podesta_email_00704.txt

podesta-emails 6,142 words email

P17 P22 D6 V11 P23

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Monday January 5, 2015 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> taught Cambodian youth the importance of promoting & protecting human rights #HRC365 <https://twitter.com/hashtag/HRC365?src=hash>http://1.usa.gov/1f24SPP <http://t.co/CjiHJjmRU3>[1/4/15, 11:00 a.m. EST <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/551770117583814657>] *Headlines:* *Washington Post: Where is the white Southern Republican Bill Clinton on race? <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/01/05/where-is-the-white-southern-republican-bill-clinton-on-race/>* "As I sat in that theater where [President Clinton's] words and images collided, it occurred to me that I could not recall a white Southern Republican of presidential prominence — of any prominence, really — speak as candidly about race, the dark days of segregation and the effect it had on his or her conscience and political consciousness.​" *Poughkeepsie Journal: Allida Black: “Highlights Clinton's accomplishments” <http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/story/opinion/2014/12/31/letters-editor/21125675/>* "Let us hear Hillary's call to 'never rest on [our] laurels. Never quit. Never stop working to make the world a better place. That's our unfinished business.'" *Huffington Post opinion: Peter D. Rosenstein: “Americans will sleep better when Hillary Rodham Clinton is in the White House” <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-d-rosenstein/americans-will-sleep-bett_b_6417236.html>* “Americans and peace loving people across the globe will all sleep better if Hillary Rodham Clinton takes the oath of office on January 20, 2017.” *Wall Street Journal: “Clintons to Attend Mario Cuomo Funeral” <http://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-christie-to-attend-mario-cuomo-wake-1420478396>* “Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are set to attend the funeral of former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo on Tuesday, according to spokesmen, while Vice President Joe Biden and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are among political dignitaries expected to join friends and family Monday at the wake.” *New York Daily News: “Bill and Hillary Clinton to attend former Gov. Mario Cuomo's funeral Tuesday” <http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/bill-hillary-clinton-attend-mario-cuomo-funeral-blog-entry-1.2066298>* “The Clintons and Cuomos have longstanding political and personal bonds.” *U.S. News & World Report: “A Resolution for the Contenders” <http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/charles-wheelan/2015/01/05/hillary-clinton-and-jeb-bush-should-run-like-theyre-not-afraid-to-lose>* “Here is my resolution for former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: Run for president, and do it like you are not afraid to lose.” *Associated Press: “A Year Before 2016, Iowa Full of Presidential Hopefuls” <http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_2016_IOWA_MOVES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>* “While Democrats and Republicans are waiting for Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jeb Bush and other major prospects to formally kick off the 2016 race in the state with the first presidential caucuses, other lesser known or more unlikely aspirants are already active in Iowa, letting everyone know they're available.” *CNN: “Why U.S. needs to stay in Afghanistan” <http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/05/opinion/bergen-keep-troops-in-afghanistan/index.html>* “An easy way for potential Democratic Party presidential candidates such as Hillary Clinton to distinguish their national security policies from Obama's would be to say that they are in favor of some kind of long-term U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and to argue that it would be needed to avoid an Iraq-style outcome there.” *Washington Free Beacon: “Chuck Todd: Hillary Clinton Is a Similar Politician to Obama, Not Like Her Husband” <http://freebeacon.com/politics/chuck-todd-hillary-clinton-is-a-similar-politician-to-obama-not-like-her-husband/>* “Meet the Press host Chuck Todd says that Hillary Clinton’s political style is close to that of President Obama and unlike that of her Husband, former president Bill Clinton.” *National Journal: “Many Iowa Democratic Leaders Want Contested Caucuses” <http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/latest-edition/many-iowa-democratic-leaders-want-contested-caucuses-20150105>* “‘Iowa Democratic leaders say they are troubled by the prospect that’ former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) ‘could win the state's 2016 presidential caucuses without a serious challenge, a view primarily rooted in a desire for a more liberal candidate or at least a robust debate about the party's policies and direction…” *Articles:* *Washington Post: Where is the white Southern Republican Bill Clinton on race? <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/01/05/where-is-the-white-southern-republican-bill-clinton-on-race/>* By Jonathan Capehart January 5, 2014 While touring the William J. Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, you are encouraged to watch a 12-minute film about the life and tenure of the 42nd president of the United States. I watched it last November while there for the 10th anniversary of the library’s opening, and I found one section on race to be particularly powerful. Clinton talked about his grandfather’s Hope, Ark., store and the role it played in his racial views throughout his campaigns and his presidency. Growing up in Arkansas in the ’50s and ’60s shaped my later political views in several ways. First of all, when I was a little boy hanging out in my grandfather’s store, I became aware of his commitment to treating everyone the same whether they had money or not and whatever their race was. I was only 10 years old when I realized not everyone shared those ideals. When the Little Rock Central High School crisis broke, every person in Arkansas had to take sides. I was home in Arkansas, in Hot Springs, listening as Martin Luther King told us of his dream that one day children of former slaves and the children of former slave owners would sit down together at the table of brotherhood. That speech remains the greatest political speech of my lifetime — the clearest clarion call to the more perfect union of America in the 21st century. After I heard it, my commitment to civil rights and equal opportunity for all Americans was deeper than it had ever been and stayed with me for a lifetime. As I sat in that theater where his words and images collided, it occurred to me that I could not recall a white Southern Republican of presidential prominence — of any prominence, really — speak as candidly about race, the dark days of segregation and the effect it had on his or her conscience and political consciousness. Perhaps it is because of a reliance on the distasteful but politically successful “Southern strategy” devised in the late 1960s. Even though then-Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman called GOP reliance on the exploitation of white fear and resentment “wrong” in 2005, the impact of that strategy still reverberates today. Many thought — and I hoped — Haley Barbour would be that person. When the highly regarded former Mississippi governor and former GOP chairman was considering a run for the 2012 presidential nomination, The Post’s Karen Tumulty reported then that Barbour was also “considering giving a major speech on” race. Given his blind spot the size of the Confederate flag when it comes to race, what Barbour might have said on the subject would have been fascinating. So potent and dangerous was the issue of race that a longtime friend of Barbour’s told Jason Zengerle in a profile for GQ magazine in 2011, “If he hasn’t figured out how you overcome it, or pretty well minimize it, in my opinion he won’t run.” Barbour opted not to run, and with that, the necessity of his speech on race disappeared. There have been opportunities for a white Southern Republican to address race from their perspective. Seven months after Barbour bowed out, then-presidential candidate and Texas Gov. Rick Perry came face-to-face with his “Niggerhead” past. Perry weathered the storm by calling the name associated with his family’s rented ranch “very offensive.” But the episode dredged up other racially problematic instances in Perry’s past. Last month’s revelation andadmission that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise spoke in 2002 to a white supremacist group founded by David Duke is yet another embarrassing episode for a party that knows it must reach out to people of color. The impending crop of 2016 Republican presidential aspirants doesn’t inspire hope that a white Southern Republican will engage in the race talk I’m looking for. For instance, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, right now considered the front-runner, is the scion of a political family that rose from rarified air in New England, not the bubbling race cauldron of the South. Now, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, who ditched his Fox News television show Saturday night to consider another White House run, has come close to what I’m looking for. This is despite his brief slide into birtherism in 2011. In his 2008 convention speech for then-nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), Huckabee said, “I grew up at a time and in a place where the civil rights movement was fought. I witnessed firsthand the shameful evil of racism. I saw how ignorance and prejudice caused people to do the unthinkable to people of color not