📄 Extracted Text (1,365 words)
From: Erik Viirre <
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:29 PM
To: jeffrey E.
Subject: Research Plan
Extramission Research Plan 6_15_2017
Erik =iirre M.D. Ph.D.
What Evidence will be Necessary to Show EM???
Summary
The photon emission phenomena of the eye may range from the low-level spontaneous visible wavelength =hotons that
have already been demonstrated by Viirre and Furness, to rapid =urst, near-invisible photon streams that are only
activated when precise =lignment occurs between the preferred eyes of two naturally "coupled"=people. The
Extramission research program will be a systematic procedure to look for =he most likely coded photon features based
on the theoretic utility of the phenomenon to humans. The process will be controlled experiments to =etect and verify
any systematic coded features discovered. An advanced photonics =aboratory with various photo detectors, stimulus
control paradigms, specially =onfigured laboratory space and administrative controls and procedures are =ecessary for
this program. Of note, the encoding may be purely in the quantum =ntanglement states of those photons and a search
process for such is planned.
The=study program will be feature searches for two different EM paradigms: one for broadcast signals from individuals
and the other for signals between two adult people with interpersonal connections with high data transfer rates. A
systematic =earch process will be used for discovery and then controlled experiment =rocedures within and across
subjects will be used to verify the presence of =iscovered codes. Other feature searches can be considered.
Below are listed the various photon light stream features that should be considered, the two year study =rogram outline
and the program budget for one and two years. The first year =ill be conventional photonics experiments followed by a
project review and the =econd year will be validation studies of the first year and also examine =uantum state entangled
photons as stimuli. Also in the second year will be investigations of mother/child pairs.
Light Stream Features to Examine:
1. Light Timing
=nbsp; -Continuous, uncoded/coded
=nbsp; -Intermittent uncoded/coded, regular/irregular, timed/random
EFTA_R1_01431915
EFTA02398141
-Stimulus Triggered =ncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed
2. =ight Features
- Wavelength(s), single, narrow band, broadband, multiple, polarization?
= Visible/non-visible
&=bsp; Endogenous Photon Generation: Back prop Photoreceptors
= =nbsp; =xternal Catalytics with controls: Autofluoresence.
- wavelengths that are likely to be received: photoreceptor or two photon.
=nbsp; - on/off axis
3. Stimuli and =ontrols
=nbsp; -Dark
=nbsp; &n=sp; Continuous
=nbsp; &n=sp; Recorded Eye
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Shuttered
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Hooded
-Light Stimuli
=nbsp; &n=sp; Ganzfield
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; White
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Monochromatic
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Just Detectable, Moon, Room, Daylight
=nbsp; &n=sp; Spot
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Laser
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Fovea
=nbsp; &n=sp; Images
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Static
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Dynamic
2
EFTA_R1_01431916
EFTA02398142
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Smooth
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Saccadic
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; =nbsp; Voluntary/Directed
=nbsp; &n=sp; Individuals
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; People
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Partners
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Mother Child
=nbsp; &n=sp; Non Visual
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Auditory
=nbsp; &n=sp; &nbs=; Mental Continuous, Trigger: Visualization
-Stimulus Triggers: =nbsp;uncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed
4.) Eye
=nbsp; -Monocular: continuous
=nbsp; &n=sp; same eye/fellow eye
binocular
- Closed Eye
o Through Lid
o Eye forced open
o Experimental CL
5.) Code
=nbsp; -Continuous
=nbsp; -Pulse: Regular/Irregular
-Stimulus Triggered: uncoded/coded, meaningful/random, regular/random, instantaneous/delayed
- entangled
3
EFTA_R1_01431917
EFTA02398143
Laboratory=Requirements
Sensor:
=nbsp; -Low Light: PMT, Avalanche Photodiodes,
-Camera, Visible, IR, UV, =Hz?
=nbsp; &n=sp; Unobstructed path/filters
- Hood for Darkness in recorded eye, light stimulus through shutter, or fellow eye.
- Divided path: stimulate and record same eye
- Possible Binocular Recording
Stimuli
=nbsp; Same/fellow eye mono/binocular
=nbsp; Control
=nbsp; &n=sp; Timing: delay minimize (shutter/piezo/optical resonance element)
&nb=p; Entangled Photon stimuli with verification of receipt of entanglement.
Eye Activity
=nbsp; Blinks
=nbsp; EOMs: gaze patterns: gaze contingent tasks
Brain Activity
=nbsp; Attention/Alpha
=nbsp; VEP
Data Acquisition
=nbsp; Continuous Recording with Epoch Marking
4
EFTA_R1_01431918
EFTA02398144
=nbsp; &n=sp; Audio, trigger with control
=nbsp; &n=sp; Blink EOM record
=nbsp; &n=sp; EEG signals
Analysis
=nbsp; Data Recording and Analytic Algorithms.
