📄 Extracted Text (358 words)
The
Economist
October 20, 2012
China's consumer-led growth
Contributions to growth, %
100 -
80
60
40
20
-20
0
1,
O
(§)'.
Inhhal LII
moo/ mooDmoo
,
C Cr C5$ Cf) .S9Doti
%).
a'
■ N
• Consumption
Investment
• Net exports
-40 es
-60
• Consumption includes government consumption as well as household consumption.
" These calculations refer not to consumption's share of GOP (C/GDP), but to its share of GDP growth (AC / AGDP).
Consumption is still unusually low (and investment unusually high) as a share of China's GDP. But as long as consumption's
contribution to growth exceeds its share of GDP, that share will rise.
CHINA, you may have heard, announced its latest growth figures on Thursday. The speed of growth
attracted most of the attention, but the source of growth is perhaps more striking. At a press conference
(in Chinese; see an FT report here), the National Bureau of Statistics pointed out that in the first three
quarters of this year consumption* contributed over half (55%) of China's growth, exceeding the
contribution from investment. If that pattern holds, China's growth this year will not be investment-led
(let alone export-led), but consumption-led.**
That hasn't happened for over a decade. Or so I thought. Until recently, the official statistics showed
that investment made the biggest contribution to China's growth in every year since 2001. But earlier
this week the new edition of the China Statistical Yearbook arrived on my desk with a thud. Its revised
Page I 1of 2
EFTA01092145
figures show that consumption contributed 55.5% of China's growth in 2011; investment contributed
only 48.8%. (Net exports subtracted 4.3%.) In other words, China's growth was consumption-led last
year as well.
So far, this revision seems to have passed largely unnoticed by China-watchers. (Andy Rothman of CLSA
is one notable exception. See also the FT's Lex column.) People are accustomed to the idea that
investment is the principal engine of China's extraordinary expansion. That notion is one of the most
familiar "stylised facts" about its economy. But this revision of the figures suggests a restyling of the
facts is now due.
Page 12 of 2
EFTA01092146
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5359f960e94440c0a5f1e207b858417181e55221673701fef901535f2be22454
Bates Number
EFTA01092145
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0