins today’s flip-flopper award in her latest attempt to hispander. It’s disingenuous for her to change her tune on the 2008 immigration law, within 24 hours, especially when speaking to a Hispanic journalist who serves a large Hispanic viewership. Hillary Clinton’s book tour is revealing she will say just about anything to connect with the American people but her pandering will continue to take its toll on her.” GayPandaI just love the word “hispandering.” It’s so, oh I don’t know, pandering–to the GOP base. It’s a hate-based word. Frankly, if I were the GOP I’d be doing a hell of a lot more pandering. Like maybe to Latinos. And women. And the LGBT community. And the black community. And the Asian community. They could even come up with words for those groups. I personally like Homopandering. While I’ve never met a gay panda, it sure does sound fun right? Or maybe Blackpandering. I remember those Black Panthers from that Forrest Gump movie but hey, maybe they’d be receptive. I don’t know. And then you could have Asianpandering but that seems a bit redundant doesn’t it? Pandas are Asian bears right? Or what about Blatinopandering? No no no, that’s just too many things for Republicans to think about in a collective manner. But enough about Asian bears. In all seriousness, I’m sort of the school of thought that politicians evolve on issues. Take Mittens Romney as the penultimate example of this. Back when he was running for governor of Massachusetts, Romney was adamantly pro-everybody and everything. He liked the gays and he was for a woman’s right to privacy. Then he ran for president and he “evolved” on those issues. Wait, I mean devolved. Sorry, but he went from being for people to against them. That’s called devolution folks. Cue the Republicans. They’ve now accused Mrs. Clinton of changing her position on whether or not to deport the children crossing the Mexican/US border. In the above video interview, Clinton was asked about her position and she was damn clear: children who aren’t refugees should be given shelter while they’re here, a safe place to live and then adjudicated back to their countries. Children who are refugees and fleeing violence and murder in their home countries should be granted a safe and healthy asylum here in the US. This, by the way, is current US law. I’m not sure what part of that isn’t a) clear and b) consistent with what she’s been saying for years. The good news is this folks: if Mittens Romney runs again in 2016, he’s already assured the American people all these “illegals” will just self-deport. Remember that brilliant policy statement from the 2012 campaign? I sure as hell do. And since we’ve known all along what Mrs. Clinton’s views were, it looks like the immigration debate between Romney and Clinton will be a choice between a bunch of “Mexicans” running back across the border or maybe something a bit more, well, erudite. *Media Matters for America: “Right-Wing Media Distort Hillary Clinton's Comments To Falsely Claim She Endorsed Hamas” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/07/29/right-wing-media-distort-hillary-clintons-comme/200247>* By Thomas Bishop July 29, 2014, 8:11 p.m. EDT Right-wing media selectively edited comments made by Hillary Clinton to falsely accuse her of endorsing Hamas' extremist tactics. But Clinton made clear that Israel has a right to defend itself and credited its measures to decrease civilian casualties. In an interview with Fusion TV's Jorge Ramos, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renewed her support for a cease-fire to end the current Israeli/Hamas conflict. Right-wing media outlets co-opted Clinton's interview to dishonestly claim that Clinton was justifying Hamas' tactics and endorsing the extremist group. On July 29, the Washington Free Beacon distorted Clinton's comments, portraying them as justification of Hamas' tactics in an article headlined "Hillary: Hamas Uses Human Shields Because 'Gaza is Pretty Small.'" On Fox News' The Five, co-host Andrea Tantaros accused Clinton of "trying to make an excuse for Hamas" and defending Hamas "for hiding rockets in places like schools." But the full context of the interview shows that Clinton credited Israel's attempts to prevent civilian casualties by sending warnings before airstrikes and said that "obviously Israel has a right to self-defense." Clinton noted that "any kind of conflict" has civilian casualties, but Gaza's small size and Hamas' tactics make them more acute (emphasis added): CLINTON: I'm not a military planner, but Hamas puts its missiles -- its rockets in civilian areas. Part of it is that Gaza's pretty small and it's very densely populated. They put their command and control of Hamas military leaders in those civilian areas. Israel, I know, has sent warnings and tried to get people to move, but in any kind of conflict there are going to be civilian casualties, and we need to try to get to a cease-fire as soon as possible. *Fusion: “Hillary Clinton thinks the Cuban embargo has been a failure” <http://fusion.net/Leadership/video/hillary-clinton-thinks-cuban-embargo-failure-905215>* By America With Jorge Ramos July 29, 2014, 6:29 p.m. EDT Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Fusion's Jorge Ramos that the she thinks the Cuban embargo has been a failure. In an interview last friday, the possible presidential candidate was blunt in her assessment. "I think it has propped up the Castro's because they can blame everything on the embargo...everything is blamed on the embargo," she said. When Ramos asked Clinton if she would consider