​Correct The Record Friday January 30, 2015 Afternoon Roundup

podesta-emails 4,335 words email

D6 P17 V11 V9 P23

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Friday January 30, 2015 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@RepHastingsFL <https://twitter.com/RepHastingsFL/> in @SunSentinel <https://twitter.com/SunSentinel/>: @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/> has the "strong vision [and] strong record" to be president. sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commen… <http://t.co/tRsi1q9QOG> [1/30/15, 8:57 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/561161205306253312>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/>'s "devotion to improving the lives of others" is "admirable and inspiring," says @RepHastingsFL <https://twitter.com/RepHastingsFL/> sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commen… <http://t.co/tRsi1q9QOG> [1/30/15, 9:51 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/561174769370800130>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: "Run, Hillary, Run" - @RepHastingsFL <https://twitter.com/RepHastingsFL/> writes in @SunSentinel <https://twitter.com/SunSentinel/> why he'll back@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/> if she runs in 2016 sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commen… <http://t.co/tRsi1q9QOG> [1/30/15, 10:56 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/561191157628030979>] *Headlines:* *BuzzFeed: Ready For Hillary Ramps Up Its Outreach To Faith Leaders <http://www.buzzfeed.com/darrensands/ready-for-hillary-ramps-up-its-outreach-to-faith-leaders?utm_term=.wpJzNJXA1#.mijmGGrP3>* “Ready for Hillary, the political action committee that raised $12 million in 2014 in anticipation of Hillary Clinton’s announcement to run for president in 2016, has been reaching out to faith groups this month.” ... "In addition to Burns Strider, senior adviser to Clinton in her 2008 campaign for faith and values outreach and the Rev. Leah Daughtry, Joshua DuBois, former head of the White House Office of Faith Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, joined to discuss what the Obama campaign built in 2008." *CNN: Jim Webb: Democrats need to focus more on 'white, working people' <http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/30/politics/jim-webb-white-working-people/index.html>* “Like other Democrats toiling about a presidential run, Webb declined to directly attack Clinton.” *Washington Post: Rand Paul tweets fake phone call between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton. Internet yawns. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/01/30/rand-paul-tweets-fake-phone-call-between-jeb-bush-and-hillary-clinton-internet-yawns/>* “He tweeted out a fake phone call between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton that hits them on their dynastic roots. Yes, the son of a three-time presidential candidate/Texas Congressman is hitting someone else for coming from a political family.” *Bloomberg View: Hillary Clinton's Late Start Won't Stop the Punches <http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-30/hillary-clinton-s-late-start-won-t-stop-the-punches>* “So Hillary Clinton is thinking about delaying the start of her presidential campaign until the summer, according to Politico's Mike Allen. As a strategic move, this makes sense to me: Why spend money and time getting a head start in a race where she has no credible opponent?” *Washington Examiner: American Crossroads takes aim at Hillary Clinton, stays out of GOP primary <http://american%20crossroads%20takes%20aim%20at%20hillary%20clinton%2C%20stays%20out%20of%20gop%20primary/>* “American Crossroads is coming for Hillary Clinton, and soon. The premiere Republican-aligned super PAC plans to spend many months targeting the likely Democratic presidential nominee before the Republicans have chosen a candidate.” *Bloomberg: How Bored Are Reporters by the Clinton Restoration? <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-01-30/how-bored-are-reporters-by-the-clinton-restoration->* “Very, very bored… The most in-your-face evidence this week came in the Washington Post and the New York Times, both of which published big, fun take-outs by two of their best writers on presidential campaigns that are not happening—but, you know, if they did, would really roil the Hillary Clinton juggernaut.” *Articles:* *BuzzFeed: Ready For Hillary Ramps Up Its Outreach To Faith Leaders <http://www.buzzfeed.com/darrensands/ready-for-hillary-ramps-up-its-outreach-to-faith-leaders?utm_term=.wpJzNJXA1#.mijmGGrP3>* By Darren Sands January 30, 2015 12:12 p.m. EST [Subtitle:] It went much better than another recent meeting between Democratic leadership and black clergy, sources say. WASHINGTON — Ready for Hillary, the political action committee that raised $12 million in 2014 in anticipation of Hillary Clinton’s announcement to run for president in 2016, has been reaching out to faith groups this month. Just hours before the State of the Union address on Jan. 20, Ready for Hillary held an introductory call to rally clergy — many who supported Obama in the 2008 primary election — on what role they might play in 2016. In addition to Burns Strider, senior adviser to Clinton in her 2008 campaign for faith and values outreach and the Rev. Leah Daughtry, Joshua DuBois, former head of the White House Office of Faith Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, joined to discuss what the Obama campaign built in 2008. The faith community was instrumental “in moving the needle, and taking