podesta-emails

podesta_email_11520.txt

podesta-emails 2,012 words email
P19 P17 V16 V11 V12
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- If we have to have it, think that is a better formulation. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 7, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Nick Merrill <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree it doesn¹t read as well as it would sound, but I understand why > it¹s there. Or at least in my mind it puts the email in perspective among > the numerous other ways she more regularly communicated. > I sent PIR this formulation, feel free to love it or trash it: > > I am a bit bemused to be caught up in a controversy about email, as I see > myself as being a late-coming to the wonders of modern technology, and > someone who spent most of my time at State on > the phone or having in-person meetings. But since my time in the Senate I > have also been an emailer, and while that¹s not where the business of > diplomacy is primarily conducted, I used it as an efficient way to > communicate with my staff while Secretary. > > > > On 3/7/15, 3:14 PM, "Jennifer Palmier I" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Agree with Jim and Mandy on it having the "bemused" paragraph in the >> statement - better said by her at some point. >> >> Regarding Katherine's point on previous Secretaries, since email is >> relatively new and not used prior to WJC's administration, I think it is >> fine that we only have Powell and Rice to fall back on - and think it is >> important part of our justification. So would encourage that we keep it >> in. >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Mar 7, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Turner, Katherine <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Please see the attached redline with proposed edits. A few notes: >>> >>> >>> 1. On Jennifer¹s factual question, I believe there are at least a >>> few e-mails in the set sent to State that are between the Clinton email >>> and a senior Staff¹s person e-mail, so I have proposed an edit that ³it >>> was her practice to email² to state.gov accounts. >>> >>> 2. The changes in paragraph six have been made to reflect the >>> timing ­ the letter request from State was dated October 28 and received >>> October 30. Also, I propose deleting the reference to the time lapse >>> between the end of her tenure and when the docs were sent over ­ I don¹t >>> think it helps to emphasize the length of time. >>> >>> 3. I have suggested deleting the clause ³like many of my >>> predecessors² ­ I¹m not sure we have confirmation as to any others >>> besides Powell, and Rice recently stated that she did not use a personal >>> email. >>> >>> 4. Other edits are for consistency/accuracy. >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Philippe Reines [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 2:48 PM >>> To: Heather Samuelson; Cheryl Mills; [email protected]; Robby Mook; >>> Jennifer Palmier I; Kristina Schake; Nick Merrill; Huma Abedin; >>> [email protected] >>> Cc: Turner, Katherine >>> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT - Last Call >>> >>> Thank you to those who have provided edits. In an effort to finalize >>> this in time for it to be useful, consider this a last call. If anyone >>> is mid-editing please email me individually so I know to hold for you. >>> Otherwise the revised will be sent to HRC shortly after 3pm. >>> >>> >>> From: Heather Samuelson >>> Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2015 1:42 PM >>> To: Cheryl Mills; [email protected]; Robby Mook; Jennifer Palmier >>> I; Kristina Schake; Nick Merrill; Huma Abedin; [email protected] >>> Cc: Philippe Reines; Turner, Katherine >>> Subject: DRAFT STATEMENT >>> >>> >>> All: >>> >>> Per our call today, attached is the DRAFT statement. >>> >>> As a reminder, this is a DRAFT and should not be circulated. >>> >>> Please note that Katherine Turner from David Kendall¹s office is copied >>> on here, and she and/or David should be copied on all future >>> communications. >>> >>> Let us know your thoughts. >>> >>> Best. >>> Heather >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> NOTICE: >>> >>> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity >>> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, >>> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >>> reader >>> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you >>> are >>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> communication >>> in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone >>> (call us collect at (202) 434-5000) and immediately delete this message >>> and all its attachments. >>> >>> >>> <2015-03-07 Draft statement - updated for review - KMT edits.docx> > > <default.xml> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.25.24.71 with SMTP id o68csp536717lfi; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 12:30:49 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.55.41.80 with SMTP id p77mr10017251qkh.67.1425760248885; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:30:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 199si13211898qht.110.2015.03.07.12.30.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:30:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id z107so19960903qgd.3; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:30:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=EyCaw1hptay2FykAWMuJ0gjr/pmYB4To5xwK4TANa68=; b=K8UCxbISrmJB6k4Uw2C/m6Ui8Pl/psrdrndnwn5w2xdYYRXOnNw+cwA3iew/uZjovU aG0Ib+8jw0Fgmx9EhUm5unQ+1xlBRYrDTFLzAV1jYWKcm9esJIEqfXzjbp/JNDt6AWcB BzXdNbLKKBGVrwQoqmTYWz/hc7KqG3w1BFchM0c31U8DVc79A5vMuCQlPTwW9dYnb/rJ HplU7M0y929uhG+VsOX+P/ZKGtDb3Df2u7wOiEzH9R8WXwnAVNCrX7N6n2EjXorLGw+c uoN/qji+uRf7XvIvOMzbdk25wp0O+yAlpGDDGm6Waf4O7WqktjFGwUy3F4rkxUv2oOco z3UA== X-Received: by 10.55.26.104 with SMTP id a101mr19070094qka.81.1425760248196; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:30:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from [10.20.80.179] (mobile-166-171-057-215.mycingular.net. [166.171.57.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b18sm4743398qkh.36.2015.03.07.12.30.