📄 Extracted Text (1,172 words)
From: Richard Joslin
To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, lawrence delson
Subject: FW: Meadow Lane Lot Merger
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:03:48 +0000
preliminary review
There are in effect two real property transfers. The transfer of the LLC interest (holding real property interest X) from
trust to LDB/DRB and the transfer of real property Y from LDB/DRB to LLC. If the trust retains control of SHM Meadow, it
would seem that there would not be a transfer tax despite the dilution since the trust maintains control (i.e. >50% interest
in profits/ capital). If the trust gives up controlling ownership of SH Meadow then there would be transfer tax on the
amount transferred to LDB/DRB (property X) . For LDB/DRB real property Y, the transfer to SH Meadow should be a
taxable transfer to the extent there is any change in ownership, ie if he gets back a 44% interest in SH Meadow then the
transfer tax is 56% of the property transferred.
We are calling real estate attorney at PW to get guidance on beneficial ownership, ie who is the beneficial owner of the
trust?
Note that there is a TSB that indicates real property transfer tax owed on transfer of real property to a GRAT. Point is that
the GRAT may fail and still a transfer tax was owed at outset. SO NYS does not look at grantor trust rules of ownership.
Query if we put the real property into series LLC or convert SH Meadow to series LLC and have each contributor retain
interests in the property notwithstanding that the properties are merged. A long shot.
From: Ada Clapp
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Richard Joslin
Cc: Eileen Alexanderson; Heather Gray
Subject: Meadow Lane Lot Merger
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your help with the tax issue that has arisen in connection with merging the two Meadow Lane lots.
Let me give you some background before I outline the question for you.
In 2013, SH Meadow Lane LLC (the "LLC") purchased 715 Meadow lane (an improved lot) for $8.3 million.
The LLC is wholly owned by the APO2 Declaration. Debra and Leon's descendants are discretionary
beneficiaries of the APO2 Declaration—which means that they are not entitled to receive any trust property (so
they have no fixed beneficial interest) but may receive trust income and principal in the sole discretion of the
Trustees.
The LLC wants to tear down the current residence and build a new one. Because the construction is within 300-
feet of tidal wetlands, a Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC") permit is necessary. The main reason
the DEC granted a permit for construction which does not meet its minimum setback requirements, is that the
permit application offered to merge title to 715 Meadow Lane with the adjacent vacant property to the West of
it. The merger was also a key element in gaining Southampton Village approval. Construction cannot proceed
until title to the two lots are merged in the name of the LLC (to which the conditional permit was issued).
EFTA00869432
The adjacent vacant lot to the West is owned by Leon and Debra. They purchased it in 1993. We do not know
what they paid or its current fair market value but it was assessed by the Town at about $6.3 million. We are in
the process of having the vacant lot appraised.
The lots have aol been merged as yet because we are trying to decide how best to do that. To possibly take
advantage of a tax exception noted below, Jeffrey suggested that Debra (and not Leon) contribute the vacant lot
to the LLC in exchange for membership interests. The question is whether doing so will trigger a NYS real
estate transfer tax and a Peconic Tax.
The LI real estate attorney did not know the answer to this question and suggested that I speak with counsel for
the title company or with a tax expert. I spoke with Spencer, Counsel for the title company, (no names of
course) who noted that both taxes are based on the transfer of "consideration" and that the Town (Peconic Tax is
a town tax) follows NYS law regarding what constitutes consideration. He noted that consideration is broadly
defined in the NY tax law and in his view, would include the receipt of a membership interests in an LLC in
exchange for a contribution of vacant land.
Spencer speculated that if the beneficial owners of the LLC and the owners of the vacant lot were the same, one
could possibly argue that there was no consideration. The claim would be that because no change in beneficial
ownership occurred as a result of the contribution, neither the LLC nor the owners of the vacant lot received
consideration (it would be like selling real estate to yourself). However, in our case, because Leon's
descendants also have a beneficial interest in LLC property—but do not have an interest in the vacant lot—
Spencer was not sure we could claim this consideration "exception." He suggested that we call the NYS
Department of Taxation Mortgage Recording Tax and ask them the question (again, no names). Their number is
518-457-8637. He also noted that you could send the question in an email, to which they would respond via
email and that you could file their email response with the transfer tax form claiming the no consideration
exception. You would send the email to [email protected]. Since it is
more appropriate for you to deal with the NYS taxing authorities than me, I would be grateful if you would call
or email the question to them.
We can't merge the lots until we resolve this issue—and they can't start building until the lots are merged so
there is some time sensitivity. If both taxes are triggered by a contribution to the LLC, it may be preferable from
an estate tax standpoint for Leon to sell the lot to the LLC (which would at least get the appreciation on the
property out ofLeon and Debra's estate)-rather than to have Debra contribute it to the LLC.
As you are working from home today and I am out tomorrow through next Thursday, after today please reach out
to Heather for any assistance or information you may need on this matter. Much of the information you will
need is on the 0 drive but Heather also has it (deeds, trust agreement, LLC agreement, etc.) so please reach out
to her in my absence. Of course I am available to discuss anytime today.
Thanks in advance.
Ada Clapp
Elysium Management LLC
445 Park Avenue
Suite 1401
New York, New York 10022
Email:
This communication and any attachment is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and/or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that further
EFTA00869433
dissemination of this communication and its attachments is prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication
and its attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in error. Thank you.
EFTA00869434
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5bddf98b4594db1ac5a32dd4b385fef7aa646f770dbd31b2bdbe956b859bf7d1
Bates Number
EFTA00869432
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0