EFTA00774275
EFTA00774276 DataSet-9
EFTA00774277

EFTA00774276.pdf

DataSet-9 1 page 182 words document
D2 P17 V16 P19
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (182 words)
From: "Martin Weinberg" To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:25:01 +0000 Attachments: Crimes_and_Criminal_Procedure_-_18_USC_Section_2255_-_US_Code.pdf Putting aside NPA, and your arguably involuntary waivers, anyone can suit in federal court relying on claims of 2255 i.e. Congress has conferred civil jurisdiction on private parties claiming injury due to violations of the various predicates. The issue is whether they can meet their burdens of proof. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Original message from Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>: since the josephbug people are suing in federal court though there is no diversity.. and they have not brought up the npa, do we leave it , without a fight over jurisdiction which is dealt with in the npa, or raise it at somepointl EFTA00774276
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
49190dba9b8ecacee1898f0e81e864ee64db2b28150eb0b8cdfbdf4ada197798
Bates Number
EFTA00774276
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!