EFTA00233059.pdf

From: Sent: Monda . S tember 17, 2007 9:43 AM To: Cc: Subject: eanng e ore Judge Marra has been taken off the calendar the Roy and Jay — I received a call from Jenny, who is standing in as Judge Marra's CRD. She spoke with judge and he agreed to take the matter off the calendar. I told Jenny that if we are able to reach a plea agreement, we will withdraw the subpoena and Mr. Black will withdraw his motion to quash. Please call if you have questions. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Tracking: 18 EFTA00233059 From: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:56 AM To: 'Jay Lefkowitz' Subject: RE: Follow up Sorry, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. • Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailt Sent: Frida Siiirmber AM To: ■ Subject: Follow up Confidential - thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. I will call you late this pm (if you leave me a number to reach you), and then we can plan on getting this done Monday. *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 20 EFTA00233060 From: Sent: •naay, septemoer 14. ZU .04 AM To: 'Jay Lefkowitz' Subject: Plea documents Hi Jay — I'm not sure which of those e-mail addresses is correct. Here are drafts of the plea agreement and information. They have not yet been blessed by Miami, but they have approved of prior similar drafts, so these should be close to what is needed. My home e-mail is ; You also can get me over the weekend on my cell phone at Information arging 1512 and OLY Plea ement v4 1512 a Reezirds, A. .aVillafaiia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Beach FL 33401 Palm 22 EFTA00233061 From: Sent: lairs ay, ep em er , . 7 PM To: 'Jay Lefkowitz' Subject: RE: Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being activity on an airplane, I just want to make sure that there is factual basis for the plea that the agents can confirm. I'm not sure exactly where I will be tomorrow morning, so is it alright if I call you? Have a good evening. A. I=Villafaiia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:21 PM To: ' Subject: - Are you free to speak at 9 am tomorrow? Thanks. Jay *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmastenPkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. *********************************************************** 37 EFTA00233062 From: Sent: Wednesday Sentemher 12, 2007 4:20 PM To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Jay — It was nice seeing you again. and I talked witandillf. We are all satisfied in principle with the agreement, but the Office is uncomfortable with the recommended federal charge. Specifically, we are concerned about the effect of taking the position that Mr. Epstein's house is in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and we have no evidence of any assaults occurring either on Mr. Epstein's plane or offshore from his residence. We are hoping that you can find an alternative federal statute that can be used. I also will wait to hear from to discuss logistics. Thank you. A.= Villafaiia Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 46 EFTA00233063 From: Sent: 3:44 PM To: Cc: Subject: Jay — It was nice seeing you again. and I talked with and M. We are all satisfied in principle with are the agreement, but the Office is uncomfortable with the recommended federal charge. Specifically, we and concerned about the effect of taking the position that Mr. Epstein's house is in the special maritime territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and we have no evidence of any assaults occurring either on Mr. Epstein's plane or offshore from his residence. from We are hoping that you can find an alternative federal statute that can be used. I also will wait to hear to discuss logistics. Thank you. A. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Tracking: 47 EFTA00233064  9 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:15 PM To: rt Cc: (USAFLaa (USAFLS Subject: evised greement re Epstein Dear Gerry: I have attached a revised version, as per Mr..= request. The operative terms have not changed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Also, please confirm your receipt of this e- mail. Thank you. 070911 Epstein don-Prosecution.. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beac 33401 Tracking: 54 EFTA00233065 From: Sent: Londay, September 10, 200/ PM To: Gerald Lefcourt Cc: (USAFLS); Subject: Gerry: As per your discussion with U.S. Attorney I= I have attached the Office's written counterproposal. If you have any questions regarding its terms, please do not hesitate to call. 070910 Epstein don-Prosecution.. