📄 Extracted Text (361 words)
PT/BC/
13 March 2011
Telegraph Media Group Ltd.,
ill Buckingham Palace Road,
London SW1W ODT.
FAO: The Editor, The Daily Telegraph
cc Arthur W nn Davies, Leal Mana er -
Dear Sirs,
We have been consulted by Jeffrey Epstein in relation to your grossly inaccurate and
persistent references to him being a "paedophile", in particular in your editions of 7th and 10th
March under the headlines "Duchess of York admits Duke arranged for convicted
paedophile Jeffrey Epstein to pay off her debts" and "The Duke, his paedophile guest,
and the most unusual use of an RAF base" respectively, and on your website.
Our client is not, as your headline article alleges, a convicted paedophile. Although he has
been convicted of soliciting prostitutes, and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, he
has served his time for that offence. As a matter of record, but without seeking to justify the
offence, the girls in question were not pre-pubescent.
Furthermore, the false and distorted terminology used by you to describe our client in your
vitriolic attack on his character is simply not true on any interpretation of the word
"paedophile". He has not been convicted nor been accused of being a paedophile (a
pejorative that has a very specific medical definition), apart from by certain elements of the
tabloid press in their recent reports on his friendship with Prince Andrew. Our client
however should be entitled to expect more accurate and credible reporting from a respected
broadsheet such as the Daily Telegraph, which is supposed to have significantly higher
standards than the sensationalised and exaggerated reporting of the tabloids.
Our client is entitled, at the very least, to the publication of a categoric clarification and
apology, in terms to be first agreed with us, as a matter of some urgency. We would
therefore be grateful to receive your proposals in this regard, while our client continues to
reserve all his rights in relation to, in particular, what would be a totally justified Complaint
to the PCC, together with appropriate redress in relation to your defamatory allegations and
malicious falsehoods.
We look forward to hearing from you by return.
Yours faithfully,
JOHNSONS
EFTA01110827
EFTA01110828
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
549a6654c6da9da89a1607ad3249263d3c806d313791a6a766dd2bc132f68368
Bates Number
EFTA01110827
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0