podesta_email_05325.txt

podesta-emails 4,818 words email

D6 P22 V11 P17 P20

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Monday September 29, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton>’s State Department sponsored teacher exchange programs focused on education for girls. http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-education-for-girls-futures … <http://t.co/Nirv28P4Vn> [9/29/14, 12:41 p.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/516628743335317504>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: .@HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> unveiled a new program to provide secondary education for 14 million girls over five years. http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-education-for-girls-futures … <http://t.co/Nirv28P4Vn> [9/29/14, 11:59 a.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/516618184338583552>] *Correct The Record* @CorrectRecord: NEW RECORD ANALYSIS: @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> and Education for Girls' Futures http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-education-for-girls-futures … <http://t.co/JL2nvF6NW1> [9/29/14, 11:52 a.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/516616578147033088>] *Headlines:* *Wall Street Journal: “Hillary Clinton Focuses on the Policy, Not the Personal” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-focuses-on-the-policy-not-the-personal-1412004597>* “Already one of the country's best-known figures, Mrs. Clinton is playing down her personal story and instead keeping issues front and center.” *Chicago Sun-Times blog: Politics: “Hillary Clinton hitting Illinois to stump for Gov. Quinn” <http://politics.suntimes.com/article/washington/hillary-clinton-hitting-illinois-stump-gov-quinn/mon-09292014-1000am>* “Clinton had been on the calendar for Oct. 8--though the birth of her granddaughter on Friday may change her schedule.” *CNN: “Obama subtly pushes back against Clinton, Panetta on Syria” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/29/politics/obama-clinton-syria/index.html>* “President Barack Obama, over the last two years, has seen his top two former national security Cabinet officials critique his foreign policy decision in Syria. Now the President has gently pushed back.” *The Press Trust of India (in The Economic Times): “Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets Bill and Hillary Clinton” <http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/prime-minister-narendra-modi-meets-bill-and-hillary-clinton/articleshow/43826987.cms>* “Former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton today called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi here and discussed Indo-US relations.” *Washingtonian: Capital Comment: “In Virginia’s 10th District, It’s Hillary Clinton’s Race to Lose” <http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/politics/in-virginias-10th-district-its-hillary-clintons-race-to-lose.php>* “For more than a year, one name has trumped all others in Virginia politics: Hillary.” *Al Jazeera America opinion: Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research: “Hard choices: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup” <http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html>* “Like the 54-year-old failed embargo against Cuba, Clinton’s position on Latin America in her bid for the presidency is another example of how the far right exerts disproportionate influence on U.S. foreign policy in the hemisphere.” *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “O’Malley in NH: Nation wants ‘new leaders’” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/219161-omalley-in-new-hampshire-people-want-new-leaders#.VCmELa9jX8R.twitter>* “Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), who is considering a 2016 presidential bid, said in New Hampshire that people want to hear from ‘new leaders.’” *New York Times: “A Record of Resilience at Vanguard of American Presidential Politics” <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/us/a-record-of-resilience-at-vanguard-of-american-presidential-politics.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0>* “Twenty-two years after he won the White House and six years after his wife’s near miss for the Democratic nomination, former President Bill Clinton again stands in the thick of the competition for the nation’s highest office. That makes Mr. Clinton, who addressed his first national convention at age 33 and on Friday became a grandfather at 68, the most durable high-stakes player ever in American presidential politics.” *Articles:* *Wall Street Journal: “Hillary Clinton Focuses on the Policy, Not the Personal” <http://online.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-focuses-on-the-policy-not-the-personal-1412004597>* By Peter Nicholas September 29, 2014, 11:29 a.m. EDT NEW YORK—When he first ran for president, Barack Obama's themes were "hope" and "change." Hillary Clinton, appearing at a conference last week, trumpeted what she called "evidence-based optimism." That isn't a phrase that lends itself to a campaign slogan, but these days it captures the unsentimental approach Mrs. Clinton is bringing to policy debates ahead of the 2016 presidential contest. Already one of the country's best-known figures, Mrs. Clinton is playing down her personal story and instead keeping issues front and center. Her message is that she would bring to American politics a competence and analytical rigor. Mrs. Clinton's office declined to comment for this article. But to the degree she is revealing much of anything about her private life, it is to gush over her growing family. Her daughter, Chelsea, gave birth Friday to Charlotte Clinton Mezvinsky, making Mrs. Clinton a first-time grandmother at 66 years old. In a Saturday tweet—accompanied by a picture of her cradling the