so many years ago.” But his words have the feel of a pitying passive observer rather than someone galvanized to action as his fellow Arkansan, Clinton, was. What I’m looking for is probably impossible. The questions I asked when Barbour withdrew from the 2012 presidential race still remain. Is there a white Southern Republican willing and able to articulate the fear, frustration and anger filling the racial divide with as much nuance and eloquence as Barack Obama did in his first run for the Democratic nomination in 2008? Is there a white Southern Republican willing and able to give an honest speech on race from his or her perspective that sought to explain, heal and move the party forward? No doubt, such a speech would be filled with uncomfortable and painful memories that would scratch at the fiber of our country. And I recognize it could be the undoing of the brave person willing to deliver it. But said person would help the Republican Party and the nation take a bold step in breaking “America’s constant curse.” *Poughkeepsie Journal: Allida Black: “Highlights Clinton's accomplishments” <http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/story/opinion/2014/12/31/letters-editor/21125675/>* By Allida Black January 2, 2015, 12:12 p.m. EST No two women have played a more pivotal role in expanding human rights across the globe than Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton. I wrote about Eleanor Roosevelt's work in an opinion editorial in December. Now, I'd like to highlight Hillary Clinton's role. The world knows about Hillary's bold pronouncement in 1995 in Beijing that "women's rights are human rights, and human rights are women's rights." But there have been so many other examples. From elevating women's rights and the Office of Global Women's Issues to negotiating the release of the blind Chinese human rights activist Chen Guangcheng in the midst of our nation's most intense economic negotiations with China, Hillary has, as she wrote in Hard Choices, remained "clear eyed about the world as it is while never losing sight of the world as we want it to be." In 2011, following the death of Ugandan gay rights activist David Kato, rather than just mourn his death issue a formal rebuke, Hillary decided to take the world stage and confront the issue head on. Speaking before the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Hillary said, "Like being a woman, like being a racial, religious, tribal, or ethnic minority, being LGBT does not make you less human. And that is why gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights." Let us hear Hillary's call to "never rest on [our] laurels. Never quit. Never stop working to make the world a better place. That's our unfinished business." *Huffington Post opinion: Peter D. Rosenstein: “Americans will sleep better when Hillary Rodham Clinton is in the White House” <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-d-rosenstein/americans-will-sleep-bett_b_6417236.html>* By Peter D. Rosenstein January 5, 2015, 11:36 a.m. EST Just think about this report in an AP column by Jill Colvin in the Huffington Post. "It's after 9 p.m. on a Sunday night in late November and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is deep into a conference call, talking about nuclear weapons and Iran. One voice is advocating a hard line, arguing against allowing Iran any capability to enrich uranium. Another summarizes the status of current negotiations and argues that forcing Iran to give up enrichment entirely isn't realistic." "Late at night, away from the spotlight of the midterm elections and 2016 speculation, he's been on the phone with some of the brightest foreign policy minds in the Republican Party, getting ready to run for president." So Christie who knows nothing about the world situation is now preparing as he would for a college debate or a final exam. Definitely not a report to inspire confidence in the electorate he could lead the only superpower left in the world. But none of the other potential Republican choices would make anyone feel safer with their finger on the nuclear button. There is former Texas Governor Rick Perry, the candidate for those who thought George W. Bush was too cerebral; Jeb Bush, yes he could call his brother George for advice but remember where that go us; Rick Santorum, enough said; Marco Rubio who believes the last 50 years of sanctions against Cuba accomplished something and should be continued; Rand Paul who would call his father for advice and just turn away from the rest of the world; or Carly Fiorina making her own noise about running. This being the same Fiorina who got dumped by Hewett-Packard (HP) because she couldn't get along with her board after firing 18,000 employees. Her claim to fame was walking away with a golden parachute worth $21 million (a company saves a lot when you fire 18,000 people). She ran and lost a California Senate