=nbsp;
Laboratory =pace Set-up:
Light Control =hamber
=nbsp; Subject
=nbsp; Stimulus
=nbsp; Experiment video recording: on axis, off axis
=nbsp; lighting controls
=nbsp; Air quality for test subjects
Control Room
=nbsp; Intercom
=nbsp; Lights
Procedure
Prediction =riven Systematic Search: Discovery via Controlled Experiments
The challenge to executing this program will be to efficiently search the available feature space with a process that will
be most likely to detect any coded features. Unlimited =ime and universal fine-resolution examination of all possible
parameters is =ot possible. Thus review, by a group of knowledgeable experts, of likely =eatures would be done. Clever
use of broad wavelength detection photonics will =ead to a search pattern that has the best chance to rapidly detect
photons and =hen coded signals within the photon stream. Once any coded features are =abeled, then repeated tests
within and across individuals will be used to verify =he identification.
5
EFTA_R1_01431919
EFTA02398145
"I'm Here" Broadcast vs. Inter-personal Data Transfer
Two likely coding =aradigms are a broadcast signal that has rudimentary signal content, such as "I =80 m Here" vs. a
detailed data transfer stream that occurs during concentrated direct interpersonal interaction between two people.
The broadcast EM =aradigm would incorporate broadcast features: wide angular spread, low signal content, =ut high
reliability, continuous and repeated signals. It would occur in circumstances where other signals might be reduced: low
light and quiet =udio. It would likely use endogenous photon generation especially as ambient =ight may be low or
indirect, but two photon cascades might be used. Higher energy photons would be more likely to serve as signal carriers
and thus should =e part of the spectrum tested for.
Thus to detect the =roadcast paradigm, continuous recording in the visible wavelengths would be =traightforward and
feasible. Highly sensitive photomultiplier tubes and avalanche =hotodiodes would be able to detect small numbers of
photons, and the system would =e configured for continuous presentation of the photon detection in a =ontrol room
display. Ambient conditions would be darkness, low light and visual stimuli such as shadows of people. Monocular
recording would be done =ith a hooded recording eye and an un-occluded receiving eye. Rudimentary codes =ould be
looked for by visual inspection and simple code detection algorithms =hat detect repeated patterns.
The data transfer paradigm, which would be revolutionary science if discovered, will take a dedicated =roject to detect.
The paradigm is two individuals who can gaze directly into each =ther's eyes. In a "co-equal" partnership, transfer would
be =xpected to be two ways, so one way detection would suffice. A key item would be the passage of =hotons from one
transmitting eye and where that eye is aligned. Eye =E2 preference" would most likely determine both the transmitting
eye and receiving eye. =iming of the Extramission would depend on the gaze being "locked in"=to the receiving eye,
blinks, microsaccade intrusions and then signals for stimulus. The =erson with the receiving eye would be the stimulator:
what would they signal? Continuous recording for bursts of photons would be used. Endogenous =hoton generation
would be the most likely photon generator, but broad-spectrum detectors would be used to improve detection rates.
Recording of all =ctivity features of emitter, receiver, photons, eye activities, stimuli would be seeded to ensure
successful detection.
Extramission Study Budget
1 year
2 years
Year One
Year Two
(Thousands)
Personnel
(burdened)
PI: Erik Viirre =49%)
6
EFTA_R1_01431920
EFTA02398146
150
150
Optical Engineer =:
175
175
Data Equipment =ngineer 1:
150
150
Analyst 1:
150
150
Technician
100
100
Administrator
100
100
Consultants (TAF + QM =r 2)
100
200
Code Breaker
50
7
EFTA_R1_01431921
EFTA02398147
100
Equipment
PMT
20
Avalanche =hotodiode
20
Computer Controls
50
Eyetracking
100
Optics
50
Light hoods etc.
25
Entanglement
250
Infrastructure
Lab (10X10)
Control Room =10X5)
Meeting Room =10X20)
8
EFTA_R1_01431922
EFTA02398148
Admin/reception (10 X =0)
Total 1000 sq =t
25
25
Admin Costs (IRB =tc)
5
5
Travel
SO
75
Total
1055
1230
Plus Overhead =15%)
1213.25
1414.5
Total Equipment
265
250
Total recurring + equipment
9
EFTA_R1_01431923
EFTA02398149
1478.25
1664.5
Erik Viirre M.D. Ph.D
UCSD Departments of Neurosciences,
Surgery and =ognitive Sciences
Arthur C Clarke Center for Human =magination Taubman Endowment for Neurotechnology XPRIZE Foundation
Office: Rm =121, UCSD Atkinson Hall
=
10
EFTA_R1_01431924
EFTA02398150
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
45972eefd6dd3e01baf892b685e3ee0254a5358e3b65c91003b6b4df350758d7
Bates Number
EFTA02398141
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
10
Comments 0