the temperature of the American people” in 2008, DuBois said, according to a source. Outreach to the black faith community has played a significant role in the Obama administration, though not all Democratic outreach has gone smoothly recently. Months before the Ready for Hillary call, a similar kind of meeting — this one in Washington, D.C. — between national Democrats didn’t go as planned. Three sources confirmed a meeting between black clergy members and DNC leadership, including DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, took place at the Democratic National Committee last month. The group, one source said, felt slighted that DNC leaders seemed to differ on the level of importance placed on the meeting; another source said DNC leaders showed up to the meeting late and left early. A DNC official confirmed the meeting in a email statement BuzzFeed News, but said the departure was related to Wasserman Schultz’s other role. “We value these relationships highly but the congresswoman was pulled out of the meeting on congressional business,” the official said. “She followed up with the attendees immediately and maintains a dialogue with those in attendance.” Barbara Williams-Skinner, president of Skinner Leadership Institute, a leadership conference for black ministers, confirmed her own attendance at the meeting but did not want to rehash the particulars. “It’s just not helpful,” she said. “We’re trying to do something positive and we’ve got a big agenda of advancing African-American interests. You’re bringing up old stuff that was just a misunderstanding.” The call with clergy leaders with Ready for Hillary “didn’t feel like it was reactive to anything,” said a source with direct knowledge of the Jan. 20 call. “It would was more pulling back and refocusing on who Secretary Clinton is and how she is setting an independent agenda.” “African-American pastors did a lot of getting out the vote, not just for candidates but for progressive issues as well,” said a Democratic political operative with strong ties to faith-based organizations across the nation. “I think, beyond that, they want to think about what the party’s relationship is with them. Party officials want to know what concerns they’re hearing from people in the pews. They want to know how they can be more responsive to concerns.” Quentin James, black Americans director for Ready for Hillary, who confirmed the political action committee’s outreach to ministers, said building a coalition of faith leaders around issues early is key for Hillary Clinton’s momentum should she decide to run this spring. “The purpose of our call was to start our outreach to the faith community because we realize they’re going to play a very important role in determining the next president of the United States,” he said. “Secretary Clinton has a long history for working closely with that community, so as we’re organizing, we know we must engage them in this movement.” *CNN: Jim Webb: Democrats need to focus more on 'white, working people' <http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/30/politics/jim-webb-white-working-people/index.html>* By Dan Merica January 30, 2015 Washington (CNN) If Jim Webb had his way, the Democratic Party would return to its "Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Andrew Jackson roots" and put a greater focus on "white, working people." Webb, the former Democratic senator from Virginia who is entertaining a run 2016 presidential nomination, told NPR Friday morning that his party has not focused enough on white, working class voters in the past elections. In order to be successful in the future, Webb said, that will need to change. "I think they could do better with white, working people and I think this last election showed that," Webb said, referencing the 2014 midterms where Republicans took control of the Senate and added more power in the House. "The Democratic Party could do very well to return to its Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Andrew Jackson roots where the focus of the party was making sure that all people who lack a voice in the corridors of power could have one through the elected represented." Pressed on his statement by NPR's Steve Inskeep, Webb said that he doesn't think Democrats' distancing from white, working people was a byproduct of President Barack Obama's election. "This was happening before President Obama," Webb said. Looking ahead to a 2016 race that he may run in, Webb added: "You are not going to have a situation again where you have 96% of the African American vote turning out for one presidential candidate. ... We need to get back to the principles of the Democratic Party that we are going to give everyone who needs access to the corridors of power that access regardless of any of your antecedents. I think that is a fair concept." In 2012, the last presidential election, Republican Mitt Romney won nearly 60% of all white voters, compared to Obama's 40%. That difference is an increased split from 2008, when Obama won 43% of the white vote and Republican John McCain won 55%. If Webb were to enter the 2016 presidential race, he would do so as a longshot candidate. Not only would he likely be challenging Hillary Clinton for the 2016 nomination, but he told Inskeep that raising money would be a big challenge. Like other Democrats toiling about a presidential run, Webb declined to directly attack Clinton. "I really don't have an answer for you on that," he said when asked how he would differentiate himself with the former secretary of state. "She has not announced that she is running, I haven't announced that I am running. If I were to run, it would not be as a counterpoint to her. I have issues that I care about, I want to put them on the table and we'll see." *Washington Post: Rand Paul tweets fake phone call between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton. Internet yawns. