EFTA00176599
EFTA00176603 DataSet-9
EFTA00176610

EFTA00176603.pdf

DataSet-9 7 pages 1,142 words document
P17 D6 V11 D2 V16
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,142 words)
i EFTA00176603 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N.E. 4 Street UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Miami. FL 33132 (305)9614100 • Telephone (305)5304444 - Facsimile August 3, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2n6 regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for negotiations, it is the minimum term of imprisonment that will obviate the need for federal prosecution. The Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein preferred to serve his sentence in a federal penetentiary, we would be willing to explore a federal conviction that may allow that in lieu of any state resolution. Further, as I made clear in our follow up telephone conversation after the meeting, a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never extended or meant as an offer. We also would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor girls identified during the federal investigation, not just the 12 that form the basis of an initial planned charging instrument. As you know, the ability to engage in flexible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00176604 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know our client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, United States Attorney 13)XO Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt EFTA00176605 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District ofFlorida 99 N.E. 4 Street I11T EDSTATES.WRNEY M Miami. FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 • Telephone (305) 5304444 • Facsimile August 3, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2n6 regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for negotiations, it is the minimum term of imprisonment that will obviate the need for federal prosecution. The Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein preferred to serve his sentence in a federal penetentiary, we would be willing to explore a federal conviction that may allow that in lieu of any state resolution. Further, as I made clear in our follow up telephone conversation after the meeting, a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never extended or meant as an offer. We also would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor girls identified during the federal investigation, not just the 12 that form the basis of an initial planned charging instrument. As you know, the ability to engage in flexible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00176606 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AuGun 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us know client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, United States Attorney By:\il \O Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt A. Marie Villafafia EFTA00176607 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District ofFlorida 99 N.E. 4 Street UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Miami, FL 33132 (305)961-9100 - Telephone (303) 530-6444 - Facsimile August 3, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Fowler White Burnett 1395 Brickell Ave Fl 14 Miami Florida 33131-3300 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. As we explained at our meeting on July 31, 2007, the Office believes that the federal interest will not be vindicated in the absence of a two-year term of state imprisonment for Mr. Epstein. That offer was not meant as a starting point for negotiations, it is the minimum term of imprisonment that will obviate the need for federal prosecution. The Office has never agreed that a state prison sentence is not appropriate for Mr. Epstein. Rather we simply stated that if Mr. Epstein preferred to serve his sentence in a federal penetentiary, we would be willing to explore a federal conviction that may allow that in lieu of any state resolution. Further, as I made clear in our follow up telephone conversation after the meeting, a plea to two federal misdemeanors was never extended or meant as an offer. We also would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor girls identified during the federal investigation, not just the 12 that form the basis of an initial planned charging .instrument. As you know, the ability to engage in flexible plea negotiations is dramatically changed upon the return of an indictment. Once an indictment is returned, the Office does not intend to file a Superseding Information containing a lesser charge or to dismiss the case in favor of state prosecution. EFTA00176608 LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. AUGUST 3, 2007 PAGE 2 Please let us law our client's decision by no later than August 17. I have conferred with U.S. Attorney who has asked me to communicate that the two-year term of incarceration is a non-negotiable minimum to vindicate a federal interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, United States Attorney BY\-- ( 111 \ ‘'D -- Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald B. Lefcourt A. Marie Villafaila EFTA00176609
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
58c3b8b73f3b9c89c8f5672c81948088fd513cac7adcdc3099c3b0b559bde34c
Bates Number
EFTA00176603
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
7

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!