📄 Extracted Text (1,317 words)
Filing # 70782801 E-Filed 04/16/2018 04:50:24 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
VS.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
Defendant,
MOTION TO PERMIT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO TAKE THE LIMITED
DEPOSITION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Bradley J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to this Court's
Order on Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines dated November 27, 2017, hereby files
this Motion to Permit Bradley J. Edwards to Take the Limited Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, and
as grounds therefor states as follows:
The March 8. 2018 State Court Hearing
I. In early March 2018, only days before the expected trial date, Epstein designated
700+ new trial exhibits in this case. Included in that disclosure were at least 49 e-mail
communications that had been listed on Edwards' privilege log since 2011 and which had never
been produced in this case. The e-mails were derived from a disc possessed by Epstein's former
counsel, Fowler White.
EFTA00793947
2. At the March 8, 2018 hearing, the Court orally ruled that all new exhibits were
stricken and that Epstein is "prohibited from making any use of the 724 late-disclosed exhibits."
318/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 59:15-21.'
3. During the hearing, it was revealed that Epstein (as a party) had already received
copies of at least some of the privileged materials, and Edwards raised his concern that Epstein
may seek to improperly use his knowledge of Edwards' privileged materials through his own
testimony at trial. kt 3/8/18 Aft. Tr. at 64:14-19; 63:13-23.
4. The Court, however, made clear that its order was intended to "preclude anything
coming in through the back door which wouldn't be allowed through the front door." 3/8/18 Aft.
Tr. at 76:3-6.
5. The discs containing privileged materials and all information derived from the discs
was ordered to be turned over to the Court and sealed or destroyed. While representations have
been made by counsel regarding Epstein's compliance with that directive, Epstein has not himself
confirmed compliance nor provided any sworn testimony regarding his knowledge of, possession,
dissemination or use of the privileged documents or information derived from the documents.
The April 13, 2018 Bankruptcy Court Hearing
6. On April 13, 2018, a hearing was held before Judge Ray concerning Fowler White
and Epstein's improper retention of the disc at issue, which Edwards contends is in violation of
Judge Ray's Order dated November 30, 2011. At the hearing, Judge Ray permitted certain
discovery to take place to determine the scope of the violation of that court's order, including the
taking of Epstein's deposition.
I The Court recognized that the privileged materials at issue were likely subject to an order from Judge Raymound B.
Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 3/8/18 Afternoon Session Tr. at 52:6-19; 54:9-20.
EFTA00793948
7. Pursuant to Judge Ray's Order, Edwards is permitted to depose Epstein in Palm
Beach County concerning Epstein's knowledge of Fowler White's retention of the disc at issue.
This line of inquiry includes whether Epstein had possession of the disc at any point prior to
February 2018, when his trial counsel first learned of its contents.
Edwards' Request to Depose Epstein
8. Epstein will soon be in Palm Beach County for a deposition in the Bankruptcy
Court proceeding concerning whether he possessed the Fowler White disc in violation of that
court's order.
9. Edwards also seeks to depose Epstein in this case concerning Epstein's knowledge,
use, possession and distribution of the privileged materials, whether via disc or electronic copy,
which this Court has ruled may not be used in any way by Epstein at the upcoming trial. In addition,
Edwards seeks to confirm Epstein's knowledge of Judge Ray's Order and the timing of when he
first acquired that knowledge. In recent filings, Epstein has again conceded to having received and
reviewed at least some e-mails listed on Edwards' privilege log prior to the March 8ih hearing. See
3/23/18 Epstein's Notice of Compliance with Court Rulings at p. 2. Although Epstein's trial
counsel ordered its client to comply with the Court's confidentiality order by "destroy[ing] all hard
copies and electronic versions of the documents obtained from the [Fowler White] disc," there is
no indication that Epstein has complied with this instruction. See a
10. Edwards therefore seeks to depose Epstein to determine the extent of his review of
Edwards' privileged materials, the timing of that review, the identity of all persons with whom
Epstein shared the privileged materials or its contents, as well as all other topics reasonably
necessary to allow Edwards to identify and object to at trial all attempts by Epstein to utilize
Edwards' privileged materials in violation of this Court's March 8, 2018 ruling. Edwards further
EFTA00793949
seeks to confirm that Epstein has in fact destroyed all copies of these materials, as ordered by the
Court at the March 8ih hearing. Discovery of this limited nature is necessary to ensure that this
Court's order precluding "anything coming in through the back door that wouldn't be allowed
through the front" is enforced.
11. Edwards recognizes that, on November 27, 2017, this Court entered its Order on
Motion to Reconfirm Existing Pretrial Deadlines, in which it ordered that wholesale additional
discovery would not be permitted and that individual discovery requests may be allowed on a
matter by matter basis, but only if the discovery requests are impacted by the Court's rulings on
certain motions currently pending to be heard.
12. Edwards concedes that this individual discovery request was not impacted by the
Court's ruling on any motion that was pending at the time the Order on Motion to Reconfirm
Existing Pretrial Deadlines was entered, but submits that the need for this discovery arose out of
the recent events previous described and that there is no undue prejudice to Epstein to permit this
limited discovery because it was Epstein's actions in violating this Court's pre-trial order
concerning the timeliness of exhibit disclosures (as well as his violation of Judge Ray's Order
concerning the retention and possession of the privileged materials at issue), which necessitated
the need for the limited discovery sought herein outside of the discovery deadline.
WHEREFORE, Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, respectfully requests that the Court
enter an Order granting this Motion to Permit Bradley J. Edwards to Take the Limited Deposition
of Jeffrey Epstein, as well as awarding any such further relief as the Court deems just and proper
given the circumstances.
EFTA00793950
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve
to all Counsel on the attached list, this 16ih day of April, 2017.
/s/ David P. Vita& Jr.
JACK SCAROLA
Florida Bar No.: 169440
KAREN E. TERRY
Florida Bar No.: 45780
DAVID P. VITALE JR.
Florida Bar No.: 115179
Attorne E-Mail s : and
Primary E-Mail:
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone
Fax:
Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards
EFTA00793951
COUNSEL LIST
Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire
425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Pho
Fax:
Jack A. Goldberler Es. uire
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Pho
Fax:
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Nichole J. Se al, Es. uire
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A.
444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350
West Palm Beach FL 33401
Phone:
Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards
Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esquire
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Pho
Fax:
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Scott J. Link, Esquire
cots
Link & Rockenbach, P.A.
1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
Suite 301
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Pho
Fax:
EFTA00793952
Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
Marc S. Nurik Es uire
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phon
Fax:
Attorneys or cots of tein
EFTA00793953
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
4ec2fdfbc0c07e2073bc77e9aeaf17a0e46551f27504848be56e543d2de5a446
Bates Number
EFTA00793947
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
7
Comments 0