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Tracking: 72 EFTA00233066  Page 1 of 2 Gmail - (no subject) GM I e r Ann t; (no subject) 2 messages Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:26 PM To: JayilliganaMS - I will call you as soon as the show ends. Jay The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Ann Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 3:54 PM To: Jay Lefkowitz and he Hi Jay — This can wait until after the show, but my voice is going so I thought I would type it up. I talked to address the crimes that we were addressing, and still doesn't like the factual basis. In his opinion, the plea should only we were not investigating Mr. Epstein abusing his girlfriend. So, these are the only options that he recommended: the state, 1. We go back to the original agreement where Mr. Epstein pleads only to state charges and serves his time in except that we can agree to only 18 months imprisonment. one count of 2. Mr. Epstein pleads guilty to the state charges and also pleads to either two obstruction counts or to so that Mr. Epstein can serve his violating 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B), with a joint non-binding recommendation of 18 months, time federally. to a 371 count 3. (My suggestion only, not MS: I go back to the U.S. Attorney and ask him to agree to an ABA-plea serve all of his time In a (conspiracy to violate 2422(b)) with a binding 20-month recommendation so that Mr. Epstein can federal facility. Or 4. Mr. Epstein pleads to one obstruction count, and serves part of his time federally and part state. On your other proposed changes, some are fine and some are problematic. after Re your paragraph 2: As to timing, it is my understanding that Mr. Epstein needs to be sentenced in the state needs to plead guilty and be sentenced after serving his federal time. sentenced in the federal case, but not that he the timing issues be addressed only in the state agreement, so that it isn't obvious to the recommended that some of that Mr. Epstein should judge that we are trying to create federal jurisdiction for prison purposes. My understanding is to the state offenses, be sentenced on the sign a state plea agreement, plead guilty to the federal offenses, plead guilty 9/16/2007 http://mail.google.com/mail/Tik=1790ddd17 l&view=pt&th=1150fe32b4d1520a&search=inbox&qt=... EFTA00233067  Page 2 of 2 Gmail - (no subject) federal sentence. federal offenses, and then be sentenced on the state offenses, and then start serving the or to appeal his state plea or Re your paragraph 3: As to the reservation of Mr. Epstein's right to withdraw his state plea could proceed on our charges. sentence, that is fine, but we need the caveat that, if he were to do so, the United States given the way we have Re your paragraph 6: With respect to the waiver of the right to appeal the federal sentence, getting to the 18 month sentence will require an upward departure. The version drafted the information, it is possible that were working from is a federal non-prosec ution agreement, the ones I have sent you recently of the agreement that you language in those versions is alright. are plea agreements that get filed with the court. Please see if the appeal waiver I know that this will delay Mr. Re your paragraph 7: As I mentioned, we will not waive the presentence investigation. Epstein's sentencing by 70 days, but that will allow him to get all of his affairs in order. As to bail, it will be set at the time limitations. I have no objection of arraignment, and we can work out a joint recommendation regarding the amount and its his sentencing, but I'm not sure that it to making a joint recommendation that Mr. Epstein remain out on bond pending that issue. However, I can assure you, and we can belongs in a plea agreement, especially since I can't bind the court on will join in your recommend ation that he remain out on bond pending put it on the record during the plea collooquy, that I prison camp issue. As I mentioned, I have opposed a designation only once in a very sentencing. The same goes for the will not oppose your particular case. I can assure you, and we can put it on the record at the plea colloquy that I recommendation for Mr. Epstein's designation. Trust Agreement, and I don't think Re your paragraph 8: As I mentioned over the telephone, I cannot bind the girls to the it is appropriate that a state court would administer a trust that seeks to pay for federal civil claims. We both want to avoid keep these matters unscrupulous attorneys and/or litigants from coming forward, and I know that your client wants to Here is my recommend ation. During the outside of public court filings, but I just don't have the power to do what you ask. The three motion for appointmen t of the Guardian Ad Lltem. period between Mr. Epstein's plea and sentencing, I make a as much as I can getting the girls' approval of this procedure of us sit down and discuss things, and I will facilitate language, let me suggest because, as I mentioned, I think it is probably in their best interests. In terms of plea agreement the following: represent the identified The United States agrees to make a motion seeking the appointment of a Guardian ad Litem to the parties agree to work together in good faith to develop a Trust victims. Following the appointment of such Guardian, approval, that would provide for any damages owed to the identified victims pursuant to Agreement, subject to the Court's 18 U.S.C. Section 2255. Then include the last two sentences of your paragraph 8. resolving all criminal Re the two paragraphs following your paragraph 8: I will include our standard language regarding would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all of liability and I will mention "co-conspirators," but I could charge. Also, we do not have the power to bind Immigration and we make it a policy not the other persons that we tel as I know, there is no plan to try to proceed on any immigration charges to try to, howe against either or plea agreement, but I