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/01/30/rand-paul-tweets-fake-phone-call-between-jeb-bush-and-hillary-clinton-internet-yawns/>* By Nia-Malika Henderson January 30, 2016 9:16 a.m. EST Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) seems not so much to be running for President, but King of the Internet or King of Silly Snark instead. The latest? He tweeted out a fake phone call between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton that hits them on their dynastic roots. Yes, the son of a three-time presidential candidate/Texas Congressman is hitting someone else for coming from a political family. You see, Paul really doesn't like that the same candidates run again and again and thinks the American public shouldn't either. (Sidenote: Ron Paul ran for president in 1988, 2008 and 2012.) As for the phone call here's the "transcript" (or listen here): BUSH: “Hey, Hill. It’s Jeb.” CLINTON: “Hey, Jeb. To what do I owe this pleasure?” BUSH: “Well, it’s true. I’m thinking about running for president.” CLINTON: “Well, Jeb, so am I.” BUSH: “I just wanted to call and give you a heads-up in hopes we could work something out.” CLINTON: “What do you mean, Jeb? It’s clearly my turn: Bush, Clinton, Bush. Now, Clinton.” BUSH: “Well, Hillary, there hasn’t been a Republican White House without a Bush since 1977, and we’re ready to be back.” CLINTON: “Let me shoot straight with you, Jeb, OK? Bill and I are dead broke and need a place to stay. 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is calling me home. I’ve still got the back door key. Being president offers a lot more job security than writing another memoir.” BUSH: “Well, the Bushes have weathered attacks before. And read my lips, Hillary: We’re not backing down this time.” CLINTON: “Well, you’re right. Maybe we can work something out. We both agree on so many issues: bigger government, Common Core, and amnesty for illegal immigrants.” BUSH: “Well, we’ve both got problems. You’ve got problems with the grass roots, and I’ve got all those damn conservatives. What say, we make a deal?” (Call beeps in.) BUSH: “Sorry, Hillary, but I have to go. Mitt keeps calling.” CLINTON: “Oh, for crying out loud.” First off, kudos to the woman voicing Clinton, she really nails it. But really, the question for Paul, is why? Why bother? Why the snark? Especially over having a name that's famous in presidential politics? Someone at Paul's political action committee thought this was a good idea. Perhaps it would go viral. Perhaps the youngsters on the Twitter would love it. Maybe it would make Paul seem hip. But the pursuit of cool never ends well. Some Twitter reviews that should worry the Paul camp: (That last one comes from someone who has sent 51,000 tweets.) We've written before about how Paul is like a boxer in the ring taking swings at everyone in sight. He is expending a lot of time and energy and the race hasn't even really started yet. Paul wants to maintain his image as "the most interesting man in politics," yet the fights and Internet gimmicks make him look undisciplined and less than serious. There's a fine line between being clever and childish and Paul seems to be teetering on the edge. *Bloomberg View: Hillary Clinton's Late Start Won't Stop the Punches <http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-30/hillary-clinton-s-late-start-won-t-stop-the-punches>* By Megan McArdle January 30, 2015 1:18 p.m. EST So Hillary Clinton is thinking about delaying the start of her presidential campaign until the summer, according to Politico's Mike Allen. As a strategic move, this makes sense to me: Why spend money and time getting a head start in a race where she has no credible opponent? All this could possibly do is give her time to make gaffes and give her opponents insights they could use to get a jump on their campaigns against her. Of course, they'll be doing that anyway. All across the land, there are nameless moles digging through Clinton's every utterance ... every Gawker post, every speech video and high school term paper. And at every campaign office, people are even now mapping out the strategies that our presidential hopefuls will use to run against her. The advantage of being the front-runner is that she has all the money locked up, and she won't need to run to her left in the primaries in order to placate the base. The disadvantage is that she has no idea who she is running against, while everyone else knows exactly what they will be fighting. They'll have over a year to lock in their message -- no, better than that, they'll be able to start their campaigns against her during the primaries, while she can't mount an effective response until she knows who her opponent will be. Any rejoinder she makes before then will only serve to raise the profile of the people making the most effective criticisms. Meanwhile, she'll need to spread her opposition research across multiple candidates, while all of theirs is laser-focused on her. To be sure, she'll also benefit from the research they do on each other. But of course, the winning candidate will also have the benefit of everyone else's anti-Hillary research operations -- and they're more likely to pool their research for the general campaign, while they probably won't be sharing