📄 Extracted Text (270 words)
To:
From:
Sent: Mon 6/12/2017 12:57:12 PM
Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein
Hi
The best way to answer that question is to send proposed language.
Dawn
From:
Sent:aga
To: Dawn Hen
Subject: Re: Je
Commissioner Henry...below response to your email is from Jeffrey:
Can we sign a more comprehensive release on both sides .
On Jun 11, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Dawn Henry wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the email. I explained in a previous email to Mr. Epstein that the changes
made to DPNR's draft consent agreement is not only substantive, but also does not fall
within the language of "SEP". I was asked and I agreed to allow for a SEP in lieu of a
penalty. The language DPNR drafted is the correct language. I can tweak the language,
but the language can not read like the Respondent is making a donation to settle this
matter. As before I was told about a specific issue and language was worked out. I
requested that Great Jim, indicate with specificity the issue to see if language can be
worked out. However, the draft document that Mr. Epstein signed, I can not sign.
Finally, there will continue to be delays, with every suggested language change.
EFTA_R1_00944277
EFTA02215890
Dawn Henry
From
Sent:
To: Dawn Henry
Subject: Jeffrey ps ein
Hello Commissioner Henry. Please sec message and attachment from Jeffrey Epstein.
Thank you,
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
Please see the attached. It essentially expands the release.
The $160K grant is also being sent to your office today.
I was hoping to meet with JP to review future plans on June 17, if possible
EFTA_R1_00944278
EFTA02215891
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
43e1453071f5929f0fa43ac9c52b5fe03009aa676f54bdd41e7df2456b2c615f
Bates Number
EFTA02215890
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0