Also, on the grand jury subpoenas, I can prepare letters withdrawing them as of the signing of the grand jury's investigation has would prefer to take out that language. In my eyes, once we have a plea agreement, the ended and there can be no more use of the grand jury's subpoena power. suggest that tomorrow we either I had hoped that we were far closer to resolving this than it appears that we are. Can I meet live or via teleconference, either with your client or having him within a quick phone call, to hash out these items? I grand jury, if necessary, but was hoping to work only a half day tomorrow to save my voice for Tuesday's hearing and . I will make sure that I have maybe we can set a time to meet. If you want to meet "off campus" somewhere, that is fine all the necessary decision makers present or "on call," as well. issues for tomorrow. If we can resolve some of these issues today, let's try to, and then save only the difficult Sorry for the long e-mail, and for mining your date with your daughter. 9/16/2007 http://mail.google.com/mailnik=1790ddd171&view-tptecth=1150fe32b4d1520a8csearch=inbox&gt=... EFTA00233068 From: Jay Letkowitz Sent: Tuesday Sentemher 1R 7007 9.18 AM To: Subject: RE: Draft Agreements. time. i hear you, and understand your position. But it's really only a 90 day difference, if he gets gain That said, let me know if you think your suggestion can work. I will study it too. Slit" To "Jay Letkowitz" cc Subject RE: Draft Agreements? 09/18/2007 09:14 AM strongly Jay - I know that the U.S. Attorney will not go below 18 months of prison/jail time (and I would oppose the suggestion). Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised in the release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation state on the state charges with the first 6 months being community control. ME c. 1(USAFLSI)•' To "Jay Lefkowitr 09/18/2007 08:44 MA cc Subject Draft Agreements? EFTA00233069 Hi Jay — I was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but I will try to remain patient. I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (1) a plea agreement to a federal charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him). A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy. A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute without compulsory process. On the obstruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we could consider that. Hope that helps. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 2 EFTA00233070 From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Tuesday Seotember 18 2007 8.59 AM To: Subject: Re: Draft Agreements? an alternative to what we discussed just now might be to plead to one count of 1512, serve 12 months plus supervised release which would be one year of home detention (if we can make that work), followed by two years of probation in the state on the state charges with the first 6 months being community control. agar To ;My leftcovrite <JLetkoeflzakirkland.com, cc Subject Draft Agreements? 09118/2007 08:44 AM Hi Jay — I was hoping there would be things for me to read this morning, but I will try to remain patient. I believe there are only two types of agreements that would apply to this case: (1) a plea agreement to a federal charge or charges; and (2) a non-prosecution agreement (which is really a deferred prosecution agreement because the defendant agrees that if he violates the agreement, the U.S. can prosecute him). A plea agreement is part of the court file. It is not accessible on-line via PACER, but someone can go to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy. A non-prosecution agreement would not be made public or filed with the Court, but it would remain part of our case file. It probably would be subject to a FOIA request, but it is not something that we would distribute without compulsory process. On the obstruction charges, many of the facts I included in that first proffer were hypothesized based upon our discussions and the agents' observations of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. n second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we could consider that. Hope that helps. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 3 EFTA00233071 From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Monda September 17 2007 3:11 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: y w erea outs - do you have another obstuction proffer 1 can review that you have drafted? Also, if we go that route, would you intend to make the deferred proscution agreement public? Thanks - Jay Ori Mrsmoe From: " Sent: 09/17/2007 01:08 PM AST To: Ja Lefkowitz Cc: " XUSAFI.S1)" Subject: My whereabouts Hi Jay — I am headed home. If a document is ready to be reviewed later today, can you send a copy to me and also to Rolando (who is steppin in for ). Please send to m home e-mail address — and give me a call on my cell , so I can be ready for some discussions tomorrow. If anything else comes up, please don't hesitate to call. Thanks, *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterOkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. *********************************************************** 5 EFTA00233072 From: Jay Lefkowitz [ Sent: Monda Se temper 1 t ZUW SA/ AM To: • BLACK Ro Cc: e cou era arty .; • Subject: e: Hearing before Judge Marra has been taken off the calendar Thanks I gather you and Roy are also addressing the subpoenas as well. I will speak with you later in the day. Jay Original Message Front: "I )" Sent: 09/17/2007 09:42 AM AST To: < Ja Lefkowitz Cc: "Gerald Le )" >:" ndrew.Louraetwusdot.gov> Subject: I fearing before Judge Marra has been to en of t to ca en ar Roy and Jay —I received a call from Jenny, who is standing in as Judge Marra's CRD. She spoke with the judge and he agreed to take the matter off the calendar. I told Jenny that if we arc able to reach a plea agreement, we will withdraw the subpoena and Mr. Black will withdraw his motion to quash. Please call if you have questions. