📄 Extracted Text (229 words)
From:
To:
Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:47:55 +0000
Importance: Normal
From: Barry Krischer [mailto
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM
To: (USAFLS)
Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein
Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement
sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea.
From: Lanna Belohlavek
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM
To: Barry Krischer
Subject: FW: State v. Jeffrey Epstein
How to proceed?
From: Bryce Albu [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM
To: Lanna Belohlavek
Cc: Martin Reeder
Subject: State v. Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Belohlavek,
We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and
an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because
the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is
interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and
the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement.
Please call me at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
C. Bryce Albu
Reeder & Reeder P.A.
EFTA00215835
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
590a6c2a248f738b08c003856377517bf0bc998d6c1beecf3e0efeee14e5efe6
Bates Number
EFTA00215835
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0