EFTA00438021.pdf

From: Lesley Groff To: Jefffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Redacted past work product for investors Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:58:24 +0000 Attachments: Redacted_analysis_of_effect_of_prospective_court_ruling_against_EPA_on_generation_pla nt values.pdf; RtTdacted_analysis_of_inefficiencies_of_natural_gas_funding_by_capital_markets.pdf; Redacted_analysis of_proposal_on_geothermal_project.pdf; Redacted Greek Swiss_law_bond_memo.pdf; Redacted_natural_gas_VPP memo.pdf; Redacted_proposalfor_European_corporate_debt_exchange.pdf Begin forwarded message: From: John Dizard < Subject: Fwd: Redacted past work product for Investors Date: October 26, 2016 at 5:50:45 PM EDT To: Lesley Groff < Dear Jeffrey, I have looked for examples of my non-journalistic consulting work that could be sensibly and discreetly redacted, and which showed the difference between the level of detail of my work for private investors and my journalistic efforts. There is a review of a geothermal project I turned down, an overview of how the US natural gas market bubble was inflated, the effect on energy investors of a then-prospective court setback for the EPA, and a discussion of natural gas Volumetric Production Payments. The passage of time should allow some measure of how well my views anticipated future events This is energy weighted, but it should give you some idea of what I was proposing Best and thanks! John EFTA00438021