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. 7 EFTA00233073 From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Friday, September 14, MU/ 1114 PM To: Subject: Le: Fdlow up Thx. I am available late this pm, or over the weekend to speak. Original Message From: "1 )" Sent: 09/14/2007 09:55 AM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Follow up Sorry, Jay. I just got this and have to run off to the hospital. I will revise and re-email you tomorrow or late tonight. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 9:40 AM To: Subject: Follow up Confidential - thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. I will call you late this pm (if you leave me a number to reach you), and then we can plan on getting this done Monday. 9 EFTA00233074 From: Jay Lefkowitz( Sent: Friday, Septem er 14, ZUU/ UM/ AM To: Subject: OHM up Confidential t=- thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. I will call you late this pm (if you leave me a number to reach you), and then we can plan on getting this done Monday. ***************************************::****************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmasterMkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. * ********************************************************** 13 EFTA00233075 From: Jay Lefkowitz[[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:35 PM To: Subject: e: Sounds good. I will be at home. Let's talk at 9 am. Already thinking about the same statutes. Look forward to speaking in the morning. Best, Jay Original Message From: Sent: 09/13/2007 07:26 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Hi Jay -- Yes, I am. I have been spending some quality time with Title 18 looking for misdemeanors. Do you want to take a look at 18 USC 403, 18 USC 1512(d), and 47 USC 223(a)(1)(B) and we can talk about them tomorrow? I know that someone mentioned there being activity on an airplane, I just want to make sure that there is factual basis for the plea that the agents can confirm. I'm not sure exactly where I will be tomorrow morning, so is it alright if I call you? Have a good evening. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:21 PM To: Subject: - Are you free to speak at 9 am tomorrow? Thanks. Jay *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for 15 EFTA00233076 From: Jay Lefkowitz (I Sent: Wedoesda . Se tenser Am! o.ou To: Cc: Subject: e. e reyEpstein a meant to copy you on my first attempt to respond to =I We appreciate the courtesy of today's meeting and your agreement and We understand the concerns you arc raising and will work over the next few days to come up with a mutually acceptable solution. will speak with you no later than Monday, and in the interim, if we come up with a solution, we will be in touch with you. Best, Jay Original Message From: "' Sent: 09/12/2007 03:43 PM AST To: Jay Lelkowitz Cc: 1 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Jay — It was nice seeing you again. and I talked with and We are all satisfied in principle with the agreement, but the Office is uncomfortable with the recommendeilleral charge. Specifically, we are concerned about the effect of taking the position that Mr. Epstein's house is in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and we have no evidence of any assaults occurring either on Mr. Epstein's plane or offshore from his residence. We are hoping that you can find an alternative federal statute that can be used. I also will wait to hear from to discuss logistics. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 19 EFTA00233077  ) From: Gerald Lefcourt [GBL©lefcourtlaw.com] Sent: Thursday. Seotember 06.7007 11:14 AM To: ) Subject: RE: Beller, any ESappearances Attachments: 2007-08-23 GBL to Villafana re Gany, Beller.pdf — With all that is going on, you may have forgotten my letter of August 23, 2007, which I reattach. We do not represent Beller or Gany. Nat Dershowitz represents Mr. Beller. As to NES, we understood you added categories of documents you were requesting and also asked us to revisit the NES response to the original subpoena, and you wanted a certification. We are working on getting that done, though we may find we need a few extra days. Also, I have spoken to Nat since the August 23 letter was sent and he tells me that he understood from you that what was being requested from Mr. Beller was NES documents, not a personal appearance. I thought I would pass that along. Gerald B. Lefcourt Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. Tel. Fax From: [mailto b Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 9:28 AM To: Gerald Lefcourt Subject: Beller, Gany and NES appearances September Hi Gerry — I am writing to confirm that the NES witnesses will appear as scheduled on Tuesday, 11th. Can you please confirm? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 34 EFTA00233078 EFTA00233079 Legal counsel law firm dcrshowitz profile available from Martindale.com Page 1 of 1 fr. LexisNexise Maninciale.flubbefr -........e . 4O4 (.. Sft martindale.com • lir sal town Lawyer Locator > Starch Results > Profile Lawyer Locator New Search Search Results Basic Search Advanced Search fa Print C21Email el Search Web Browse Law Firms Browse Lawyers Private Practice Lawyer Profile for Nathan Z. Dershowitz Top 10 Usts Nathan Z. Dershowitz Legal Articles Member Peer Review Ratings Dershowitz Ei er & Adelson, P.C. Dispute Resolution NM= ew York Co. Legal Personnel Legal Careers Telephone: Fax: Professional Resources Email: e mail Practice Development AY Peer Review Rated News & Events Customer Service Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Complex Litigation; Civil Litigation; Post-Conviction Experts & Services Remedies Admitted: 1966, New York Law School: New York University, LL.B., 1966 More resources... College: Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, B.A., 1963 Attorney directory from tawyers.corn Born: Brooklyn, New York, 1942 Counsel to Counsel Forums eAttomey ISLN: tealsMeals® lexISONE® for Small Firms LeXisfkkls Analyzer Now Search Search Results STop Lawyerlocatmeo.uk I Anwalt24.de I martindale.co.il I martindalolp I firdalowyer.cn I law24.co.za Home I Contact Us I About Us I Site Info I Products I Services I Media Room Copyright I Terms & Conditions I Privacy Policy http://www.martindale.com/xp/Martindale/Lawyer_Locator/Search_Lawyer_Locator/seare... 8/27/2007 EFTA00233080 Dershowitz, Eiger & Adelson, P.C. Attorneys and Legal Personnel on Martindale.com Pagc 1 of I are ilk LexisNexis' 1 Martindale•Ilubbell* --SO • martindale.com a. Log on Lawyer Locator > Profile Lawyer Locator Basic Search ra Pant a Email S Search Web Advanced Search Browse Law Firms Attorneys/Legal Personnel from Dershowitz, Eiger & Adelson, P.0 Browse Lawyers New York, New York Top 10 lists Dershowitz, Eiger & Adelson, P.C. Legal Articles Telephone: Peer Review Ratings Fax: (New York Co.) Emal : Dispute Resolution Legal Personnel OverviewpAPeoplea mpractices 1942; admitted to bar, 196 Legal Careers Nathan 2._Dershow.itz, (Member) born Brooklyn, New York, York. Education: Brooklyn College of the City University of New York (B.A., 1963); New Professional Resources University (LL.B., 1966). Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Complex Litigation; Civil Lit4 Post-Conviction Remedies. Erna. Nothan Z. Dershowitz AV P_eer Review Rated Practice Development News & Events Victoria B. Eiger, (Member) born Suffern, New York, 1951; admitted to bar, 1977, New. Customer Service 1981, New York. Education: Brown University (A.B., 1973); Rutgers University (J.D., 19; Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Civil Litigation; Complex Litigation; Post-Conviction Eh Experts & Services Email: Victoria Et. Eiger E Amy Adelson, (Member) born Brooklyn, N.Y., 1953; admitted to bar, 1977, New York. New York University (B.A., 1973; J.D., 1976). Phi Beta Kappa; Order of the Colt Practice Criminal Appeals; Civil Litigation; Complex Litigation; Post-Conviction Remedies. Erne: A More resources... Adeisszn Attorney directory from Lawyeis.com Counsel to Counsel Forums eAttorney LexisNexis® Daniela Klare Elliott, (Associate) born Washington, D.C., 1966; admitted to bar, 1994, lexisONE® for Small Firms Education: Williams College (B.A., 1987); Rutgers University (J.D., 1993). Languages: Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Complex Litigation; Civil Litigation; Post-Conviction Rt Email:J:2n Elliott &Top Lavwerlocatorco.ult I Anwalt24.de I manindale.co.li I martindaltip I lirxialavwer.cn I law24.coza Home I Contact Us I About Us I Site info I Products I Services I Media Room Copyright I Terms & Condoms I Privacy Policy littp://www.martindale.com/law_finn./464866-lawyers?PRV=LL2 8/27/2007 EFTA00233081  LAW omega or GERALD B. lareoacure, P.C,. A PROPCSSIONAL CORPORATION TELEPHONE GERALD B LEECOURT FACSIMILE SHER'S RENA'. i t t FRIE FAITH August 23, 2007 VIA E-MAIL Assistant United States Attorney Office of the United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Subpoena datedAugust 16, 2007, to Eric Gany Dear I write concerning the grand jury subpoena dated August 16, 2007, directed to Eric Crazy. Unlike on prior occasions, we never discussed whether I was authorized to accept service of a subpoena to Mr. Gany and instead, you simply sent it to me. Please be advised that I had and have no such authority. I also had no authority to accept service of the subpoena of the same date to Ilarry Beller. However, Mr. Beller is represented by Nathan Dershowitz, Esq., and I am authorized by him to convey that there is no need to re-serve the subpoena to Mr. Beller. I have also provided a copy of it to Mr. Dershowitz. Any further correspondence concerning it should be addressed to Mr. Dershowitz. Mr. Dershowitz can be reached at Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. EFTA00233082  28/2ii07 10:33 DERSH0WITZ,EIGER@ADE PAGE 02"62 DERSROWITZ, EIGER & ADELSON, P.C. 220 YleTeiAvENUCI SUITE 300 Pine TORE, New YOnuf 112001 : T.4.•N Z. DIMINO Vim • I:10 Kit E. EMI R