📄 Extracted Text (367 words)
TONJA HADDAD, PA
315 SE 7th Street telephone
Suite 301
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
September 9, 2013
Via Electronic Mail
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Searcy Denney et al.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Re: Epstein v. Edwards et aL
Mr. Scarola:
I have reviewed your "Amended Exhibit List of Counter-plaintiff, Bradley Edwards," and before
I draft our objections to nearly every item thereon, I wanted to bring it to your attention that this
is obviously an exhibit list from another case, which does not appear to have been reviewed
before it was filed in this case. Below is just a glimpse of the glaring errors which we are, in
good faith, bringing to your attention in an effort to avoid delay and comply with the Court's
Order regarding our Pre-Trial Stipulation.
First, the document itself is titled as an "Amended" exhibit list, notwithstanding that we never
received one before. Next, virtually none of the items delineated in your exhibit list has been
provided to us through discovery, or even referenced, in the instant case. In fact, many of the
names referenced thereon are names that have never been raised in this case; including
approximately a dozen entries regarding reports reviewed by two (2) different doctors who are
not listed as witnesses in this matter. See Plaintiff's Nos. 132-141. Third, you make countless
references to "Plaintiff's" medical records, yearbook photos, IME's, and IHOP employment
records; as well as specific references to Plaintiff as "Jane Doe." See Plaintiff's Nos. 27-30; 110-
120. Irrefutably, these people are not plaintiffs in the case at hand, and the listed items were
clearly meant for another case, as they have absolutely no bearing on an abuse of process or
malicious prosecution cause of action.
The above-referenced examples are by no means to be considered as an exhaustive list of the
glaring deficiencies in your exhibit list. However, should you wish to stand by your current
exhibit list, we will need to review and inspect all items thereon which are not in our possession
so that we may properly evaluate same.
Sincerely,
TONJA HADDAD, PA
Tonja Haddad Coleman
for the firm
EFTA01104264
cc: Brad Edwards, Esq.
Fred Haddad, Esq.
EFTA01104265
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
45dda4059dd274c20354842eef76129c97f132ca6719b7de0e1a43daa0289741
Bates Number
EFTA01104264
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0