EFTA00092874
EFTA00092881 DataSet-9
EFTA00092883

EFTA00092881.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 320 words document
P17 V10 V16 D5 V9
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (320 words)
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, r.0 Laura A. Menninger HADDON ISO East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 MORGAN PH 303.831.7364 EX 303.832.2628 FOREMAN www.hmflaw.com [email protected] April 19, 2021 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Redactions to Pleadings Re: Rule 17 Subpoenas Dear Judge Nathan: Counsel for Ms. Maxwell has conferred with Boies Schiller & Flexner (BSF) concerning any proposed redactions to the pleadings addressing the Rule 17(c) subpoena sub judice, specifically Defendant's Response of April 2 and BSF's Reply of April 5, both of which were submitted to the Court via email in order to allow an opportunity to address any necessary redactions. Ms. Maxwell is mindful of the Court's previous directive that any proposed redactions must be specifically justified and tailored yet is obligated by the Protective Order at I 6 to seek to redact two references to an individual's name and description of that witness that were contained in the Response and Reply. Those two references are highlighted on the attached exhibits. Those two references were derived from a document that the government marked "Confidential." The Court previously upheld the government's requested redaction of that individual's name from its Omnibus Response to Ms. Maxwell's Pretrial Motions and its accompanying Exhibit 7 (Dkt. No. 204-7), an email between the government and. inter alia. EFTA00092881 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan April 19, 2021 Page 2 Ms. McCawley of BSF. It is the privacy rights of this third-party witness (who is separately facing criminal charges in France on related matters) that would be implicated by any public release. Because BSF does not know what materials have been exchanged in this criminal action or what has been designated confidential, BSF takes no position on whether the Defendant's proposed redactions are necessary. Respectfully submitted, Laura A. Menninger EFTA00092882
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
416b94259867cdd88671d2e690875b42ac2deb4e1908a8c5a2727a756d118769
Bates Number
EFTA00092881
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!