📄 Extracted Text (287 words)
31 October 2017
Railroads
Canadian Rails
Profit and pricing discussion
All Class I railroads are solidly profitable in North America, with the companies
under our coverage universe (CP, CNI, CSX, NSC. UNP) reporting an average ebit
margin of 36.5% in 2016. This makes sense to use given the consolidated nature
of the Class I industry, price discipline, and capital intensity needed to maintain
an efficient railroad. There is some variability in the performance, however, with
the Canadian rails achieving superior profitability relative to the U.S. rails.
'Figure 24: Class I rail operating ratios (opex as a of revenue) 2010-2019E Hunter Harrison's Precision Railroading
model has helped CP and CN1achieve beau
85% in-class operating ratios.
80%
75%
70%
65%
60%
55%
2010 2011 2012 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
-4-05X -4k-NSC -41b-UNP
— Drturfalre ant, arlipii.101WIS
One driver of profit variation is yield differentials (i.e. revenue per unit or carload).
For example, if we look at CNI, which has the lowest operating ratio (OR), 34%
of its total traffic in 2016 came from its highest yielding end markets, compared
to just 30% for CSX, which had the highest operating ratio of the Class l's in
2016. As you can see below, the companies with a larger percentage of revenue
coming from higher yielding carloads typically see a lower operating ratio. While
this does not entirely account for margin differentials (carloads are not created
equal from an incremental margin standpoint and average length of haul needs
and # of touch points need to be considered, which we discuss later), higher yields
do translate to higher fixed cost leverage.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc Page 15
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0064285
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00210469
EFTA01371096
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
427f5540624e21ae1c904e4c9529fb8b9a89413be06d6d23a8339f5b539da8a3
Bates Number
EFTA01371096
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0