📄 Extracted Text (374 words)
From: Joi ito <
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:23 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Re: Researchers can't evaluate novel ideas
What time zone are you in? Can you talk at 1PM ET?
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:35, jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote:
> can talk when you like
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:19 PM Joi ito <-> wrote:
> https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2015.228S
> Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual
> =istance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
> Selecting among alternative projects is a core management task in all =nnovating organizations. In this paper, we focus
on the evaluation of =rontier scientific research projects. We argue that the "intellec=ual distance" between the
knowledge embodied in research =roposals and an evaluator's own expertise systematically =elates to the evaluations
given. To estimate relationships, we designed =nd executed a grant proposal process at a leading research university =n
which we randomized the assignment of evaluators and proposals to =enerate 2,130 evaluator—proposal pairs. We find
that evaluators =ystematically give lower scores to research proposals that are closer =o their own areas of expertise
and to those that are highly novel. The =atterns are consistent with biases associated with boundedly rational =valuation
of new ideas. The patterns are inconsistent with intellectual =istance simply contributing "noise" or being associated
=ith private interests of evaluators. We discuss implications for =olicy, managerial intervention, and allocation of
resources in the =ngoing accumulation of scientific knowledge.
please note
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, may
> be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and
> is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
> JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or
> any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected],
> and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
> attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
<?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<IDOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">
<dict>
<key>conversation-id</key>
<integer>6427</integer>
EFTA_R1_01914437
EFTA02664522
<key>date-last-yiewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1526484186</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195717</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>821771</string>
</dict>
</plist>
2
EFTA_R1_01914438
EFTA02664523
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
38328f925340eee58edcaad2c1c95b94f5fd3ed98b53995095c7794c533f94e5
Bates Number
EFTA02664522
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0