visiting the island for a "Nixon goes to China" moment, she responded in the affirmative. "You know, some day I'd like to go to Cuba. I would someday, yes," she said. *Tampa Bay Times (F.L.) blog: The Buzz: “Hillary Clinton: End the Cuban embargo” <http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/hillary-clinton-end-the-cuban-embargo/2190577>* By Alex Leary July 29, 2014, 5:57 p.m. EDT Hillary Clinton, in an interview with Fusion airing tonight, repeats her call to end the Cuban embargo. "I think it has propped up the Castro's because they can blame everything on the embargo," she told host Jorge Ramos. "You don't have freedom of speech, you don't have freedom of expression, you know, you're still having political prisoners, everything is blamed on the embargo. "I would like to see us move toward normalizing relations eventually and therefore more Americans back and forth. That's something president Obama did and I supported the first term. We do have our own political prisoner in Cuba, Alan Gross, a man who's been, you know, thrown into prison and not being given a chance to come home to his family so I'd like to see that resolved. And I would like to see us move toward ending the embargo and trying to, by our example, by commerce, by all kinds of visits, you know, help the Cuban people have a different future" Ramos: "Are you interested in a Nixon moment going to Cuba?" Clinton: "You know, some day I'd like to go to Cuba. I would someday, yes" *Politico: “Hillary Clinton: Redskins name ‘insensitive’” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/hillary-clinton-washington-redskins-name-change-109529.html>* By Jonathan Topaz July 30, 2014, 6:12 a.m. EDT Hillary Clinton says the Washington Redskins need a name change. “I think it’s insensitive and I think that there’s no reason for it to continue as the name of a team in our nation’s capital,” Clinton said during an interview on Tuesday with Jorge Ramos, who asked her if she thought the name was a “racial slur.” “I would love to see the owners think hard about what they could substitute,” she added. Last month, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday canceled six federal trademarks of the team name because it was found to be “disparaging” to Native Americans. The decision has put more pressure on team owner Daniel Snyder — who has vowed he won’t change the name — to move on the issue. Clinton is the latest political figure to suggest the D.C.-area team change its name. In May, 50 senators — 48 Democrats and two independents — wrote NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to urge the league to change the name. “The N.F.L. can no longer ignore this and perpetuate the use of this name as anything but what it is: a racial slur,” the letter read. The letter was not circulated among Republicans. The NFL shot down the letter later that day, saying the team wants to portray a “strong, positive and respectful image” with the name. Last October, President Barack Obama said the nickname offends “a sizable group of people” and that if he were the owner, he would “think about changing it.” And earlier this month, Attorney General Eric Holder said he thought the name should be dropped, calling it “offensive.” When Ramos asked Clinton if she had any suggestions for a new name, the potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate laughed and said she hadn’t thought of any alternatives. *Washington Examiner: “State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches, controversial consulting deal worth $48m; Hillary Clinton's COS copied on all decisions” <http://washingtonexaminer.com/state-department-approved-215-bill-clinton-speeches-controversial-consulting-deal-worth-48m/article/2551428>* [No Writer Mentioned] July 30, 2014, 1:00 a.m. EDT A joint investigation by the Washington Examiner and the nonprofit watchdog group Judicial Watch found that former President Clinton gave 215 speeches and earned $48 million while his wife presided over U.S. foreign policy, raising questions about whether the Clintons fulfilled ethics agreements related to the Clinton Foundation during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. According to documents obtained by Judicial Watch and released Wednesday in an ongoing Freedom of Information Act case, State Department officials charged with reviewing Bill Clinton's proposed speeches did not object to a single one. Some of the speeches were delivered in global hotspots and were paid for by entities with business or policy interests in the U.S. The documents also show that in June 2011, the State Department approved a consulting agreement between Bill Clinton and a controversial Clinton Foundation adviser, Doug Band. The consultancy with Band's Teneo Strategies ended eight months later following an uproar over Teneo's ties to the failed investment firm MF Global. State Department legal advisers, serving as "designated agency ethics officials," approved Bill Clinton's speeches in China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Panama, Turkey, Taiwan, India, the Cayman Islands and other countries. The memos approving Mr. Clinton's speeches were routinely copied to Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's senior counsel and chief of staff. Mills is a longtime Clinton troubleshooter who defended the president during his impeachment. In the Benghazi affair, Mills reportedly berated a high-ranking official at the U.S. embassy in Libya for talking to a Republican congressman. Under State Department protocols, a "designated agency ethics official" is