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:30:47 -0800 (PST) References: <BLUPR0701MB8036C895EAA097C0043ABDCA31D0@BLUPR0701MB803.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BLUPR0701MB803BCF634F964B36A9707A5A31D0@BLUPR0701MB803.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D120C6EF.F1707%[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <D120C6EF.F1707%[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <[email protected]> CC: "Turner, Katherine" <[email protected]>, Philippe Reines <[email protected]>, Heather Samuelson <[email protected]>, Cheryl Mills <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Robby Mook <[email protected]>, Kristina Schake <[email protected]>, Huma Abedin <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D201) From: Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT - Last Call Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:30:45 -0500 To: Nick Merrill <[email protected]> If we have to have it, think that is a better formulation. Sent from my iPad > On Mar 7, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Nick Merrill <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > I agree it doesn=C2=B9t read as well as it would sound, but I understand w= hy > it=C2=B9s there. Or at least in my mind it puts the email in perspective a= mong > the numerous other ways she more regularly communicated. > I sent PIR this formulation, feel free to love it or trash it: >=20 > I am a bit bemused to be caught up in a controversy about email, as I see > myself as being a late-coming to the wonders of modern technology, and > someone who spent most of my time at State on > the phone or having in-person meetings. But since my time in the Senate I= > have also been an emailer, and while that=C2=B9s not where the business of= > diplomacy is primarily conducted, I used it as an efficient way to > communicate with my staff while Secretary. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 3/7/15, 3:14 PM, "Jennifer Palmier I" <[email protected]> > wrote: >=20 >> Agree with Jim and Mandy on it having the "bemused" paragraph in the >> statement - better said by her at some point. >>=20 >> Regarding Katherine's point on previous Secretaries, since email is >> relatively new and not used prior to WJC's administration, I think it is >> fine that we only have Powell and Rice to fall back on - and think it is >> important part of our justification. So would encourage that we keep it >> in.=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>> On Mar 7, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Turner, Katherine <[email protected]> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Please see the attached redline with proposed edits. A few notes: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> 1. On Jennifer=C2=B9s factual question, I believe there are at leas= t a >>> few e-mails in the set sent to State that are between the Clinton email >>> and a senior Staff=C2=B9s person e-mail, so I have proposed an edit that= =C2=B3it >>> was her practice to email=C2=B2 to state.gov accounts. >>>=20 >>> 2. The changes in paragraph six have been made to reflect the >>> timing =C2=AD the letter request from State was dated October 28 and rec= eived >>> October 30. Also, I propose deleting the reference to the time lapse >>> between the end of her tenure and when the docs were sent over =C2=AD I d= on=C2=B9t >>> think it helps to emphasize the length of time. >>>=20 >>> 3. I have suggested deleting the clause =C2=B3like many of my >>> predecessors=C2=B2 =C2=AD I=C2=B9m not sure we have confirmation as to a= ny others >>> besides Powell, and Rice recently stated that she did not use a personal= >>> email. >>>=20 >>> 4. Other edits are for consistency/accuracy. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Thanks. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Philippe Reines [[email protected]] >>> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 2:48 PM >>> To: Heather Samuelson; Cheryl Mills; [email protected]; Robby Mook; >>> Jennifer Palmier I; Kristina Schake; Nick Merrill; Huma Abedin; >>> [email protected] >>> Cc: Turner, Katherine >>> Subject: Re: DRAFT STATEMENT - Last Call >>>=20 >>> Thank you to those who have provided edits. In an effort to finalize >>> this in time for it to be useful, consider this a last call. If anyone >>> is mid-editing please email me individually so I know to hold for you. >>> Otherwise the revised will be sent to HRC shortly after 3pm. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> From: Heather Samuelson >>> Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2015 1:42 PM >>> To: Cheryl Mills; [email protected]; Robby Mook; Jennifer Palmier >>> I; Kristina Schake; Nick Merrill; Huma Abedin; [email protected] >>> Cc: Philippe Reines; Turner, Katherine >>> Subject: DRAFT STATEMENT >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> All: >>>=20 >>> Per our call today, attached is the DRAFT statement. >>>=20 >>> As a reminder, this is a DRAFT and should not be circulated. >>>=20 >>> Please note that Katherine Turner from David Kendall=C2=B9s office is co= pied >>> on here, and she and/or David should be copied on all future >>> communications. >>>=20 >>> Let us know your thoughts. >>>=20 >>> Best. >>> Heather >>>=20 >>> ________________________________ >>>=20 >>> NOTICE: >>>=20 >>> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity >>> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,= >>> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >>> reader >>> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you >>> are >>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> communication >>> in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone >>> (call us collect at (202) 434-5000) and immediately delete this message >>> and all its attachments. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> <2015-03-07 Draft statement - updated for review - KMT edits.docx> >=20 > <default.xml>
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
57c404d3fc9ba414150753547450adac99c9ef632eefa6253e2ef84de1026388
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!