👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (533 words)
From: Joi ito
Sent: Wednes ay, ay , 2018 3:38 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Re: Researchers can't evaluate novel ideas
I can talk at 5PM ET for 30 min if you're free (will be in car).
> On May 16, 2018, at 11:27, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
> No , Paris after 4 eastern
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 5:23 PM Joi ito M=.> wrote:
> What time zone are you in? Can you talk at 1PM ET?
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:35, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
> can talk when you like
>>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:19 PM Joi ito [email protected]> wrote:
> https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285
>>
» Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier:
» =ntellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
>>
> Selecting among alternative projects is a core management task in =11 innovating organizations. In this paper, we
focus on the evaluation =f frontier scientific research projects. We argue that the =E2 intellectual distance" between the
knowledge embodied =n research proposals and an evaluator's own expertise =ystematically relates to the evaluations
given. To estimate =elationships, we designed and executed a grant proposal process at a =eading research university in
which we randomized the assignment of =valuators and proposals to generate 2,130 evaluator—proposal =airs. We find
that evaluators systematically give lower scores to =esearch proposals that are closer to their own areas of expertise and
=o those that are highly novel. The patterns are consistent with biases =ssociated with boundedly rational evaluation of
new ideas. The patterns =re inconsistent with intellectual distance simply contributing =E2 noise" or being associated
with private interests of =valuators. We discuss implications for policy, managerial intervention, =nd allocation of
resources in the ongoing accumulation of scientific =nowledge.
>>
>>
>>
> > --
>> please note
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, may
> be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information,
> and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the
> property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
» communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be
» unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
» notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
> [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies
EFTA_R1_01913558
EFTA02663873
> thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
> please note
> The information contained in this communication is confidential, may
> be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and
> is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of
> JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or
> any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected],
> and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
> attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
<?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<IDOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">
<dict>
<key>conversation-id</key>
<integer>6427</integer>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1526485079</integer>
<key>flags</key>
<integer>8590195713</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>821778</string>
</dict>
</plist>
2
EFTA_R1_01913559
EFTA02663874
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5af2775f54171f88db3087167210e43efeff531a8da7ccc7de91fa3b48fa9092
Bates Number
EFTA02663873
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0