race to Barbara Boxer which came as no surprise since voters are pretty smart and she ran on her expert business acumen and how she could create jobs. We live in a world in which a new crisis arises every day and our President is required to respond. We are bringing to a close America's longest war but will still have 13,000 American troops in Afghanistan; ISIS is threatening to overrun Iraq and pull us back to fight there; and Putin is still flexing his muscles even though they are weaker since the price of oil plummeted to $50 a gallon. The Israeli/Palestinian situation is always on the verge of erupting into war and North Korea continues to threaten havoc. There are hotspots around the globe ready to explode at any time. Americans must ask themselves are we going to elect a President with no real foreign affairs knowledge or experience or are we going to elect the most qualified person ever to run for the office. Are we going to elect someone who is studying up for a debate or will we elect Hillary Rodham Clinton who has the world's leaders on speed-dial because she has traveled the world as Secretary of State negotiating with them and earning their respect? They know and we know what she stands for. We can be confident that as President she understands and won't back away from the challenges the United States faces. Hillary understands as the only remaining superpower we can't allow the new isolationists in our country to keep the United States from acting to protect our homeland and make this a safer world. She has defined what she means by acting when she describes her view of "Smart Power." She makes clear it is not always rushing in with troops rather using all the levers a President has at her disposal with military action being the last resort. Americans will always sleep better knowing we have a President with an in-depth understanding of the world situation and the players in it. Barack Obama brought the country out of the worst recession we have seen since the Great Depression. His administration has overseen the creation of more net jobs than the administrations' of both Bushes together and seen the unemployment rate go down from over ten percent to less than six percent. He saved the automotive industry and for the first time in decades we are seeing a rise in manufacturing jobs. But the work of rebuilding our economy is far from over and it won't be accomplished until people once again have the chance to enter the middle class and see a better future for their families and their children's children. While we are moving in that direction Hillary Rodham Clinton has a record that shows she understands what still has to be done. She will lead a government working to ensure equality for all and providing every person with the tools they need to succeed. Americans and peace loving people across the globe will all sleep better if Hillary Rodham Clinton takes the oath of office on January 20, 2017. *Wall Street Journal: “Clintons to Attend Mario Cuomo Funeral” <http://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-christie-to-attend-mario-cuomo-wake-1420478396>* By Erica Orden January 5, 2015, 1:11 p.m. EST [Subtitle:] Biden, Christie Among Those At Wake as Last Respects Paid to Liberal Champion Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are set to attend the funeral of former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo on Tuesday, according to spokesmen, while Vice President Joe Biden and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are among political dignitaries expected to join friends and family Monday at the wake. During his presidency, Mr. Clinton considered Mr. Cuomo as a Supreme Court nominee, but Mr. Cuomo said he wasn’t interested. Mr. Cuomo, the father of current New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, died Thursday at age 82, in his home in Manhattan, after suffering from a heart condition for many months. He will be mourned at a wake at the Frank E. Campbell Funeral Home from 1 p.m. to 10 p.m. Mario Cuomo served three terms as governor, rising to prominence with soaring speeches that defended liberalism during the ascendance of President Ronald Reagan’s conservatism in the 1980s. He considered running for president in 1991, drawing national attention for months, but ultimately declined. On Saturday, his son Andrew spoke for the first time publicly about his father’s death, saying “there is a hole in my heart that I fear is going to be there forever.” “We’re going to have his wake and his funeral, but I can say I miss him already,” the governor said, speaking outside a wake being held for New York City police Officer Wenjian Liu, who along with a fellow police officer was fatally shot on Dec. 20. Mr. Cuomo’s Catholic funeral Mass is scheduled for Tuesday at 11 a.m., at St. Ignatius Loyola Church, on the Upper East Side. *New York Daily News: “Bill and Hillary Clinton to