EFTA00725494
EFTA00725496 DataSet-9
EFTA00725498

EFTA00725496.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 473 words document
P17 V16 D2 D6 P21
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (473 words)
Etc Deat Thank you for your letter of February 11, 2010. We write to update you about ongoing efforts to reach an agreement with Robert Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with him on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line by line basis and attempt to reach a non-adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transmitted to Mr. Josefsberg an Agreement for Special Master to Determine Amount of Attorneys' Fees and Costs ("Special Master Agreement"), signed by Mr. Epstein, containing terms and conditions previously agreed to by Mr. Josefsberg, which would mandate binding mediation before a neutral third party in the event the proposed settlement discussions did not resolve all outstanding issues in an expeditious manner. We want to assure you that Mr. Epstein fully intends to fulfill his obligations under the NPA. We regret that issues remain unresolved regarding whether all of the fees and costs being sought by the attorney representative - which now total $1,947,000 exclusive of the $526,466 already paid by Mr. Epstein — meet the criteria set forth by the NPA. We assure you that both Mr. Epstein's prior civil counsel, Jay Lefkowitz, who, with you, was a primary negotiator of the NPA language, and Mr. Critton each strongly believe that signficant amounts of the fees billed by Mr. Josefsberg are outside the scope of Mr. Epstein's fee-related payment obligations under the NPA. We hope that the fee-related issues can be resolved by further settlement discussions or by relying on the Special Master Agreement signed yesterday by Mr. Epstein. Mr. Epstein and his counsel believe that these options are consistent with the NPA, are good faith alternatives to contested litigation, and are reasonable given the unexpected magnitude of the bills and their inclusion of charges for legal work that was clearly related to the preparation of litigation as well as for EFTA00725496 extensive work performed by attorneys from outside Mr. Josefsberg's law firm and thus outside Par 7C of the Addendum. Mr. Josefsberg previously advocated for settling outstanding issues through a Special Master Agreement nearly identical to the one executed yesterday by Mr. Epstein. In fact, Mr. Josefsberg and Mr. Epstein had each agreed in the past to a specific Master as a third party neutral to conduct proceedings to resolve the fee issues however the selected Master withdrew. We hope that the Special Master Agreement will provide a basis for a prompt resolution of any issue not resolved by the parties through further discussions. YT RB MGW CC US Atty Jeffrey Sloman CC AUSA Robert Senior EFTA00725497
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
517af8f154b11be390ac92389639a7c9b1436f13ac4b80deffdc81b5e5504164
Bates Number
EFTA00725496
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!