📄 Extracted Text (1,662 words)
From: "McCaffrey, Carlyn" <
To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" ccjeervacation(dismail.com>
Subject: FYI
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:26:56 +0000
Inline-Images: image019.png; image020.png; image021.png; image022.png; image023.png; image024.png;
image025.jpg; image026.png; image027.png
Transfers of Property Between Settlor and Grantor Trust Subject to New York Sales Tax
Citations: TSB-A-14(6)S; Petition No. S131007A
Summary by IIIIKailalysts
The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance explained that when a settlor transfers property
to a grantor trust or a revocable living trust in exchange for trust property, the transfer is subject to sales tax
because an exchange has been made between two separate entities, even if there is no negotiation and
the transfer is not supported by consideration.
Full Text Published by taxanalystS
Sales Tax
January 29, 2014
ADVISORY OPINION
The Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for an Advisory Opinion from ' name and
address redacted " ' . Petitioner requests guidance on whether the substitution of property between
himself and the trust is subject to sales and use taxes in New York.
We conclude that the Petitioner and the trust are separate taxpayers capable of entering into a sale. Any
substitution of property between the two entities would be a sale, because it would constitute a transfer of
title or possession for consideration. Therefore, sales and use taxes are due on any substitution of property
transferred between the Petitioner and the trust.
Facts
Petitioner (the "Settlor") created an irrevocable trust (the "Trust") pursuant to a trust agreement between
the Trustees and the Settlor. The Settlor is deemed to own the Trust property for Federal and New York
State income tax purposes, as provided in §§ 671-679 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Under the
terms of the Trust Agreement, the Settlor has the administrative right to reacquire trust property by
substituting property of equivalent value at any time (the "Power to Reacquire"). The provision of the Trust
Agreement creating the Settlor's Power to Reacquire reads as follows:
POWER TO REACQUIRE. Except as otherwise provided below, the Grantor, in an individual and
nonfiduciary capacity, without the approval or consent of any person in a fiduciary capacity, shall have the
power to reacquire property of the trust, other than shares of voting stock of a controlled corporation (within
EFTA01134955
the meaning of Section 2036(b) of the Code), whether owned directly or indirectly through one or more
limited liability companies, partnerships or other entities, by substituting other property of an equivalent
value; provided that the Independent Trustees are satisfied that the substituted property is of equivalent
value. If no Independent Trustee is then serving, upon the exercise of this power by the Grantor, the
Trustees shall appoint an Independent Trustee in accordance with subparagraph (C)(1) of Clause EIGHTH.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantor may not exercise his power under this paragraph in such a
manner that may shift benefits among the trust beneficiaries within the meaning of Revenue Ruling 2008-
22 and Revenue Ruling 2011-28. The Grantor may at any time and from time to time release, in whole or in
part, the powers retained by him under this Clause SEVENTH. Such release may be for a limited period or
under stated conditions or indefinitely. Such release shall be made by an instrument in writing delivered to
the Trustees
The Settlor in this case wishes to exercise the Power to Reacquire by substituting tangible personal
property he owns (the "Substituted Property") for Trust property other than tangible personal property (the
"Trust Property") having an equivalent value to the Substituted Property. He has requested guidance on
whether this substitution is considered a sale subject to New York State sales and use taxes.
Analysis
When a Senior establishes an irrevocable trust for another's benefit but retains non-fiduciary dominion and
control, pursuant to IRC §§ 671-679, the Settlor has created an intentionally defective grantor trust. This
trust is treated differently by different parts of the IRC. For the Estate tax, the property is no longer
considered to be part of the Senior's estate. However, for the Personal Income Tax, income from the trust
is considered part of the Settlor's income, because he retains non-fiduciary dominion and control over the
income produced by the trust and can enter into transactions for his own benefit. The question presented in
this case is how the trust should be treated for purposes of the sales and use tax in New York.
