EFTA00094938
EFTA00094939 DataSet-9
EFTA00094941

EFTA00094939.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 404 words document
P17 V16 V9 D6
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (404 words)
From: ' (USANYS)" ci To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" cl Subject: RE: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:35:45 +0000 Okay, thanks. I'll circulate more broadly. From: (USANYS)< > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:32 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: Re: Senate letter I think that's right. There's not much to say - and your proposed response essentially parrots what is in the public record (with the addition of we will handle evidence accordingly, which seems harmless). Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < > wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: As the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York stated yesterday, the investigation into the conduct charged in the Indictment previously filed against Epstein — which included a conspiracy count — remains ongoing, and any evidence or potential testimony relating to that investigation will be handled by the Department accordingly. From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: ( USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to us, we have been looping in OLA which typically wants to be involved and has pretty strong guidance on what, if anything, we should say. I don't know if that's appropriate here given that the request was made directly to OAG, but just wanted to flag. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) wrote: EFTA00094939 See below and attached letter. Can we draft a response for AG to Q 4? Geoff Begin forwarded message: From: > Date: , . . To: "Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS)" Subject: Senate letter Geoff: Please see question 4 in the attached letter. I'm not sure exactly what he's asking but can you please provide a preliminary response to Question 4. Thanks. <08-10-20 I 9---sasse-letter-to-ag-barr-re-epstein-suicide.pdf> EFTA00094940
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
47e82130e4d63bd1bc2ff4575458fb5ccd6d5efa2044556327be229dc4485c47
Bates Number
EFTA00094939
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!