👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,493 words)
From: Deepak Chopra
To: jeffrey E. .<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: thought
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:37:57 +0000
In yoga class
This is a useful theme for future discussions
b•A
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book: Radicalbcauty.com
On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:33 AM, jeffrey E. leevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
i really like the concept of usefule construct vs uselss. consruct go going?
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Deepak Chopra wrote:
see below
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Chopra Foundation
Jiyo
Chopra Center for Wellbeing
<0utlookEmoji-1473730260309_9781101906026_p0_v4_s192x300.jpg.jpg>
EFTA00815241
For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com
From: Deepak Chopra
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM
To: Rudolph Tanzi
Cc:
Subject: Re: thought
DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are human constructs --the entire universe
including what we call "God" -is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced as
observer and observed -classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts-
products of language--linguistic, mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Chopra Foundation
Jiyo
Chopra Center for Wellbeing
<OutlookEmoji-1473730260309_9781101906026_p0_v4_s192x300.jpg.jpg>
For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com
From: Rudolph Tanzi
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM
To: Deepak Chopra
Cc:
Subject: Re: thought
EFTA00815242
Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with similar DNA agree most on the construct.
The universe of a bacterium in a dish is much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while
the bacterium's is closer to a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception
of each species.
On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra < wrote:
I cannot in all honesty
I believe that the universe we experience is totally a human construct
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book: Radicalbeauty.com
On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM, c > wrote:
From: "Sperry Andrews"
"Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne" What makes mutual
understanding "perfect" ? I find, the challenge here on this list, and in life, appears
precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always stable, get easily frightened.
When we are, consciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience -
which reliably allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract concepts
with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we seem to agree. Yes, but (1) you
describe an ideal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the whole
group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings.
Their makes it harder but also better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles -
as if caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings for each of us - often
times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently via mutual
understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to
see us aspire to paradigm change. In the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully
EFTA00815243
embodied way - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn from suffering - to un-
learn these habits. I can see practice achieving that with basic criteria met first.
Sperry, you are an able mediator. Love Suzanne
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM > wrote:
Deepak, Sperry,
This is PERFECT.
Love,
Suzanne
----Original Message
From: Sperry Andrews <
To: Dee ak Cho ra
Cc >: terribillionairs < >;
carlo.monsanto < BVR1001
0
>: subhashkak
alvin.swimmer Ienrein >: kajobst
s.lakshmanan
menas
w .eing
Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: thought
With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our mortal forms more closely approximating what is
constant.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra wrote:
I find it existentially exhilarating
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
New Book: Radicalbeauty.com
EFTA00815244
On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM, wrote:
Hugs, Sperry,
With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the rest of what you say here. I find
it existentially despairing.
Love,
Suzanne
---Original Message----
From: Seer Andrews
To:
Cc: Chopra Foundation >; terribillionairs >; Carlo
Monsanto < >; daniel ELIZABETH A.
FtAUSCHER < Haramein ; Jim Beichler
Karla Galdamez < ; Ru ; Subhash Kak
; alvin.swimmer ; dyson ; Glen
Rein ; kajobst , mukhoak191 11MIS
; s.lakshmanan ; s.lakshmanan
Menas Kafatos >; Millard Wohl
Sent Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm
Subject: Re: thought
contemplating math symbolically,
when we divide 1 by an infinitely large number
we most closely approximate O.
1/infinity = O,
This " I " experiences being a singular unity that is continuously being divided by infinite variations on a
theme,
re-creating what" I "AM BEing as an awakeness that is receiving and reflecting
some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body going nowhere,
unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless consciousness.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sperry Andrews < wrote:
That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing an essential, indispensable, 'eternal' constant to
all forms.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM > wrote:
Hugs, Sperry,
Hooray! You acknowledge there is form.
Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with form enough.
EFTA00815245
The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for indivisibility but even points
are divisible.
Immortal is a theological concept which I believe applies (like eternal) only in
the sense that atoms recycle.
Love,
Suzanne
----Original Message----
From: Sperry Andrews
To: Deepak Chopra <
Cc: >; terribillionairs >:
carl BVR1001
>. subhashkak
alvin.swimmer < dyson <IMPS
glenrein >; kajobst ; mukhoak1953
s.lakshmanan
s.lakshmanan ; menas >; wllbeing
Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm
Subject: Re: thought
This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " Does any of 'this' make sense to any of 'you' ?
Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes transient life possible.
The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can be experienced by
humanity as whole.
Without formlessness form would not transform in space over time. Without form formlessness would
be nothing at all.
These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuate their characteristics. Formlessness uniting
all as one,
while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like formlessness--indivisible, immortal, all knowing
consciousness.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Deepak Chopra < > wrote:
"I " is not a person
The is no such thing as a person .
You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/ woman
"I " is the awareness in which the so called person arises and subsides as an intermittent stream of
sensations images feelings and thoughts . These in turn arise in " I " are known in " I " and are made
out of " I " ." I " is infinite being ( formless' ) having a finite experience as form . The form is an illusion
as it is phenomena - an activity of the formless . All forms are phenomena . All phenomena arise and
subside in every moment of now .The formless is the only reality . It is timeless being . You cannot
hold on to a time bound phenomenon . It is not a "thing " . Even the " you " that you call " I " is a time
bound phenomenon .
Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being = Yoga
Deepak Chopra
2013 Costa Del Mar Road
Carlsbad, CA 92013
EFTA00815246
New Book: Radicalbeauty.com
On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:33 AM, wrote:
Hugs, Deepak:
A thought about I Am The Universe:
There are millions of people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for
example, Greg Braden's books about cyclical universes. If they feel,
accurately, that the universe is on an irreversibly downward spiral, I don't
think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title
claims.
Can you find some way to say what you must while adding to it?
Much love,
Suzanne
Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi
Joseph. P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School
Vice-Chair, Neurology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit
Massachusetts General Hospital
114 16th Street
Charlestown MA, 02129
httpi nghmind.or /faculty anti
http://dms.hms.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php
EFTA00815247
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00815248
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
55b7fbaa51d36926aef21088dc5da433b12b26a4b84c533dcbe422bb976224ef
Bates Number
EFTA00815241
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
8
💬 Comments 0