attend former Gov. Mario Cuomo's funeral Tuesday” <http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/bill-hillary-clinton-attend-mario-cuomo-funeral-blog-entry-1.2066298>* By Annie Karni and Celeste Katz January 5, 2015, 1:12 p.m. EST Former President Bill Clinton and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will join mourners at Tuesday's funeral service for liberal lion Mario Cuomo. The former three-term governor, 82, passed away last Thursday afternoon of heart failure. "Mario’s life was the very embodiment of the American dream," the Clintons said in a joint statement after Cuomo's death. The Clintons and Cuomos have longstanding political and personal bonds. "When he placed my name in nomination at the 1992 Democratic Convention, he said government had 'the solemn obligation to create opportunity for all our people,'" the Clintons' statement on Cuomo's demise continued. "In his three terms as governor of New York, he honored that obligation.” The list of speakers at the elder Cuomo's funeral has not yet been established, according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's office. Cuomo's funeral service will be held at 11 a.m. Tuesday at St. Ignatius Loyola Church on Park Avenue in Manhattan. Vice President Biden and his wife, Jill, are among those attending Cuomo's wake Monday at the Frank E. Campbell Funeral Home. Viewing hours are from 1 to 5 p.m. and from 7 to 10 p.m. *U.S. News & World Report: “A Resolution for the Contenders” <http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/charles-wheelan/2015/01/05/hillary-clinton-and-jeb-bush-should-run-like-theyre-not-afraid-to-lose>* By Charles Wheelan January 5, 2014, 12:00 p.m. EST [Subtitle:] The only thing Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton should fear is running a lousy campaign. Now is a good time for New Year’s resolutions. Even if most of us fail to live up to our January goals, there is value in our aspirations. (I plan to finish a book manuscript, lose five pounds and spend more time practicing my putting.) More interesting, here is my resolution for former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and ex-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: Run for president, and do it like you are not afraid to lose. This is the political equivalent of dancing like no one is watching. People who are afraid to lose don’t often win – not in sports, not in business, not even in the arts. Fear of losing precludes the risks that typically define major success. If you set out to make a film that will not lose money at the box office, you will end up with “Horrible Bosses 2,” not “Citizen Kane.” Both Bush and Clinton have a lot in common with Mitt Romney, in a good way. They are smart, thoughtful, experienced, politically savvy and altruistic. But if they run the kind of campaigns that Romney ran in 2008 and 2012, both risk losing in the same insipid, humiliating way. More important, neither would win a mandate to govern America the way we need right now. So what does a “run like you’re not afraid to lose” campaign look like? Step One: Survey your life and take account of how good your things would be if you were not elected president in 2016: children, grandchildren, travel, myriad opportunities to make money and do good – all without serious media intrusion. Step Two: Plan your 2016 campaign recognizing that everything I’ve described above is the good stuff that happens if you lose. And it’s really, really good. You shouldn't fear running a good campaign and losing. The worst-case scenario is running a lousy campaign – pandering to interest groups, saying stupid things in the primaries, dodging important questions – and still losing. Don’t pull a Romney. Instead, say things that will change your respective parties and improve our national discourse. Talk about issues in ways that would make it easier to govern if you were to win. Don’t tell us that we can lose weight by eating ice cream. Tell us that we can lose weight by exercising more and eating less. Then, should you find yourself in the Oval Office, we will not be shocked when your weight reduction bill includes things that make us sweat. Voters say they like to hear hard truths like that, but we don’t. We’re suckers for people with good hair who tell us that tax cuts will generate higher government revenues, or that universal health care will pay for itself through new savings, or that climate change isn’t really a problem, or that some international crisis (Syria, Afghanistan or the Israel-Palestine conflict) could be solved if only President Barack Obama were not so feckless/incompetent/political. None of these things is true. Some are Republican shibboleths; some are Democratic ones. If you listen to political talking heads long enough, you’ll hear all of them. Each one is like telling people they can lose weight by eating ice cream. Not only is it bogus, but