any unused tidbits with the Democrats. Overall, I wonder if this early lead won't ultimately turn out to be a disadvantage, not just because the candidates will be focused on her, but because the public will be, too. By the time she actually gets around to running against an opponent, she will already largely be defined in the public mind, and not by her side. People will have been listening to Republican campaigns talking about Hillary Clinton more than they'll have been listening to her talk about herself. Her best hope is a bruising primary season from which the Republican victor staggers forward, bloody and battered and ready for Clinton to deliver the killing blow. That wouldn't exactly be surprising, given the last race. But I suspect that by then, Clinton will be nursing a few wounds herself. *Washington Examiner: American Crossroads takes aim at Hillary Clinton, stays out of GOP primary <http://american%20crossroads%20takes%20aim%20at%20hillary%20clinton%2C%20stays%20out%20of%20gop%20primary/>* By David M. Drucker January 30, 2015 5:00 a.m. EST American Crossroads is coming for Hillary Clinton, and soon. The premiere Republican-aligned super PAC plans to spend many months targeting the likely Democratic presidential nominee before the Republicans have chosen a candidate. According to the PAC's president and CEO, Steven Law, American Crossroads will start off with opposition research and polling. Paid advertising to undermine Clinton's candidacy will come later. Law detailed the approach of American Crossroads, which was formed in 2010 by former White House strategist Karl Rove, during an interview with the Washington Examiner. Rather than indiscriminate attacks, Law's 2016 goal is to digest and analyze all of the information American Crossroads compiles on President Obama’s former secretary of state, and chart a disciplined, competent battle plan that doesn’t backfire on Republicans. “My concern about Hillary is that [there] are new micro groups starting up on almost a weekly basis, all which have as their mission to destroy Hillary, and I worry that there’s potentially a thin line that could be crossed from somebody being a pariah and somebody being a victim,” Law said. “A surgical approach is a lot more effective than just carpet-bombing, and so we’re going to try to develop a sense of doctrine ourselves about what the most effective way would be to challenge her and the right timing for that and the right messages and the right audience.” American Crossroads, which is still advised on an unpaid basis by Rove, picked sides in a few Senate primaries in 2014, supporting so-called Establishment candidates. But Law confirmed that the super PAC would not play in the 2016 presidential primary, instead husbanding its resources for the fight against Clinton. The launch this month of Senate Leadership Fund, a dedicated super PAC to support Republican Senate candidates in 2016, also run by Law, frees up American Crossroads to attend more exclusively to the presidential contest. The Republican field of potential White House candidates is crowded with sitting senators, sitting governors, former governors and private sector entrants. The primary could be a super slugfest for the next 15 months, with a presumed nominee possibly not emerging until April of 2016, just three months before the GOP’s national convention kicks off in Cleveland on July 18. Federal law prohibits presumed nominees from accessing funds raised for the general election prior to being officially crowned as the party standard bearer at the nominating convention. American Crossroads is focused on filling the void between then and now, an 18-month period. Law wants American Crossroads to help prevent a repeat of 2012, when GOP nominee Mitt Romney had trouble defending against Obama’s attacks over the summer because he couldn’t use money he’d raised for November. Law said American Crossroads has a projected budget for the presidential race but would only describe it as “plenty.” The group has a mixed record on effectiveness. American Crossroads and its nonprofit sister organization, Crossroads GPS, spent $50 million on direct advocacy in House and Senate races in the 2014 cycle, which ended with decisive GOP gains in both chambers; but it also spent more than $85 million against Obama in 2012, which came to nothing as the president handily defeated Romney and his party picked up seats. Law is still considering the best way for American Crossroads to make an impact in 2016. “It’ll be important for groups like ours,” Law said, “to fill the interregnum period between when the nominee is selected by our party and when they’re actually able to step into the ring.” Law said American Crossroads and other entities were active on this front in 2012, but he believes they missed a critical strategic element that might have helped Romney: positive ads to build up the Republican, not just attack ads seeking to tear down the Democrat. “The part that was not present [in 2012] that I think everyone would have to take a hard look at is defending the nominee as opposed to defining the opponent. That’s something that I think everybody’s going to have to sort through,” Law said. *Bloomberg: How Bored Are Reporters by the Clinton Restoration? <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-01-30/how-bored-are-reporters-by-the-clinton-restoration->* By David Weigel January 30, 2015 10:52 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] Fantasy campaigns break out across America. Very, very bored. On a boredom scale of "Michael Bay action scene" to "Ingmar