EFTA00815241.pdf

DataSet-9 8 pages 1,493 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,493 words)
From: Deepak Chopra To: jeffrey E. .<[email protected]> Subject: Re: thought Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 11:37:57 +0000 In yoga class This is a useful theme for future discussions b•A Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: Radicalbcauty.com On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:33 AM, jeffrey E. leevacation®gmail.com> wrote: i really like the concept of usefule construct vs uselss. consruct go going? On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Deepak Chopra wrote: see below 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation Jiyo Chopra Center for Wellbeing <0utlookEmoji-1473730260309_9781101906026_p0_v4_s192x300.jpg.jpg> EFTA00815241 For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:52 AM To: Rudolph Tanzi Cc: Subject: Re: thought DNA , bacteria, brain --anything humans have given names to are human constructs --the entire universe including what we call "God" -is human construct. Reality is awareness and its excitations experienced as observer and observed -classification and description into form and phenomena are human constucts- products of language--linguistic, mathematical, scientific --useful but not fundamental 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 Chopra Foundation Jiyo Chopra Center for Wellbeing <OutlookEmoji-1473730260309_9781101906026_p0_v4_s192x300.jpg.jpg> For more information visit: RadicalBeauty.com From: Rudolph Tanzi Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:50:29 PM To: Deepak Chopra Cc: Subject: Re: thought EFTA00815242 Every universe of every being is their own construct. Those with similar DNA agree most on the construct. The universe of a bacterium in a dish is much difference than ours, which is close to that of our dog while the bacterium's is closer to a yeast. These are all valid universes changing with the DNA-encoded perception of each species. On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Deepak Chopra < wrote: I cannot in all honesty I believe that the universe we experience is totally a human construct Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: Radicalbeauty.com On Oct 11, 2016, at 8:38 PM, c > wrote: From: "Sperry Andrews" "Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne" What makes mutual understanding "perfect" ? I find, the challenge here on this list, and in life, appears precarious at times. Well, yes. Humans are not always stable, get easily frightened. When we are, consciously aware of our non-verbal sensory/emotional experience - which reliably allows our verbal-analytic minds to integrate their abstract concepts with what is intimately being sensed and felt - we seem to agree. Yes, but (1) you describe an ideal ego-free state. (2) It seem to be this is not yet 1 goal for the whole group so we don't benefit from task unification as we did before the list mergings. Their makes it harder but also better. Otherwise, we go round and around in circles - as if caught up in a dictionary of terms with different meanings for each of us - often times becoming strident about what we wish to share more intelligently via mutual understanding. (3) That's the different, opposing agendas. I for one would love to see us aspire to paradigm change. In the absence of sharing non-verbally - in a fully EFTA00815243 embodied way - as one single Self/Self aware consciousness, we learn from suffering - to un- learn these habits. I can see practice achieving that with basic criteria met first. Sperry, you are an able mediator. Love Suzanne On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM > wrote: Deepak, Sperry, This is PERFECT. Love, Suzanne ----Original Message From: Sperry Andrews < To: Dee ak Cho ra Cc >: terribillionairs < >; carlo.monsanto < BVR1001 0 >: subhashkak alvin.swimmer Ienrein >: kajobst s.lakshmanan menas w .eing Sent: Thu, Oct 6, 2016 6:32 pm Subject: Re: thought With every new instant of perceptual activity, I feel our mortal forms more closely approximating what is constant. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Deepak Chopra wrote: I find it existentially exhilarating Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 New Book: Radicalbeauty.com EFTA00815244 On Oct 6, 2016, at 5:36 PM, wrote: Hugs, Sperry, With your 1st 5 lines. I have problems with the rest of what you say here. I find it existentially despairing. Love, Suzanne ---Original Message---- From: Seer Andrews To: Cc: Chopra Foundation >; terribillionairs >; Carlo Monsanto < >; daniel ELIZABETH A. FtAUSCHER < Haramein ; Jim Beichler Karla Galdamez < ; Ru ; Subhash Kak ; alvin.swimmer ; dyson ; Glen Rein ; kajobst , mukhoak191 11MIS ; s.lakshmanan ; s.lakshmanan Menas Kafatos >; Millard Wohl Sent Thu, Oct 6, 2016 2:36 pm Subject: Re: thought contemplating math symbolically, when we divide 1 by an infinitely large number we most closely approximate O. 1/infinity = O, This " I " experiences being a singular unity that is continuously being divided by infinite variations on a theme, re-creating what" I "AM BEing as an awakeness that is receiving and reflecting some sense of all that ever was, is and will be, as no body going nowhere, unborn, deathless, immeasurable, indivisible, timeless consciousness. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Sperry Andrews < wrote: That which is 'not a thing' cannot be divided--contributing an essential, indispensable, 'eternal' constant to all forms. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:05 AM > wrote: Hugs, Sperry, Hooray! You acknowledge there is form. Your last sentence, however, for me, does not deal with form enough. EFTA00815245 The point unfolded to make the ultimate case for indivisibility but even points are divisible. Immortal is a theological concept which I believe applies (like eternal) only in the sense that atoms recycle. Love, Suzanne ----Original Message---- From: Sperry Andrews To: Deepak Chopra < Cc: >; terribillionairs >: carl BVR1001 >. subhashkak alvin.swimmer < dyson <IMPS glenrein >; kajobst ; mukhoak1953 s.lakshmanan s.lakshmanan ; menas >; wllbeing Sent: Wed, Oct 5, 2016 2:06 pm Subject: Re: thought This - below - appears to be so to this " I. " Does any of 'this' make sense to any of 'you' ? Without both hydrogen and oxygen there would be no water--which makes transient life possible. The zen chant we all know, form is formlessness, formlessness is form, can be experienced by humanity as whole. Without formlessness form would not transform in space over time. Without form formlessness would be nothing at all. These two ingredients constantly mixing together, perpetuate their characteristics. Formlessness uniting all as one, while forms attempt to perfect their capacity to be like formlessness--indivisible, immortal, all knowing consciousness. On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Deepak Chopra < > wrote: "I " is not a person The is no such thing as a person . You are never the same person as a child infant teen ager older man/ woman "I " is the awareness in which the so called person arises and subsides as an intermittent stream of sensations images feelings and thoughts . These in turn arise in " I " are known in " I " and are made out of " I " ." I " is infinite being ( formless' ) having a finite experience as form . The form is an illusion as it is phenomena - an activity of the formless . All forms are phenomena . All phenomena arise and subside in every moment of now .The formless is the only reality . It is timeless being . You cannot hold on to a time bound phenomenon . It is not a "thing " . Even the " you " that you call " I " is a time bound phenomenon . Nothing to hold on to and no one doing the holding on = Freedom in Being = Yoga Deepak Chopra 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92013 EFTA00815246 New Book: Radicalbeauty.com On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:33 AM, wrote: Hugs, Deepak: A thought about I Am The Universe: There are millions of people, IN THE MAINSTREAM, who buy, for example, Greg Braden's books about cyclical universes. If they feel, accurately, that the universe is on an irreversibly downward spiral, I don't think they'll be calmed or comforted by a concept claiming what your title claims. Can you find some way to say what you must while adding to it? Much love, Suzanne Dr. Rudolph E. Tanzi Joseph. P. and Rose F. Kennedy Professor of Neurology Harvard Medical School Vice-Chair, Neurology; Director, Genetics and Aging Research Unit Massachusetts General Hospital 114 16th Street Charlestown MA, 02129 httpi nghmind.or /faculty anti http://dms.hms.harvard.edu/neuroscience/fac/tanzi.php EFTA00815247 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00815248
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
55b7fbaa51d36926aef21088dc5da433b12b26a4b84c533dcbe422bb976224ef
Bates Number
EFTA00815241
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
8

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!