EFTA01019609
EFTA01019611 DataSet-9
EFTA01019613

EFTA01019611.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 525 words document
P17 V16 P22 D6 P20
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (525 words)
From: Lawrence Krauss <I To: Justin Dillon <1 Cc: nancy dahl Subject: Re: Krauss settlement agreement - revised draft Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 13:15:40 +0000 Thanks. Will look at this again. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Ex loration and Physics Department Arizona State University, . Box 871404 Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: 480.965.6378, Assistant (Jessica): 480.965.9825 krauss.facultv.asu.edu Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2018, at 5:40 AM, Justin Dillon < > wrote: I think maybe we just disagree about what you should do here. I think you go too into the weeds; all of the lettered rehashing reads to me as the desperate, dying last gasp, rather than a serious indictment of their process. I think it dramatically undermines the effectiveness of the letter. But that's your call, of course; this is your resignation letter. The highlighting and bolding was my indication of the parts I found most dangerous and that I thought ran the most risk of having you violate the agreement. The highlighting was "dangerous," and the bolding was "very dangerous." Again, it's entirely your call how you want to go out—if you want to rehash what I think are minor points (we left them out of the appeal for a reason) or reargue points we did argue in the appeal, then you can do that. Same goes for risking disparagement by keeping in the harshest language. But I think the letter will be more effective if it's a tighter discussion of the overall process, and not a relitigation of all the bad things they did, and I would hate to see all of this hard work on settlement go out the window if Crow says you disparaged ASU. Justin Dillon KaiserDillon PLLC 1401 K Street NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 (2021640-4427 On Oct 14, 2018, at 11:49 PM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote: Here is my basic reworking of yours.. The OEI paragraph is now short, and Erin herself is not mentioned explicitly. I did include the other list as I say, because none of these were in my appeal letter.. but I shortened them. What was the highlighting and bolding for? EFTA01019611 Thanks. 0,11K Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, M. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: 480.965.6378 I Assistant (Jessica): 480.965.9825kraussOasu.edu On Oct 14, 2018, at 8:20 PM, Lawrence Krauss < wrote: Thanks.. there is a lot about this I like.. I am concerned about removing all the dashed items.. most of them never made it into my appeal letter and are actually complaints about actions of his administration that I have never mentioned in anything before.. I do feel the need to inform him of these.. I will think about Erin section.. I want to say more than you have, but perhaps less than I had. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, M. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287.1404 Research Office: 480.965.6378 I Assistant (Jessica): 480.965.9825kraussOasu.edu On Oct 14, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Justin Dillon < wrote: <retirementletter2--jd redline.docx> <retirementletter2--jd redlinelmk.docx> EFTA01019612
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
47ecbec4c525892214e071459f7e3414d26038617886aba94cd4cf0b24420a23
Bates Number
EFTA01019611
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!