👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,257 words)
From: "Al seckel"
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: I'm up. Call when you wish.
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:53:52 +0000
Fun and smart is perfect, and then the emphasis doesn't just have to be on the useful and practical.
This would alter my suggestions that I sent somewhat.
Just off the top of my head, I could help arrange this event to be unique, interesting and way fun. There needs to
be an element of play.
My suggestion would be do create an event which makes the social networking far easier, take it off the egos,
and makes it more fun and experiential, so that the normal groupings of individuals who know each other are
immediately broken down, and there is full and furtile cross-pollinization.
Also, given the nature of this, potential attendees would give a lot of creative thought to "wowing" the audience.
Evening fun ideas (this is in addition to a program):
First day
One idea would be that everyone is required to bring an "interesting object." They will need to go before the
group and give a 1 minute presentation of why their object is interesting. People would enjoy this, and you will
see some fun things, but it is not a competition.
Second day
"Speed to Cool" The idea is to have presentations where you get the audience to say "cool" or "wow" in as little
time as possible. Again, people would see and hear some fun things.
Got to run to a meeting, will talk later. ;-)
From: Jeffrey E in <*[email protected]>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 8:34:26 AM
Subject: Re: I'm up. Call when you wish.
i tired „ sorry
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Al seckel > wrote:
I tried calling but got your machine.
Call when you wish:
From: Jeffrey E in < [email protected]>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent Friday, April 17, 2009 1:48:34 PM
Subject Re: A little thought to thinkers...
im in from 9 ny time what works for you
EFTA00774068
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Al seckel < wrote:
I am at a meeting from 9 - 12 pm. pct. Either before or after will work. Let me know what's best for you.
From: Jeffrey E ein <"[email protected]>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 1:44:03 PM
Subject: Re: A little thought to thinkers...
tomorrow
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Al seckel < > wrote:
Are you available to talk about this some more?
What would you like to come out of this?
Is there a focus?
Do you want some really fun smart people too?
From: Jeeyacation <•eevacation@ mail.wm>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:22:09 AM
Subject: Re: A little thought to thinkers...
I agree
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Al seckel < > wrote:
Jeff,
Good to talk to you this morning on this subject, as it is one I am entirely comfortable with. ;-)
The list I sent you yesterday has the criteria of thinkers, out of the box. These are amongst the very
brightest people that I know, where I enjoy listening to them, and they say insightful things along with a
deep understanding of the subject matter. Intellectual judgment along with intellectual ability. The two
don't always go hand-in-hand. This is also a list of people who have a certain type of intelligence, but
may not necessarily have social intelligence, i.e, they are a bit awkward.
Jay is incredibly skilled socially compared to some of the people on this list. Just fyi. I personally am not
bothered by social awkwardness, but this is your thing, and you would like a good mix, and that is
understandable. Criteria will just be different then.
You brought up Jay. This is a good example. Jay does listen, and then tends to offer up his own views. I
very much enjoy interacting with Jay, and he is a close friend, and although I may not always agree with
him, he does always offer up ideas that are interesting and worth thinking about. That's why I put him on
the list. He has a certain way he maps the world and he is also very well read and informed. This is not
an argument about Jay, just why I put him on the list. I would also put Nathan in the same category as
Jay. Doesn't listen much, pontificates, don't always agree with what he says, but he tends to say things
that are provocative and interesting. He has an interesting way of mapping the world too, and is well
EFTA00774069
read and informed. I enjoy bantering with both of them, and count them as real friends that I have known
and hung out with for many years.
Some of the names listed are titans of intellectual ego. Steven Wolfram being amongst the worst of them.
Others are very shy and socially and fashion awkward, but are amongst the very brightest and informed
that I know, and will run intellectual circles around some of the names on this list.
I very much like the idea of your asking people on this list to contribute names of the ten "brightest"
people that they know. This list would provide an excellent set of references.
Please note, that although I have a diversity of thinkers, I have distinctly avoided people who map the
world in a magical way, and would encourage us to avoid "magical thinkers."
From: Jeevacation <'eevacation® mail.com>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:16:16 AM
Subject: Re: Re:
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2009, at 6:33 PM, Al seckel < > wrote:
Anyone you don't know on an immediate list, ask me or google them. All are good friends of mine for
years, but these very high end circles travel together, so you should be very familiar with almost all of
them. And, a few that you don't know, are off the charts, and in some respects smarter than the ones
that are familiar... ;-) They just didn't seek the limelight. I have marked these people with an asterisk.
Not everyone on this list is a scientist.
There is no order to this list (this is a cross-section off the top of my head). I can think of more names if
I put my mind to it, but lets start here:
I am happy to discuss anyone here
Nathan Mhyrvold
*Catherine Mohr
*Jay Walker
Christof Koch
*Terry Sejnowski
Danny Hillis
*Bran Ferren
Vilamur Ramachandran
Lisa Randall
Frances Arnold
Jesse Dylan
EFTA00774070
Larry Page
Elon Musk
Stephen Wolfram
Steve Juvertson
*Pablo Ho
Jaron Lanier
Craig Venter
paul Kirkaas
Yossi Vardi
*Eric Mjolsness
*Mike Douglas
Dean Kamen
*Shelly Glashow
*Derrick Ashong
James Cameron
*Ronald Crowley
*Jeffrey Lehman
Christine Maxwell
*Brock Pierce
*Rich Roberts
*Lee Stein
*Gerry Sussman
*John Conway
Dan Dubno (just because he is very interesting)
From: Jeffrey E ein <•Sa w@g i mail.com>
To: Al seckel < >
Sent Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:56:34 PM
Subject: Re:
of course
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Al seckel < > wrote:
Ah, you have actually asked my speciality. Seriously. Ok, different disciplines and business too?
From: Jeffrey E ein <'eevacationegmail.com>
To: AI seckel < >
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:52:54 PM
Subject:
could you give me a list of who you think would enjoy a get together in florida„ smart , out of the
box types
EFTA00774071
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
49119c731fdf989c59b9dfe40d40593e441ff1ea5d07edbbdf6305a8f6f548df
Bates Number
EFTA00774068
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0