EFTA00991865.pdf

From: Eileen Alexanderson To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Question Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:25:34 +0000 Historically, the house couple that works for Leon and Debra at 760 Park Ave have lived in the coop apt on 72nd St that Leon's Mom owned. That apartment is coming to Leon as part of her estate but the couple can no longer live there due to coop rules and apt will soon be listed for sale. Debra, working with a RE friend, has found another apt which is a condo to rent for the couple. Apt will be paid for by Leon and Debra. Question for you as I proceed to get a lease signed: I do not want lease in the couple's name b/c they will not make income check needed w/o guaranty and if they don't work out we will need the apt for their replacement. should we form a new LLC for this purpose? So far sounds like apt owner is ok with an LLC as party on lease and will take 2 or 3 months security rather than require a guaranty. Separately we spoke about an LLC for the cars. Could potentially use the LLC for both? Our existing LLCs that own property are pretty much all Trust owned. Leon's art are related. We formed a new LLC for the townhouse purchase(owned by the APO Trust). We could consider using that LLC since the couple are caretakers for that property but Leon and Debra are supposed to fund normal operating expenses while they live in the house so I would think we would put the lease in the name of that LLC and the fund monthly rent from house account. Need to decide this morn so we do not lose this apt. Please advise. Thanks. Sent from my iPhone EFTA00991865