it renders the real solutions less attractive and therefore less likely to happen. Instead, tell us that climate change is a real threat and that raising the cost of carbon-emitting fuels is the only sensible way to deal with that threat. Tell us that the U.S. is on an unsustainable fiscal path and that any economically and politically viable fix will require both significant changes to our entitlement programs and new revenues. Tell us that you’re not sure what to do in Syria but that you understand the scale of the human crisis and the dangers that such instability poses to the U.S. (Okay, maybe it’s not Syria, but just tell us that you’re not sure about something. Anything.) Remind yourself that primary voters – the die-hard Democrats and Republicans that your consultants and fundraisers are now telling you how to reach – are not only unrepresentative of America but fundamentally out of sync with everything that has to be done should you reach the White House. If the party stalwarts cheer excitedly for something in Iowa or New Hampshire, there is a darn good chance Congress will never pass it. Typical candidates say and do whatever it takes to win the primaries. Then they do the same thing in the general election. Finally, having made all the requisite fibs and promises, they try to govern (while still looking over their shoulder at the primary voters who will be important for re-election). Jeb and Hillary: You are starting from a strong enough position that you have the potential to turn the whole campaign process on its head. First, identify what you would like to do as president. What really has to happen? What accomplishments would justify taking on this horrible job? Then use the campaign to build a coalition to support those changes. If you win, you will have a mandate to change America’s trajectory for the better. If you lose, see No. 1 above. Tell yourself: Gosh darn it, I’m going to be a transformative leader or lose trying. Is this naive? Of course it is. That’s the point of New Year’s resolutions. (When I belonged to a health club in Chicago, I was always relieved in early February when the parking lot was no longer crowded.) Still, I’m reminded of the late Paul Tsongas, the former Massachusetts senator who made a quixotic bid for president in 1992. I covered his campaign as a young journalist. At one point, I asked Tsongas if he really thought he could win. He replied, “I don’t have to win. I just have to run a race that my grandchildren will be proud of.” It’s a great answer, even for candidates who have a very good chance of winning. *Associated Press: “A Year Before 2016, Iowa Full of Presidential Hopefuls” <http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_2016_IOWA_MOVES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>* By Thomas Beaumont January 5, 2015, 12:36 p.m. EST ALTOONA, Iowa (AP) -- Soft laughter rippled through the audience in an Iowa church meeting room when a woman punctuated her question to the keynote speaker, Bernie Sanders, with, "when you're president." The reaction was a gentle acknowledgment that the Vermont senator, whose self-described socialist positions appeal to the hardest-core liberals, is a long shot for the Oval Office. Yet while Democrats and Republicans are waiting for Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jeb Bush and other major prospects to formally kick off the 2016 race in the state with the first presidential caucuses, other lesser known or more unlikely aspirants are already active in Iowa, letting everyone know they're available. They're following a long-established ritual, based on the notion that even far-fetched dreams can come true in a place where friendly people will come out to hear candidates and the media is ever alert for political tremors. Along with Sanders, former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb and Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley among Democrats, and neurosurgeon Ben Carson, a Republican, are among the non-short-listers making contacts in the state, giving speeches and road-testing their messages. Most don't actually say they're running. They're just saying hello. "I don't know if it's an advantage as much as it is laying down a marker, starting to bend the arc of the conversation," said Sue Dvorsky, former Iowa Democratic Party Chairwoman. And this being campaign-steeped Iowa, most seem to draw an audience. On a two-day mid-December trip, Sanders, who is among the Senate's most liberal members, made a series of stops in which he touted expanding government regulation of banking, universal government-funded health care and a $15-per-hour minimum wage. Sanders is one of only two senators who don't identify as Democrat or Republican, though he caucuses and votes with Senate Democrats. Sanders, hunched over a hotel ballroom podium with his tussled shock of white hair, declared that it's time to break