📄 Extracted Text (166 words)
From: "-(USAFLS)"
To:" .(USAFLS)" (USAFLS)"
Subject: RE: Responses to RFAs
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:11:17 +0000
Importance: Normal
Sorry I had not gotten around to this before now. Do we want to discuss this, perhaps tomorrow afternoon, or
have the two of you already finished it up?
From: (USAFLS)
Sent: Monde June 24, 2013 9:56 PM
To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS)
Subject: Responses to RFAs
Hi and - Here is my stab at a response. There are a number that I cannot answer.
Isn't the only real factual issue whether or not we conferred with the victims PRIOR TO SIGNING the NPA?
The closest that they come to asking that is 13(b) and even that isn't quite right. Should we suggest that they
send a revised RFA asking simply:
"An attorney for the government did not confer with Jane Doe #1 or Jane Doe 42 prior to entering into the NPA."
« File: Response to Requests for Admissions.docx »
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Florida
EFTA00209795
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
3b1399fbbec1e85b55d0e17dce1f212db5f5297661099348f53c7595d2b27267
Bates Number
EFTA00209795
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0