Bergman dinner scene," we are somewhere near that part of Shame in which Liv Ullman and Max Von Sydow eat potatoes. The most in-your-face evidence this week came in the Washington Post and the New York Times, both of which published big, fun take-outs by two of their best writers on presidential campaigns that are not happening—but, you know, if they did, would really roil the Hillary Clinton juggernaut. On Wednesday, the Post's Ben Terris asked why Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown was not being promoted by progressives for a 2016 bid. The answer, midway through the piece, was the same as it had been for years: "He’s an older white guy." A Democratic Party that has made up for losses with white male voters by stronger identity politics and turnout with everyone else was not inclined to block the first serious female presidential candidate with a white guy. (At 62, Brown is just five years younger than Hillary Clinton.) Brown really didn't sound bothered by it. "I don’t say, ‘I’m not running now,’" he told Terris. "I don’t know what it is. I know you don’t believe this, but I don’t really think about it all that much." The big question in Terris's piece was why progressive groups were boosting Elizabeth Warren (who is 65) instead of Brown. The cynical reason, that Warren is better for building lists of names and raising money, was elided. The progressive movement-building is a larger part of Amy Chozick's "Hillary Clinton vs. Elizabeth Warren Could Delight Republicans," the news hook of which is the much-hyped wave of "Run Warren Run" happening this weekend. Chozick focuses on a few undeniable facts. One: Clinton has struggled to adapt to the populism embodied by Warren and Brown, and Republicans are still mocking her for muffing a line about how "corporations don't create jobs" when campaigning at the same event as Warren. (She meant "tax breaks for corporations," which still doesn't sound like her.) Republicans and progressives have tried to brand the woman who lapped Barack Obama with working-class white Democrats as a rich banister, and the branding has sort of worked. Two: Republicans, facing a cacophonous primary currently led by 1) the loser of the 2012 presidential race, 2) the brother of the unpopular last Republican president, 3) a neurosurgeon, and 4) the senator son of the GOP's iconic gold bug and isolationist, would really like the Democrats to join them in disarray. Chozick quotes Mike Huckabee, Michele Bachmann, Rush Limbaugh, the editor of the Arkansas Project's own American Spectator, and the executive director of America Rising, the conservative PAC that tracks Democrats and has been trolling Warren to enter the race against Clinton. (A sample: "Warren Takes Shots at Clinton in Key AFL-CIO Speech.") The assumption is not that Warren would beat Clinton. That's smart: There's little evidence that she could. A Fox News poll released this week has been covered as worrying for Clinton, as her total support from Democrats (the 390 polled by Fox, anyway) had fallen from a high of 69 percent to a post-State Department low of ... 55 percent. Her nearest rival was not Warren, but Vice President Joe Biden; they polled at 12 percent and 17 percent respectively. If Clinton decided against a run, the frontrunner would be Biden, not Warren, with a 37-21 lead. For comparison, at this point in the 2008 cycle, the week Clinton actually entered that race and John Kerry abandoned it, Fox emerged with a poll showing Clinton's strongest numbers—43 percent against the field. Barack Obama, who was not as well known with Democrats then as Biden is now, polled at 15 percent. But 2008, exciting as it was, was not a policy contest that dragged any Democrat to an extreme. That's the conservative theory of goading a progressive to challenge Hillary—and it's based on a calcified idea of what the "extremes" are. In this theory, a law professor who was once registered Republican is more "left-wing" than Saul Alinsky scholar Hillary Clinton or socialist conference attendee Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton's fumbling attempt to say the tax code shouldn't include corporate giveaways was like a lost verse from L'Internationale. As we all know, attacking corporations and saying they benefit from the tax code is left-wing. Hang on. What was it Sarah Palin said in Iowa a few years ago? Casting herself as the ultimate outsider, the former Alaska governor used a Tea Party rally to chastise the President and a “permanent political class” that she said has protected their powers and enriched them, their friends, and their contributors at the expense of ordinary Americans and the country’s well-being. “There is a name for this,” Palin said. “It’s called corporate crony capitalism. It’s not the capitalism of free men and free markets, of innovation and hard work and ethics, of sacrifice and of risk. No, this is the capitalism of connections and government bailouts and handouts . . . and influence peddling and corporate welfare.” When Sarah Palin says the political system is rigged for corporations, it's Tea Party populism. When Elizabeth Warren says it, it's red-flag socialism. Isn't it more likely that both are explicating a popular political concept, and that both parties are going to try to perfect that in 2016? If so, the idea that Hillary Clinton would hurt herself by unconvincingly appealing to the left is sound. Right now, Democratic voters mostly want her to be president, and the left is not trying to make her as much as it's trying to make the Democrats understand how popular this rhetoric is.