EFTA00929900.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (295 words)
From:
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:38:52 +0000
Yeah that I asked him , because he told me we supposed to get answer December but date sign in January so he
explained me that they sent earlier but than the department sent back because they were needed improving paper
showing that we were the case in court and our pix , and the lawyer sent it again and had to filed out this
application again , for my question why he put his signature he said: " it's just an application , not a document
and ppl there even don't care, don't worry our lawyer know what he is doing " and hopefully we should get it
soon he will let me know .
Miss my sneaky dog!
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 24, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <jea®gmail.com> wrote:
its ok, it says it was signted in january.? you should get an answer soon?
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:33 PM, > wrote:
Sony couldn't make better the pic ,others was even worse , not clear seemed , I can try to scan tomorrow or
otherwise when you come back )
Sent from my iPad
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00929900
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
45ccf14b403cc5ad7e97c982cc51b0e7329e68a58a817b091ec8fd5b0df61c48
Bates Number
EFTA00929900
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0