up the nation's big banks. "If Teddy Roosevelt were alive today, he would say, and we should say, if these guys are too big to fail, they are too big to exist," Sanders said. Sanders' populist pitch bears some resemblance to that of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the rising star of the Democratic left. But she has said she won't run for president, leaving room for Sanders to hope. Ron Rosenblatt, a financial services company owner, cheered Sanders along with about 150 invited Democrats in the Altoona hotel ballroom. "I like his ability to generate enthusiasm," he said, but at 73, "he's at an age that would make it difficult." O'Malley, known for defending gay marriage and repealing the death penalty, visited Iowa four times last year and contributed more than $45,000 to Iowa candidates and party organizations, which made him friends in convenient places. Governors often make good presidential candidates, and O'Malley, 51, would be one of the few in the Democratic field, fitting somewhere to Clinton's left on the political spectrum. Webb, a former secretary of the Navy, visited in September before announcing his plans to explore a candidacy in November. He would slot to Clinton's right. Clinton visited Iowa twice in 2014 to campaign for Iowa Democrats, but has sent few public signals about her plans, even though most expect her to run. Although national polls 13 months before the Iowa caucuses reflect mostly name familiarity, about 60 percent of likely Democratic primary voters say they would vote for Clinton. Sanders, O'Malley and Webb combine for less than 10 percent. Long shot Republicans have also been busy in Iowa, along with the better known names such as New Jersey's Chris Christie and 2012 Iowa caucuses winner Rick Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has stepped up his Iowa travel, as has former Texas Gov. Rick Perry. Newcomer Carson, 63, a retired Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon who was raised in inner city Detroit, has impressed crowds of curious Republicans on his two trips. Carson, who is African American, ignited curiosity among conservatives after he criticized political correctness, the federal debt and the health care overhaul during the 2013 National Prayer Breakfast, with President Barack Obama in attendance. While Carson isn't well known, other little candidates wound up eventually getting attention here in 2008, such as businessman Herman Cain, before eventually falling. Providing hope to all longshots are Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, who won the 2008 Republican caucuses, and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who came from nowhere in 2004 to challenge eventual Democratic nominee John Kerry. But for every Huckabee, said former GOP chairman Matt Strawn, "There is a Tommy Thompson, Tom Tancredo or Chris Dodd," referring to Iowa competitors who never broke through. Physician Christi Taylor of Waukee, who heard one of Carson's talks, said she was "blown away" by his remarks about personal responsibility. Now she's part of an effort to draft Carson to run. "As someone who likes to evaluate facts, I want to pick the right person, not who has the biggest name in lights," Taylor said. *CNN: “Why U.S. needs to stay in Afghanistan” <http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/05/opinion/bergen-keep-troops-in-afghanistan/index.html>* By Peter Bergen January 5, 2015, 8:04 a.m. EST President Barack Obama says that the last American troops will leave Afghanistan at the end of 2016. This happens to roughly coincide with the end of his second term in office and also fulfills his campaign promise to wind down America's post-9/11 wars. But is it a wise policy? Short answer: Of course not. One only has to look at the debacle that has unfolded in Iraq after the withdrawal of US troops at the end of 2011 to have a sneak preview of what could take place in an Afghanistan without some kind of residual American presence. Without U.S. forces in the country, there is a strong possibility Afghanistan could host a reinvigorated Taliban allied to a reinvigorated al Qaeda. Needless to say, this would be a disaster for Afghanistan. But it would also be quite damaging to U.S. interests to have some kind of resurgent al Qaeda in the country where the group trained the hijackers for the 9/11 attacks. It would also be disastrous for the Democratic Party, should it win the presidency in 2016, to be the party that "lost" Afghanistan. After all, the Democratic Party is viewed by some as weaker on national security than the Republicans and it is inevitable that without some kind of residual American presence in Afghanistan al Qaeda would gain sufficient strength to launch an attack from the Afghan-Pakistan border region against American interests. An easy way for potential Democratic Party presidential candidates such as Hillary Clinton to distinguish