📄 Extracted Text (289 words)
Ami, Jay:
Please include in the Draft an explanation of the following to refute MV's allegation
that JEE refused to promptly fulfill his obligation to secure the services of the
attorney representative:
In the last full paragraph on page 2 of 4 of Marie's letter to JL, RB and JG, MV writes:
"Mr. Epstein refused to fulfill promptly Mr. Epstein's obligation to secure the
services of an attorney representative for the victims."
However, in MV's Supplemental Declaration, dated December 22, 2008, in the 3771
case, Marie states on page 3, paragraph 9 that Marie prepared a corrected victim
notification letter and worked with Mr. Epstein's counsel to resolve certain issues
related to the implementation only of "Parts 1 and 2" [referring to the NPA and the
Addendum]. Those issues were resolved on September 2, 2008 and September 3,
2008.
On September 8, 2008, Jay Lefkowitz sent a letter to Bob Josefsberg advising
Josefsberg that Jeffrey will pay attorney representative for fees associated with
consideration of and subsequent settlement of potential 2255 claims and requesting
that Josefsberg forward current and future bills to Jay that relate to such work and
Jay will arrange for payment, but that we reserve the right in the future to submit
bills to a neutral 3rd party for review, though at present Jay wrote there is no need
for such a procedure.
Copies of the Supplemental Declaration and September 8, 2008 letter are attached
to demonstrate that JEE did not refuse to promptly fulfill his obligations to secure
the services of the attorney representative. Promptly after resolution of certain
issues relating to the attorney representative provided for in the NPA and
Addendum, Jay sent the letter confirming that JEE will pay the attorney
representative.
EFTA00727525
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
4ce84d3b32fa53b2ad3ca40b45aadc9c78e0a3c2b955eb21b3b23dc9aa19fa7b
Bates Number
EFTA00727525
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0