EFTA01915265
EFTA01915266 DataSet-10
EFTA01915268

EFTA01915266.pdf

DataSet-10 2 pages 374 words document
P17 V16 V11 D1 D7
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (374 words)
To: jeffrey EMeevacation maitcom Cc: lawrence delson From: Richard Joslin Sent Thur 7/24/2014 7:34:27 PM Subject: debt financed distribution Just got off phone with Deloitte and Apollo BRH K-1 now shows interest relating to AMH debt as "debt financed distribution" In years 2007 to 2012 the interest was treated as investment interest. 2013 debt financed interest disclosure — $ I0MM. The treatment of debt financed distributions from a partnership is governed by Notice 89-5. Succinctly, the partnership either: I) Treats all interest as "debt financed" and separately states on K- I for the partner to trace proceeds of debt, with dates and amounts of proceeds, or 2) Looks at expenditures of the partnership during the year of the debt distribution and categorize interest in the manner of the partnership expenditures. To the extent there is more debt than expenditures, then the excess is treated under option I. Given that the 2007-2012 K-1's show zero debt financed distribution disclosure, it would appear that option 2 was followed. However, in 2013 it appears option 1 is not followed. Even if the intent was for option 1, the disclosure on the K- I indicates option 2 was made. I told Deloitte and Apollo tax that I was concerned that there was a flip flop in options and that changing options was not expressly permitted. I also noted that the onus is on the partner to now go back and trace the proceeds in 2007 and to have records in place to then trace how the investments were then returned, sold. For example, if the debt was used to invest in a partnership and the partnership makes cash distributions, the distributions need also to be traced ad infinitum. It also then draws into question how prior year BRH reporting was made. It appears that the entity that has the debt (AMH) changed the reporting on its K-1 and the partners of AMH (AP Professional ) and partners of AP Professional (BRIT) just followed suit. SO the key is to get Deloitte to change the AMH K- I. No tax returns have been filed for 2013 for these entities (extension). EFTA_R1_00354317 EFTA01915266 Richard Joslin CFO Elysium Management LLC 445 Park Ave Ste. 1401 New York, NY 10022 EFTA_R1_00354318 EFTA01915267
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
3a61ae2f5211be9eef78e4c4a1b60921c5fcc416f9071c7384382aa50568bd46
Bates Number
EFTA01915266
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!