their national security policies from Obama's would be to say that they are in favor of some kind of long-term U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and to argue that it would be needed to avoid an Iraq-style outcome there. Similarly, as the Republican Party starts ramping up for the 2016 campaign, potential candidates such as Jeb Bush can distinguish themselves from the isolationist Rand Paul wing of the party by saying that they are committed to a long-term presence in Afghanistan. This U.S. military presence in Afghanistan doesn't have to be a large, nor does it need to play a combat role, but U.S. troops should remain in Afghanistan to advise the Afghan army and provide intelligence support. Such a long-term commitment of several thousand American troops is exactly the kind of force that the Obama administration was forced to deploy to Iraq during the past six months following ISIS's lightning advances. Selling such a long-term U.S. military presence in Afghanistan would be pushing against an open door with that nation's government. Consider that within 24 hours of being installed, the new Afghan government signed the basing agreement that allows American troops to stay in Afghanistan until December 2016. Consider also that the Afghan government has already negotiated a strategic partnership agreement with the United States lasting until 2024 that would provide the framework for a longer term U.S. military presence. Consider also that many Afghans see a relatively small, but long-term international troop presence as a guarantor of their stability. It is also not in Pakistan's interests for Afghanistan to fall to the Taliban or be thrust into another civil war. The Pakistanis have seen for themselves repeatedly the folly of allowing the Taliban to flourish on their own soil, most recently in the Taliban attack last month on the army school in Peshawar that killed 132 children. It is in Pakistan's own interest that the Afghan army is able to fight effectively against the Taliban, which is more likely if they continue to have American advisers at their side. Other regional powers such as the Chinese worry about Chinese Uighur separatists establishing themselves on Afghan soil.The Russians are similarly worried about Islamist terrorist groups located in Afghanistan and so will not stand in the way of a small long-term U.S. military presence in Afghanistan as that would dovetail with their own security concerns about the country. Keeping a relatively small, predominantly U.S. Special Forces, presence in Afghanistan to continue to train the Afghan army past December 2016 is a wise policy that would benefit both Afghans and Americans. Both the Democratic and Republican parties should adopt such a plan in their platforms as they gear up for the 2016 campaign. *Washington Free Beacon: “Chuck Todd: Hillary Clinton Is a Similar Politician to Obama, Not Like Her Husband” <http://freebeacon.com/politics/chuck-todd-hillary-clinton-is-a-similar-politician-to-obama-not-like-her-husband/>* [No Writer Mentioned] January 5, 2015, 8:54 a.m. EST Meet the Press host Chuck Todd says that Hillary Clinton’s political style is close to that of President Obama and unlike that of her Husband, former president Bill Clinton. When asked about Hillary Clinton’s relationship with Obama, Todd said, “I think a lot better than people realize. I have the impression that they are more alike as politicians than for instance hillary and bill are.” Promoting his new book on C-SPAN’s Book TV, Todd said unlike former Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton and Obama both weren’t born with political instincts. Hillary and Obama “both have come to politics on the campaign side of it, the theatric side of it,” Todd said. “They’ve both had to learn it–it’s not instinctual to them.” Todd’s analysis fits with the belief that Hillary Clinton would essentially be a third Obama term to keep his policies intact. *National Journal: “Many Iowa Democratic Leaders Want Contested Caucuses” <http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/latest-edition/many-iowa-democratic-leaders-want-contested-caucuses-20150105>* By Adam Wollner January 5, 2015 "Iowa Democratic leaders say they are troubled by the prospect that" former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) "could win the state's 2016 presidential caucuses without a serious challenge, a view primarily rooted in a desire for a more liberal candidate or at least a robust debate about the party's policies and direction ... Many county officials said they would like to see" Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) run. "State Democratic officials also want a contested race because that boosts the party apparatus and fundraising." (*Wall Street Journal* <http://www.wsj.com/articles/top-iowa-democrats-slow-to-rally-around-hillary-clinton-1420418121?cb=logged0.42685506539419293> )