📄 Extracted Text (457 words)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2,
Plaintiffs,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
/
NOTICE OF OBJECTION
Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 have moved for disclosure of settlement letters
between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epsicin during a federal
criminal investigation. [DE 50 at 51. Doe 1 and Doe 2 seek to use these letters as evidence in this
civil matter, and request the Court's permission to disseminate the letters to the international media
[DE 511. Even though the letters are sealed and subject to a protective order issued by the Magistrate
Judge in the related case 9:08-CV-80893, at least one of these letters was leaked last week to The
Daily Beast, an online "omnivorous guide" to gossip and news that boasts 51 million web page
views.'
Some ofthe lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein during the federal criminal investigation
and whose work product was included in the settlement letters, object to the release and
dissemination the settlement letters. These lawyers will be filing a motion to intervene and a
memorandum of law within the 14-day period provided by the Rules to respond to DE 50 and DE
The Daily Beast, www.thedailybeast.conilblogs-and-stories/2011-03-25/jeffrey-
epstein-how-the-billionaire-pedophile-got-offeasy/2/, last visited March 27, 2011.
EFTA00212527
51, which Doe 1 and Doe 2 filed on March 21, 2011.
Members of the defense team will be objecting and seeking a protective order on the grounds
that the letters fall under the protections ofopinion work-product ofthe lawyers, as well as the broad
protections of Federal Rules of Evidence 410 and 408, Federal Rule ofCriminal Procedure 11, and
the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.
The lawyers will also object to dissemination of these letters because they contain
information from the grand jury's investigation, and this information is confidential pursuant to
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e).
In an abundance of caution, defense team members two of
the attorneys who represented Jeffrey Epstein during the investigation, are filing this pleading to
provide notice to the Court and the parties of the intention to object to the disclosures sought by Doe
1 and Doe 2. A motion to intervene for this purpose, and a memorandum of law, will be filed no
later than April 4, 2011.
Attorney a member in good standing of the Massachusetts Bar, will be
filing a motion for permission to appear pro hac vice in these proceedings.
We certify that on March 28, 2011, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.
2
EFTA00212528
We also certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent via separate email to all counsel
of record.
Respectfully submitted,
3
EFTA00212529
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5583b33e105b7246f4416cd1248d52a1a26f5625325b85c725c87e3450333d8f
Bates Number
EFTA00212527
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0