assigned to advise the secretary of state about "potential or actual conflicts of interest." In a December 2008 memorandum of understanding, the protocols were expanded to Bill Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and related initiatives — specifically, to reviewing Bill Clinton's proposed speeches and consulting deals. In an accompanying letter to the State Department legal adviser, Clinton lawyer David Kendall noted that Bill Clinton would disclose proposed consulting deals and, for speeches, provide "the identities of the host(s) (the entity that pay the speaker's fee)" so that the State Department "in consultation with the White House as appropriate, may conduct a review for any real or apparent conflicts of interest with the duties of the Secretary of State." But an inspection by the Examiner and Judicial Watch of donations to the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton's personal financial disclosure forms, and the State Department conflict-of-interest reviews shows that at least $48 million flowed to the Clintons' personal coffers and foundation from many entities that clearly had interests in influencing the Obama administration — and perhaps currying favor with a future president as well. Saudi Arabia, for example, was a key Clinton benefactor. The oil-producing giant has had a relationship with the Clintons dating back to Bill Clinton's time as governor of Arkansas. In 1992, while running for president, then-Gov. Clinton secured a $3.5 million Saudi donation for a Middle East studies program at the University of Arkansas. A few weeks after Clinton was inaugurated president, the Saudis kicked in another $20 million. Both deals were brokered by a close Clinton friend, David Edwards. Overall, the Clinton Foundation has received staggering sums from Saudi benefactors — between $18 million and $50 million. (The foundation's donations are reported in ranges, not specific numbers.) While Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Bill Clinton gave two speeches in Saudi Arabia, earning a total of $600,000. In January 2011, for example, Bill Clinton spoke at a global business forum in Riyadh founded by the Saudi Investment Authority and sponsored by the Dabbagh Group, a commercial colossus with close ties to the Saudi royal family. His fee for the speech: $300,000. During Hillary Clinton's time at the State Department, Bill Clinton also gave four speeches in the United Arab Emirates, earning $1.1 million. For two speeches in Egypt, he earned $425,000. UAE-linked entities also have donated at least $2.7 to $11.5 million to the Clinton Foundation, and Egyptian entities have donated at least $250,000 to $750,000. While the State Department did not object to Bill Clinton's speeches in the Arab world — or anywhere else — it did turn down a proposed consultancy with a longtime Clinton friend and supporter, the Israeli-American media mogul Haim Saban. In turning down the consultancy, a February 2009 State Department memo noted that Saban "is actively involved in foreign affairs issues, particularly with regards to the Middle East, which is a priority area for the secretary." The consultancy with Teneo and Band, the longtime Clinton adviser, was outlined in a June 2011 memo from Band himself, writing "on behalf of President Clinton," to a State Department legal adviser. Bill Clinton would advise Teneo on "geopolitical, economic and social trends." Band requested a response within 10 business days. He got it in seven. "Please be advised that we have no objection," the State Department wrote. Bill Clinton also was active in China, as was Hillary Clinton, who championed the notion of a "pivot" toward Asia during her time as secretary of state. In the period after Hillary Clinton signed the ethics agreement, Bill Clinton gave four speeches in China or to Chinese-sponsored entities in the U.S., earning $1.7 million. By comparison, between 2001 through 2007 — just after he left office, when a former president is normally most in demand — he gave seven speeches in China, earning $1.4 million. Groups with interests in China also donated between $750,000 and $1.75 million, at a minimum, to the Clinton Foundation. Taiwan took an interest in Bill Clinton as well. In November 2010, he spoke on global warming and social inequality at a Taipei event sponsored by Singapore-based UNI Strategic. His fee? $400,000. The Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office donated close to $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the Taiwan Mobile Foundation and a semiconductor manufacturer also contributed. Turkish sponsors paid Bill Clinton $1 million for three speeches, including one to an Arab stock exchange. In Russia, Bill Clinton gave two speeches for $625,000. One was to the Russian investment bank, Renaissance Capital, at a 2010 event titled "Russian and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Going Global." The State Department background memo described the bank as "focused on the emerging markets of Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Sub-Saharan Africa." The Russian Standard Bank also donated to the foundation. In India, Bill Clinton collected $300,000 for two speeches. He also gave speeches to Indian companies and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce in Toronto, New Jersey and Disney World. At one, a "conference on business process outsourcing/off-shoring," hosted by an outsourcing firm, the discussion centered around "the benefits and disadvantages of outsourcing IT," according to a State Department document. In