👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (592 words)
3 December 2013
US Derivatives Spotlight
The low forward combined with depressed long-dated implied volatility has
resulted in the most attractive pricing on long-dated call options in many years.
As an example of how marked this difference can be, if we compare prices of
6O-month maturity SPX ATMS calls on 30-Jun-03 and 11-Oct-13. two periods
with the same implied volatilities but very different forwards, the difference in
premium is -4.5% (19.1% vs. 14.6%). However, if we compare the option
prices in terms of the forward (ATMF strikes), then the above mentioned
spread in the premium disappears.
Historical performance of long-dated calls
Option strategies have had bettor risk-adjusted returns vs index performance
In this section. we look at the historical performance of different long-dated
call strategies . We compare the performance of the option positions vs. the
total return on the SPX Index. These backtests focus on SPX 18M and 36M
options. We chose the 18M maturity for our backtests since many investors
prefer exchange-listed options to OTC and 18M is the farthest listed maturity
for which we had consistent data for the SPX. We chose the 36M maturity to
study the results for even longer-dated options whose vega exposure does not
decay as rapidly. Our results are largely similar among the two maturities
studied and include those for
Calls and call spreads either held to maturity or rolled' after some time
has passed in the life of the option
• Call diagonals (buy long-dated calls financed by selling 1M calls)
where the long-dated call is either held to maturity or rolled after some
time has passed in the life of the option
We find that:
• Call spreads tend to have the highest risk-adjusted return, even after
scaling their delta higher to match the initial delta of just the long call
leg
• Selling 1M 2% annualized premia calls to finance the purchase of
long-dated calls has had better risk-adjusted performance compared
with equity or outright calls
• Rolling long-dated calls and call spreads prior to expiry has generally
(but not always) resulted in higher risk-adjusted returns than holding
them to expiry
The table below displays the performance of these strategies in up and down
market periods. The option strategies have tended to suffer less during market
downturns but have underperformed in rising markets. This is expected as call
options have a delta of less than 1- for every $1 change in the SPX, the call
price will change by less than 1 (by their delta value to be exact), all else equal.
Backrests are for the Dec-02 to Sep-13 period. We assume a transactions cost of olo vols for outright
long dated calls and for those calls financed by selling 1M puts. In addition, we assume that the 1M
options are sold at the bid. We assume a transaction cost of 0 20 vols for cal spreads, which is applied to
the closer-to-the-money strike. As an example, if the 18M ATM can has a vega or volatility sensitivity of 4.
then we add 0.3x4=S1 2 to the mid ATM call price as transaction cost.
The backtests below assume that a long investor replaces his long delta-one position with an equivalent
notional of calls (that is 1 outright call or spread contract per 100 'shares' in the index). All excess funds
are invested in short-term Treasury securities.
4 We roll the long-dated calls alter 1/3rd and 2/3rds of the option's time has passed.
Page 6 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0055503
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00201687
EFTA01364943
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
3c916dd314da6725db616d44115e3a751e5854586459d8f318c073415df12aca
Bates Number
EFTA01364943
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0