📄 Extracted Text (655 words)
PHYS
Men's preference for certain body types has
evolutionary roots
19 March 2015
morphology—in this case lumbar curvature—and an
a b evolved standard of attractiveness," said the
study's co-author David Buss, a UT Austin
psychology professor. "This adds to a growing body
of evidence that beauty is not entirely arbitrary, or
'in the eyes of the beholder' as many in mainstream
social science believed, but rather has a coherent
adaptive logic."
This research, led by UT Austin alumnus and
Bilkent University psychologist David Lewis,
consisted of two studies. The first looked at
vertebral wedging, an underlying spinal feature that
can influence the actual curve in women's lower
backs.
a b
Women with (a) less vertebral wedging at the third-to-
last lumbar vertebra (modal L3 depicted), and (b) greater
wedging, resulting in a more acute angle of lumbar
curvature. Credit: The University of Texas at Austin
A psychology study from The University of Texas
at Austin sheds new light on today's standards of
beauty, attributing modern men's preferences for
women with a curvy backside to prehistoric
influences.
The study, published online in Evolution and
Human Behavior, investigated men's mate
preference for women with a "theoretically optimal Buttock protrusion associated with (a) gluteal
development indicating physical fitness. (b) adipose
angle of lumbar curvature," a 45.5 degree curve tissue deposition, and (c) vertebral wedging. Notes: All
from back to buttocks allowing ancestral women to women exhibit identical buttock protrusion. Women (a)
better support, provide tor, and carry out multiple and (c) also exhibit an identical angle between the
pregnancies. thoracic spine and buttocks (i.e., lumbar curvature).
Credit: The University of Texas at Austin
"What's fascinating about this research is that it is
yet another scientific illustration of a close fit About 100 men rated the attractiveness of several
between a sex-differentiated feature of human manipulated images displaying spinal curves
1/3
EFTA01198509
PHYS
ranging across the natural spectrum. Men were This morphology and men's psychological
most attracted to images of women exhibiting the preference toward it have evolved over thousands
hypothesized optimum of 45 degrees of lumbar of years, and they won't disappear over night.
curvature.
"This tight fit between evolutionary pressures and
"This spinal structure would have enabled pregnant modern humans' psychology, including our
women to balance their weight over the hips," standards of attractiveness, highlights the
Lewis said. "These women would have been more usefulness that an evolutionary approach can have
effective at foraging during pregnancy and less for expanding our knowledge not just of the natural
likely to suffer spinal injuries. In turn, men who sciences, but also the social sciences," Lewis said.
preferred these women would have had mates who
were better able to provide for fetus and offspring,
and who would have been able to carry out multiple Provided by University of Texas at Austin
pregnancies without injury."
The second study addressed the question of
whether men prefer this angle because it reflects
larger buttocks, or whether it really can be
attributed to the angle in the spine itself.
Approximately 200 men were presented with
groups of images of women with differing buttock
size and vertebral wedging, but maintaining a
45.5-degree curve. Men consistently preferred
women whose spinal curvature was closer to
optimum regardless of buttock size.
26° 34° - 43° - 52° 61°
Schematic of a complete series of stimuli. Credit: The
University of Texas at Austin
"This enabled us to conclusively show that men
prefer women who exhibit specific angles of spinal
curvature over buttock mass," said the study's co-
author Eric Russell, a visiting researcher from UT
Arlington.
2/3
EFTA01198510
PHYS
APA citation: Men's preference for certain body types has evolutionary roots (2015, March 19) retrieved 24
March 2015 from http.//phys org/news/2015-03-men-body-evolutionary-roots html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part
may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
3/3
EFTA01198511
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
385dcf52cfc35d0b9681cbefc69642fe6aee96b96a207432667b143fe9e268a0
Bates Number
EFTA01198509
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0