Panama, Bill Clinton earned $325,000 for one speech. And in the Cayman Islands — a notorious offshore money haven — $225,000 for a speech, noted a State Department document, "at a ticketed event that will target the business community in Grand Cayman." *Mother Jones: “Quote of the Day: ‘The Press Loves to Cover Her Hard’” <http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/07/quote-day-press-loves-cover-her-hard>* By Kevin Drum July 29, 2014, 2:49 p.m. EDT Dave Weigel notes that the media is still obsessed with Hillary Clinton's comment about being "dead broke" when she and Bill left the White House: “They've got to be sick of this by now. Maggie Haberman had it nailed three weeks ago: Hillary Clinton was ‘still raw over the partisan wars that hindered her husband’s legacy and left the couple with millions of dollars in legal debt.’ Her answer, as she told Ramos, was accurate, and it's baffling to her that this became a ‘gaffe.’ As she continued her tour, HarperCollins was printing up copies of Clinton, Inc., a tell-all by the Weekly Standard's Daniel Halper. On Page 18, Halper recalls that in 2001 ‘the Clintons were broke, owing a fortune in legal fees from the many investigations into their personal lives,’ and that they had to be loaned $1.3 by Terry McAuliffe. Until just a month ago, that was how even conservatives remembered the Clintons' departure from the White House.” “She has a lot of positive attributes that are currently just being overwhelmed by all this negative coverage. And it’s going to keep going. The momentum—there’s, there’s— The press loves to cover her hard.” This comes courtesy of Bob Somerby, who's been following this ever since the initial flood-the-zone coverage of Hillary's ‘gaffe’ in the Washington Post. Somerby tells the rest of the story: “Multimillionaire TV stars asked if voters would support a person as wealthy as Clinton. In response to Clinton’s answers, some of the nation’s most famous pundits launched their famous ‘gaffe culture.’ “The Washington Post even launched a front-page jihad concerning the size of Clinton’s speaking fees. In the New York Times, Maureen Dowd assailed Clinton for her ‘rapacious’ behavior and her ‘wanton acquisitiveness,’ which she was said to be passing along to her daughter. “....Halperin made a starting suggestion—he suggested the press corps’ coverage of a major candidate could determine the outcome of our next White House campaign. “Plainly, that’s what happened in Campaign 2000, when a twenty-month war against Candidate Gore let George Bush reach the White House. In the main, that war was conducted by the mainstream press corps, not by the RNC. “The press corps’ poisonous war against Gore let Bush reach the White House. But it’s a basic law of the guild: Major journalists never suggest that the behavior of their own guild could have such startling effects.” The media's preoccupation with the Clintons' wealth won't last forever. Even for the Washington press corps, it's too transparently silly to pretend that it's somehow surprising that a presidential candidate is wealthy. But Somerby and Halperin are right: it's a sign of things to come. The press has never liked Hillary, and she's never liked them, and that's that. If she decides to run for president, this is going to be one of her biggest problems—or maybe her biggest, period. She's just never going to catch a break. *Facebook post: Sen. Ted Cruz <https://www.facebook.com/tedcruzpage/posts/10152603151697464>* By Sen. Ted Cruz July 29, 2014, 2:22 p.m. EDT Hillary Clinton seems to fundamentally misunderstand the problem. Hamas doesn't put rockets in schools, mosques, hospitals, and homes because "Gaza is pretty small." Hamas does so--and tells civilians to stay there, when the rockets are about to be taken out--because they want to use the citizens of Gaza as human shields. The entire objective, for Hamas, is to have heart-wrenching pictures of dead Palestinian women and children emblazoned across the evening news, for the UN and the media to use to demonize Israel. Using civilians as human shields is a war crime, and Secretary Clinton should not be excusing it merely as a consequence of the small size of Gaza. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · August 9 – Water Mill, NY: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the Clinton Foundation at the home of George and Joan Hornig (WSJ <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/06/17/for-50000-best-dinner-seats-with-the-clintons-in-the-hamptons/> ) · August 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes Nexenta’s OpenSDx Summit (BusinessWire <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140702005709/en/Secretary-State-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton-Deliver-Keynote#.U7QoafldV8E> ) · September 4 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton speaks at the National Clean Energy Summit (Solar Novis Today <http://www.solarnovus.com/hillary-rodham-clinto-to-deliver-keynote-at-national-clean-energy-summit-7-0_N7646.html> ) · October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network <http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>) · October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation Annual Dinner (UNLV <http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>) · ~ October 13-16 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes salesforce.com Dreamforce conference (salesforce.com <http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/keynotes.jsp>) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)