📄 Extracted Text (573 words)
From: "Charles L. Harper Jr." <
To: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Re:
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:16:02 +0000
From: "Charles L. Harper Jr." <
Date: May 29, 2010 8:12:19 AM EDT
To: Jeffrey Epstein lea®gmail.com>
Subject: Re:
hi Jeffrey,
Great to hear from you. I was just up at MIT this week and met with Seth Lloyd (on Wednesday) and Scott
Aaronson (on Thursday) on the "Cryptography in Nature" small research conference project. These
interactions were fantastic. Both think the topic is wonderful and innovative and has promise. In fact I was
somewhat astonished by their enthusiasm and the depth of adventure they see in the topic. The situation is very
good. I now have a list of great names (about 25) including a number of names of young scholars selected for
extraordinary future promise. The problem will be to narrow down the list to the 8 pr 10 we want.
I did contact Max Tegmark about a month ago to propse the essay contest approach we discussed. He and his
colleagues offered support but did not think that FQX should do it. Reasons they gave were that they saw the
topic as too narrow and too technical compared to the essay contests they have been doing. It is possible that
the real reason was prudence to avoid FQX, already quite "controversial" via Templeton support to become
even more so via Epstein-related sponsorship of prizes. If so, I think they their perspective is not unreasonable
in view of their agenda to build relationships with other donors, though ironically what you and I are working
on would develop a nice topically-rich and deep program linkage with another major donor. My general advice
in this matter is that we should build a relationship slowly and build trust. Seth has suggested Max as a key
person to invite to the meeting.
So basically just this week I have been able to get the key information needed to set the invitations. I am now
at Princeton for 4 days but not in an academic capacity. My daughter Becky will graduate in Astrophysics and
I am attending my 30th reuinion and my wife's father, James Billington (the Librarian of Congress) is attending
his 60th.
Within two weeks I can put together an annotated "final" long list of potential invitees for you to select
from. Since we would not do an essay contest via FQX, the organizing cycle can be faster to do the meeting.
I hope you are doing well and look forward to planning a worthwhile event with you.
Again, I am delighted to have gotten such very string affirmation, input and scientific enthusiasm from both Seth and
Scott. You have very brilliantly suggested a profound topical focus area. Super!!
Allbest,
Charles Harper
Sent from my iPhone
EFTA00753487
On May 29, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
I have been swamped. how do we move forward with the fxq
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00753488
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
44bd202f7904717b5534191e9604359a74844e40b1e07a2b956d0e78238f539f
Bates Number
EFTA00753487
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0