📄 Extracted Text (706 words)
From: Michael Fowler
To: Lesley Groff <1
Subject: Re: ATorus - Daily Portfolio Report 2/6
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:20:00 +0000
Attachments: Atorus_BacktestNAV_020614.pdf
Lesley,
My apologies. It appears some of the charts did not PDF correctly. I've attached the updated Daily
Portfolio Report.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Fowler < > wrote:
Lesley,
Please see attached the Daily Portfolio Report for 2/6. Have a great weekend!
Daily Commentary:
"A Reminder About Security Selection & Position Sizing"
Having displayed the "vol thy" adjusted returns yesterday, I feel it worth reminding about security selection
and position sizing. Specifically, the large winners, are not driven by out-sized position sizing (at inception) or
a bias to small or mid cap securities becoming large cap securities. I've previously outlined our liquidity and
market capitalization requirements in our Trading Assumptions document. Our position sizing, at inception,
yields equal potential profit irrespective of notional dollars at risk. Stated another way we eliminate the
volatility "basis" risk between any positions, so that the denominators are all indexed to the same potential
impact to NAV. We then add to winners and never to losers. At the end of the day, our assumption (yes, it is an
assumption) is that the distribution of returns, IN VOL DAYS and over a given interval of time, follows a
Pareto-like distribution. By "indexing" our position sizing (e.g. Kelly Criterion like) to vol, we are always "in"
the positions that represent the majority of returns and scale those returns by adding to them, without dollar
cost averaging into losers.
In essence, would you think the results are more stable of someone who made 50% in a year even with a high
Sharpe, wherein the sample size was (i) small in the number of positions and factors; (ii) profit factor driven
by a small subset of the total trades, and (iii) driven by excess position sizing; or someone who made 15% in a
year, wherein the sample size was (i) large; (ii) profit factor driven by top 25% of positions that do not repeat;
and (iii) position sized equally? While the former is possible, the odds are in the negative in terms of future
consistency. Someone will do it, but the ability to ascribe the results to randomness or intelligence will be
difficult.
"A Near Constant Distribution: Exponents of the Delta in One Period Realized Volatility at the Next Moment
Conditional on the Previous Moment"
A foundation of the strategy is how the distribution of the exponents of volatility scaling conditional on itself
(T+1 (absolute realized vol)/(absolute average realized vol)) is nearly constant across any interval of time or
system . This insight, allows for a constraint on the range of outcomes at the next interval. Concurrently, this
alters the return profile (as vol changes) over varying intervals of times (what I call a Vol & Time Basis Risk).
Having a variable that is nearly stationary, even in the range of its outcomes, allows one to manage a complex
dynamic system more prudently.
EFTA00374716
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data."
Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle
(1859-1930. Scottish physician and writer, most noted for his stories about Sherlock Holmes)
Best Regards.
Michael J. Fowler
Intl. Mobile
Work Email -
Trading Desk Email -
The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual entity named above, and may be privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and delete the original message.
Best Regards,
Michael J. Fowler
Intl. Mobile
Work Email -
Trading Desk Email -
The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
entity named above, and may be privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and delete the original message.
EFTA00374717
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
4720a5eba534d225711601255d7a18fdce41d443fd60bf79e1602e37f7f18750
Bates Number
EFTA00374716
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0