📄 Extracted Text (513 words)
08/23/2011 18:38 FAX 5618845818 SEARCY DENNEY gho01/003
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXM BAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRIdLDLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L4., individually,
Defendant(s).
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant/Counter-plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court to
dismiss the Second Amended Complaint against him for failure to state a cause of action and in
support thereof would show:
1. the "Introduction" to the Second Amended Complaint is nothing more than
coriclusory surplusage apparently intended to defame Mr. Edwards under the protection of the
litigation privilege;
2. Except for the filing of a federal complaint that did not name Epstein and was
appiiarently never served on him,* the Amended Complaint fails to identify the "process" alleged
to be abusive, on whom it is claimed to have been sewed, or when it is claimed to have been
ser*ed;
13 ragraph 30(b) of the Second Amended Complaint references a federal civil action with which
*I
"Sowards was never served." Presumably, since the complaint is alleged to have been filed by
Edwards, the allegation was meant to have referenced Epstein rather than Edwards.
EFTA01112626
08/23/2011 16:38 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY 002/003
Edwards adv. Epstein
Edwards' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint
Case No.: 502009CA040800X.XXXMBAG
3. the Amended Complaint fails to articulate a cognizable theory of damages
prolicimately caused by any wrongdoing on the part of Bradley J. Edwards;
4. the Amended Complaint fails to identify any conduct outside the protection of the
litigation privilege which could give rise to any liability on the part of Bradley J. Edwards;
5. all legal arguments and authorities as contained in the Defendant's previously
I
filed Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages are
incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREFORE, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, demands dismissal of the Second Amended
Complaint against him.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by
Fax and U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, ay of August, 11.
Jack Sc
Flori o.: 169440
nney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
aim Beach Lakes Boulevard
Palm Beach, Florida 33409
one:
Fax:
Attorneys for BRADLEY J. EDWARDS
2
EFTA01112627
08/23/2011 16:38 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY 16009/009
Edvrards adv. Epstein
Edwards' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint
Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
COUNSEL LIST
Martin Weinberg, Esquire
Martin Weinberg, P.C. Marc S. Nurik, Esquire
20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik
Suftolk, MA 02116 Attorney For: Scott Rothstein
One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700
F
Pallx
°11= Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Phon
Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Fax:
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
25(1 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire
We>t Palm Beach, FL 33401 Fowler White Burnett, P.A.
Phcn Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein
Fax: 901 Phillips Point West
777 S Plagler Drive
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170
Le an, PL Pho
425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
For Lauderdale, FL 33301
Ph
Fax
3
EFTA01112628
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5828c54f46c9bbcfa0e4b23820e218616a815c5f68e475bcdc672cf58fb0a2f8
Bates Number
EFTA01112626
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0