EFTA00077370.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 507 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (507 words)
From To: "Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS)" Cc: ' Subject: Re: FOX Business inquiry Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:57:59 +0000 Of course. And agreed, especially given the way she framed the questions in "full disclosure" about former USAs (I'm assuming she actually meant AUSAs), it seems like she'll be totally receptive to that. Shouldn't be a problem. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) a wrote: And that it does NOT violate any DOJ policies. On Mar 16, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) wrote: I think you should tell them off the record that this is a unique situation because Prince Andrew opened the door to public comment by issuing a press release (unprecedented) offering to cooperate and creating a public misperception and a misperception on behalf of Epstein's victims that he was cooperating. There is an important law enforcement interest to set the record straight. What do you think? On Mar 16, 2020, at 11:17 AM, M1=1.> wrote: Geoff: just let me know if you'd like for me to do anything other than decline. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Pagones, Stephanie" < Date: March 16, 2020 at 8:22:57 AM EDT To: " Subject: FOX Business inquiry Hi, We're working on a story in which we speak to several former federal prosecutors and US Attorneys about the potential next steps in the Epstein investigation, particularly as it pertains to Prince Andrew's unwillingness to cooperate. EFTA00077370 One of the things that has come up from multiple people is how unusual it is for Geoffrey Berman to have spoken publicly about this matter, not once, but twice. Per one former US Attorney: "It's an unusual move because generally speaking, there is a rule, there's guidance in the U.S. attorneys manual that comes from the attorney general that indicates that they are not to comment." Full disclosure, in most, if not all cases, the people I spoke with said they would likely have done the same thing. That said, would you or US Atty Berman like to provide any statement or comment to be included in the story? We are on deadline for 4 p.m. Monday. Thank you in advance, I hope to hear from you before then. Stephanie Pagones Digital ReporterIFOX Business cell: @steph_pagones <image001.png> This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of Fox News or Fox Business must not be taken to have been sent or endorsed by either of them. No representation is made that this email or its attachments are without defect. EFTA00077371
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
4f75d73af5a116d72ae4fce0bb15513b987a3c26249da661a2a086989e088444
Bates Number
EFTA00077370
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!