👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (554 words)
Americas Region Reputational Risk Committee Policy Deutsche Bank
Section 1: Scope and Responsibility
The Americas Region supports business practices that comply with the Group Reputational Risk
Management Program, as outlined in the DB Group Reputational Risk Management Program Policy
dated May 9, 2011, and also complies with the requirements of the Group "Conduct of Meetings" policy.
Within the Americas region, consideration of all reputational risk issues is the responsibility of the
Americas Regional Governance Board (RGB). The RGB has delegated such consideration to the
Americas Reputational Risk Committee (ARRC), a permanent sub-committee of the RGB.
The governance requirements described in this remit are applicable to all businesses, infrastructure
groups and employees in the United States, Canada, Latin America and the Cayman Islands.
1.1 Mission
The ARRC functions as the senior regional approval and oversight committee in the Americas for
reputational risk. The ARRC is responsible for the development of a regional reputational risk appetite,
setting standards for ARRC review, establishing criteria for escalation within and outside the region, and
providing guidance to assist the Business Divisions in identifying reputational risk issues for escalation to
the ARRC. The ARRC provides oversight of the regional reputational risk appetite.
1.2 Tasks and Responsibilities of the ARRC
The ARRC is responsible for reviewing, assessing, and opining on all reputational risk issues brought to
the ARRC by businesses or Control & Support functions. Resolution of an issue means that the
Committee may approve, approve with conditions, defer or reject any proposal presented. The ARRC
is also responsible for escalating issues that cannot or should not be decided within the region (see
Section 8). The ARRC has a responsibility to report all actions taken within the region through the RRN
(Reputational Risk Network) for further aggregation on a global level. Lastly, the ARRC sets and
monitors the regional risk appetite for reputational risk.
The ARRC escalates unresolved issues first to the RGB and then if necessary to the North America
Executive Committee (ExCo) regionally, and to the Group Reputational Risk Committee globally.
Within the Americas region, all transacting businesses and/or reviewing Control & Support functions, are
required to bring to the ARRC for review any transactions that give rise to a new reputational risk or
increase an existing risk. Reputational risk, as defined in Group Policy, is:
"...The threat that publicity concerning a transaction, counterparty or business practice involving a
client will negatively impact the public's trust in DB..."
Such risk can be found when adopting a client, undertaking a transaction, pursuing a particular business
activity or proposition, or even in associating DB's name with that of a particular client, company or
industry.
A Reputational Risk Analysis Desk Guide (Appendix 1) has been developed by Compliance and Legal
to assist businesses and control functions in reviewing the reputational risk aspects of a transaction or
other venture, so that the decision to escalate issues for a reputational risk review can be made in an
informed manner.
Appendix 2 contains the criteria the business should apply when identifying reputational risk issues to
be escalated to the ARRC. The grid defines which transactions can be handled within the business,
within the business but with reporting to the ARRC and escalated to the ARRC for pre-approval.
2
For internal use only
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0028800
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00174984
EFTA01343863
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5eb1c30db27ee5ba41bc6674f6adbd2037049dbe3071c52a32bb6926f629122a
Bates Number
EFTA01343863
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0