EFTA00066941.pdf

DataSet-9 3 pages 554 words document
D6 D5
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (554 words)
From: Aida Leisenring < To: Michael Bachrach < Cc: Bruce Barket < Subject: RE: US v. Tartaglione Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 21:39:24 +0000 Hello Jason and Maurene, We second the request for a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office to provide defense counsel in this case with the MCC legal visit logs that you now have in your possession. In the interest of making a complete record of this death-authorized case, we are also requesting a copy from the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Inmate Count logs you also indicated that you have in your possession. Thank you and have a good weekend. Best, Aida Ferrer Leisenring, Esq. Barket, Epstein, Kearon, Aldea & LoTurco LLP Please note that my emailed has changed to: This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Michael Bachrach < Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 10:20 AM To: cza Cc: Bruce Barket <[email protected]>; Aida Leisenring john diaz < ); Subject: Re: US v. Tartaglione Jason and Maurene, EFTA00066941 Following up on our conference call from yesterday, please ask the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office or firewall counsel assigned to this case (Margery Feinzig and Ilan Graff) to provide defense counsel in this case with the MCC attorney/legal visitation logs that you now have in your possession, specifically the attorney/legal visitation logs relating to visits of Nicholas Tartaglione (#78514-054). We appreciate your agreement not to review these records for substance and to handle them through firewall or other similar counsel. Also, just to clarify, in preparation for your Office's response to the NY Times FOIA request, did you obtain additional BOP records (besides Tartaglione's visitation logs) that relate to the penalty phase of our case, which we haven't previously reviewed or received? If so, please provide that additional information to us as well. Thank you for your assistance. --Michael Michael K. Bachrach, Es M EST, < wrote: Yes, that works for us. Let's use this dial-in: 844-215-6902 605267 From: Michael Bachrach Sent: Tuesda Januar 5. 2021 9:36 AM To: Aida Leisenring john diaz Cc: Subject: Re: US v. Tartaglione Hi Jason. EFTA00066942 Happy New Year to you as well. How's Thursday at 1:30 pm for the call? Both retained and appointed counsel are available at that date and time. --Michael Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:24 PM, All, Happy New Year and hope everyone is staying healthy. We would like to discuss an issue with you related to the Protective Order previously entered in this case regarding BOP documents (Dkt No. 119). Would you please huddle up and let us know some dates/times this week where at least one member of the retained team and one member of learned counsel are available for a call. Thanks, Deputy Chief, White Plains Division United States Attorneys Office Southern District of New York EFTA00066943
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5690e1c584502dea00cd2e99cb38482e6a175ea438bea966333146a89bd2d04d
Bates Number
EFTA00066941
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!