👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,109 words)
From: Eileen Alexanderson
To: "Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation(a grnail.com)" [email protected]>
Subject: FW: Tax considerations
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:28:43 +0000
From: [email protected] [mailto:
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 7:51 AM
To: Eileen Alexanderson
Cc: 'Brad R Okun'• David Lakhdhir; 'Thomas Turrin'
Subject: Tax considerations - follow up from last nights call
Eileen
As promised, please find below our thoughts on the questions raised last night on which I agreed to reply to.
Nature of Partnership
As we discussed on the call last night, the choice of a Scottish LP is due to the fact that the Scottish LP is a well
recognised and established vehicle used for tax planning, particularly with the US, where as a result of its separate legal
personality it entity classification as a partnership is clear in overseas jurisdictions. This compares to the English LP's
where due to the fact that these do not have separate legal personality this can lead to complications regarding the entity
classification and can lead to problems in how they are recognised in tax planning arrangements with foreign partners. As
such the SLP is the preferred choice in tax planning arrangements.
In terms of the formation of an SLP, Macfarlanes are correct in that Scottish counsel would be needed to form the SLP and
that the General Partner would need to have a Scottish registered address, however, this is often solved in practice by the
General Partner having its registered address at the offices of the Scottish Counsel.
The alternative is the limited liability partnership which Macfarlanes have also mentioned which is a partnership in the UK
which like the SLP also has separate legal personality and therefore would be an alternative to use. The one point to note
with using an LLP, however, is that the financial statements of the LLP would require to be prepared and audited here in the
UK so there would be a cost associated with that. From a tax perspective, however, the LLP is like the SLP in that it is
transparent and would not be subject to UK taxation since the partnership is only holding investments in the UK.
Economic interest of the General partner
In terms of whether the General partner is required to have an economic interest in the partnership, the General partner
would be expected to have an interest however this interest would be nominal i.e. something like 0.001%. The majority of
the income profits and any capital profits would then be allocated to the limited partners (see below for comments on
limited partners).
Debt
Due to the timing for completion and the importance of getting the documentation correct and everyone comfortable on the
tax position for the debt what we would suggest is undertaken at this time is that a short term loan is put in place between
the Partnership and Midco. This loan should be for a maximum period of 360 days and the intention will be to replace this
within this time frame. What this will provide is as follows:
• Interest charged on the short term loan will be deductible (provided amount of debt and the interest rate charged is
arms length as we have discussed previously) in the period in which the interest is charged.
• As a short term loan, the settlement of the interest when the loan is replaced (which can be achieved on cash free
basis) will not be subject to any UK withholding tax.
EFTA00642290
• We will have 360 days in which to come up with a form of debt which everyone is comfortable with and which
manages both the timing of future deductions and the withholding tax position on the debt. It also allows us the time
to make sure that the documentation for such debt is acceptable from UK tax perspective and avoids any risk of
things being missed pre-completion.
As a short term loan agreement this should be something which is relatively straight forward to draft and then as noted
above post completion we can consider the best method to get the long term debt planning drafted.
In terms of the partners in the partnership and whether we should have the trusts come through an LLC rather than as
being partners themselves, we believe that having the trusts invest in to the partnership through an LLC would be the most
appropriate method. We would suggest that the 3 trusts which are not currently members of an LLC become members in
the new LLC and that LLC becomes the first of the limited partners in the partnership whilst the 2nd LLC (being the one
that currently exists and in which the 4 Delaware trusts are members) becomes the 2nd limited partner in the partnership.
I think that covers the open questions that we had. Let me know if there is anything I have missed or if you wish to discuss
further.
Best regards
Gregor
Gregor Lindsay
Nye Senior Manazer M&A Tax
ricewater louse oopers
7 More London, Riverside, London, SEt 2RT
---------------- End of message text --------------—
We're proud to sponsor the PwC Under 25s Club at the Old Vic: Opening up the arts to the under 25s, because support for
the arts benefits business and society as a whole. Find out more about the PwC Under 25s Club at
http://www.pwc.co.uk/who-we-are/the-old-vic-helping-to-start-something.jhtml
-----------------------------------------------------—
This email is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please delete the email and
do not use it in any way. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not accept or assume responsibility for any use of or reliance
on this email by anyone, other than the intended addressee to the extent agreed in the relevant contract for the matter to
which this email relates (if any). PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England under
registered number OC303525, with its registered address at 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6RH. It is authorised
and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for designated investment business. PwC may monitor outgoing and
incoming emails and other telecommunications on its email and telecommunications systems; by replying to this email you
give your consent to such monitoring.
---------------------------------------------
Visit our website http://www.pwc.comiuk
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the person or entity to whom they are
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please contact the sender and delete the material from
any computer.
Apollo Global Management, LLC
EFTA00642291
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
5f619eb66f5ff2a5ab458202ae96bf09b6419a4a74516dd1f96304d31c8fc7d5
Bates Number
EFTA00642290
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0