📄 Extracted Text (247 words)
From: (tJSANYS) [Contractor)" •
To:
Cc: ' (USANYS)" -
Subject: GM/victim toll records
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 21:20:15 +0000
Attachments: EPS001-9397-9445.pdf; EPS001-9497-9551.pdf; EPS001-9294-9347.pdf;
Copy_of 2021.11.23_revised_Copy_of !Maxwell_Phone_Tracker.xlsx
Hi all,
Big thanks to = for continuing to move this project along. He reviewed the phone records flagged the other day
for whether a cell ( frnd)") or (a friend)") had any direct
contact with Maxwell associated numbers and determined the following:
1. A number of the phone records flagged the other day were duplicates of one another.
2. Neither of the aforementioned victim numbers was in the records for the number attributed to Maxwell.
3. Both numbers were in the records for the number attributed to
4. In three of the records, the victim contact with happened around the same time as a call between and
Maxwell. In one of the records, the calls between Maxwell and came directly before the call between
and the victim. The other two records showed that the calls between Maxwell and took place within the
same hour (or shorter time frame) as the call between and the victim contact. These three documents are
attached, as well as the spreadsheet displaying this information (all saved here).
5. EPS001-9294-9347 (attached) is the record that has the Maxwell/' calls taking place right before the victim
contact for
Please let us know if you have any questions, and again thanks to for getting this done.
Paralegal Specialist
U.S. Attorney's Office I SDNY
Office:
Cell: ■
EFTA00068551
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
39e44fb2e91da5283917f7d1d2f048762dbf32dab1b7086db6e70b71b8e2f522
Bates Number
EFTA00068551
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0