Section 1105(a) of the Tax Law imposes sales tax on the receipts from every retail sale of tangible personal
property, unless otherwise exempt. Section 1101(a) of the Tax Law provides that the term "person" includes
"an individual, partnership, limited liability company, society, association, joint stock company, corporation,
estate, receiver, trustee, assignee, referee, and any other person acting in a fiduciary or representative
capacity, whether appointed by a court or otherwise, and any combination of the foregoing." In addition, for
sales tax purposes, a "sale" includes "[a]ny transfer of title or possession or both, exchange or barter,
rental, lease or license to use or consume . . . conditional or otherwise, in any manner or by any means
whatsoever for a consideration, or any agreement therefor. . . ." Tax Law § 1101(b)(5); see also 20 NYCRR
§ 526.7 (a), (b).
When an individual transfers title or possession of property to a trust, a transfer has been made to a
separate entity. See TSB-A-99(22)S. This is true even in the case of a grantor trust or a revocable living
trust. Id. If there is consideration given in any form in connection with the transfer, a retail sale of tangible
personal property occurs and sales tax is imposed. Id. Even though such a transfer may be a non-event for
income tax purposes, it will still be a sale under the sales tax as long as it is made to a separate entity. See
TSB-A-06(8)S.
Petitioner contends that the terms of the trust agreement do not allow the exchange between the Settlor
and Trust to be supported by consideration. The Settlor alone, in a non-fiduciary capacity, decides whether
to exercise the Power to Reacquire and what property will be substituted. The Trustees have no power to
consent or agree to the substitution. Under these terms, the Petitioner contends there is no negotiation or
bargaining between the parties and the exchange is not supported by consideration.
However, a transfer to a trust does not require negotiation to be supported by consideration. See TSB-A-
99(22)S; see also 20 NYCRR 526.7(a)(3) (definition of sale includes involuntary transfer). As long as the
individual receives something of value in the transfer, consideration is present. Id. Because Petitioner plans
to transfer tangible personal property to the trust and receive other than tangible personal property of
EFTA01134956
equivalent value from the trust in return, this transaction is a sale for sales tax purposes and, unless some
other exemption applies, the sales tax will be imposed on the value of the property received in the
exchange.
Sales tax is imposed on retail sales of tangible personal property. See Tax Law § 1105(a). A "retail sale" is
defined, in part, as sale "for any purpose other than . . . resale as such. . . ." Tax Law § 1101(b)(4) .
Petitioner's initial purchase of the tangible personal property that is to be transferred to the trust may
qualify for the resale exclusion if Petitioner intended at the time the property was purchased to transfer it to
the trust for consideration. See Matter of . Construction v. Chu, 145 AD2d 716 (3d Dep't 1988).
However, to establish that he purchased the property for resale and thereby qualify the purchase for the
resale exclusion, Petitioner must "show that [the property] was purchased for one and only one purpose:
resale." Matter of the Petition of P-H Fine Arts, Ltd, Tax Appeals Tribunal, October 13, 1994, confirmed 227
AD2d 683 (3d Dep't 1996) (petitioner's purchase of artwork does not qualify for the resale exclusion
because petitioner displayed the artwork before reselling it). Although not determinative, later activities may
be relevant to ascertain Petitioner's intent at the time of sale. See Matter of Construction, supra.
DATED: January 29, 2014
Deborah R. Liebman
Deputy Counsel
NOTE: An Advisory Opinion is issued at the request of a person or entity. It is limited to the facts set forth
therein and is binding on the Department only with respect to the person or entity to whom it is issued and
only if the person or entity fully and accurately describes all relevant facts. An Advisory Opinion is based on
the law, regulations, and Department policies in effect as of the date the Opinion is issued or for the
specific time period at issue in the Opinion. The information provided in this document does not cover
every situation and is not intended to replace the law or change its meaning.
•
•
•
•
•
Tax Analysts (2014)
Save to My Profile
Enter your e-mail address
Name this document:
Optional Category:
Optional Notes:
Carlyn S. McCaffrey I Partner
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
EFTA01134957
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained herein (including any attachments), unless specifically stated otherwise, is not intended or written to be used, and
cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter herein.
This message is a PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL communication. This message and all attachments are a private
communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message
is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your
system. Thank you.
Please visit for more information about our Firm.
EFTA01134958
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
4ee798689db8a680c90e4c8851231caa2027236175475b5283fe32a2d9bc46be
Bates Number
EFTA01134955
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
4
Comments 0