baby—Mrs. Clinton wrote that she and her husband were "over the moon to be grandparents!" She also has begun emphasizing her roots in the Midwest, a region that can be a political bellwether. But while some potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates are showcasing their personalities as a reason to like and trust them, Mrs. Clinton for the most part is making clear she would rather talk about something else. If the material is distinctly dry and unsexy, Mrs. Clinton doesn't seem to mind. Mr. Obama defeated her in the 2008 Democratic primary in part because voters found his message and life story inspiring. But Mrs. Clinton doesn't seem to be betting that charisma will decide things in 2016. She is bemoaning what she calls the "evidence-free zone" in American politics while celebrating "data" as the indispensable tool in choosing the best options. "Data, data, data," she said at a Clinton Global Initiative panel discussion—another phrase not likely to find its way onto a bumper sticker. She talked about brain "hardware" and "neural connections" during one panel about childhood development and mused about new ways to measure gross domestic product during another appearance. "We obsess over metrics, get excited about data," Mrs. Clinton said in a closing speech at the conference. Her focus insulates her to some degree from Republican attacks in the run-up to her announcement on whether she'll be a candidate once more. It is hard to muster an attack based on a call for better data in American policy-making. What's more, when she has ventured into details about her personal life, she has gotten into trouble. Some of her former advisers cringed earlier this year when the former first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state said she hadn't driven a car since 1996–a result of her being under constant Secret Service protection. And she garnered little sympathy when she told a TV interviewer in June that she and her husband were "dead broke" when they left the White House in 2001. "Once she leaves the policy space and moves into personality, she just opens herself up to a broad range of attacks," said Tad Devine, who worked for the presidential campaigns of Democrats Al Gore and John Kerry, among others. "It is much harder for opponents to deal with you as long as you occupy the policy space." "Her comfort zone is talking more about policies and ideas than it is talking about herself and who she is," said Peter Peyser, a longtime Democratic lobbyist. If she runs for president, Mrs. Clinton eventually will need to present herself as more than a vessel for certain policy ideas, analysts say. Voters want to feel a connection to presidential candidates, and Mrs. Clinton would need to give them one. "She can be wonkette for some time, but running for president requires more than being a propeller head," said Bill Whalen, who worked for former Republican President George H.W. Bush's campaign in 1992. "You also have to propel a personality." On the Republican side, prospective candidates are doing just that. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is emphasizing his bluntness and candor. Another potential GOP candidate, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, is underscoring his independent streak—a willingness to part ways with fellow Republicans who are quicker to call for U.S. military intervention. In recent weeks, Mrs. Clinton has dropped hints about the pieces of her personal life she is likely to showcase on the campaign trail. Family is emerging as major theme. In addition to talking about her new grandchild she also has been sharing stories about the hardships her late mother endured as a child. Expect Mrs. Clinton to invoke such biographical bits in pressing for policies that help shore up American families, one member of her circle said. "One of the themes you're going to see a lot of is these issues around family," this person said. "She can talk about that, and in a way, she's living that." *Chicago Sun-Times blog: Politics: “Hillary Clinton hitting Illinois to stump for Gov. Quinn” <http://politics.suntimes.com/article/washington/hillary-clinton-hitting-illinois-stump-gov-quinn/mon-09292014-1000am>* By Lynn Sweet September 29, 2014, 9:00 a.m. CDT Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, raised in north suburban Park Ridge, will be stumping for Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, I've learned. Quinn is locked in a tight race with GOP nominee Bruce Rauner. This comes as President Barack Obama hits Chicago on Thursday for Quinn and first lady Michelle comes home on Oct. 7. Clinton, mulling a 2016 presidential run, does not need the headache of a GOP governor in Illinois if she makes her bid. Clinton had been on the calendar for Oct. 8--though the birth of her granddaughter on Friday may change her schedule. *CNN: “Obama subtly pushes back against Clinton, Panetta on Syria” <http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/29/politics/obama-clinton-syria/index.html>* By Dan Merica September 29, 2014, 12:46 p.m. EDT President Barack Obama, over the last two years, has seen his top two former national security Cabinet officials critique his foreign policy decision in Syria. Now the President has gently pushed back. In an interview with CBS' "60 Minutes" that aired on Sunday, Obama said that arming Syrian rebels in 2012 in their fight against President Bashar al-Assad "would have been counterproductive." "This is in response to the mythology that has evolved that somehow if we had given those folks some guns two and a half years ago, than Syria would be fine," Obama said about the 2012 plans. "For us to just go blind on that would have been counterproductive and would not have helped the situation. It also would have committed us to a much more significant role inside of Syria." Earlier this month, the President authorized a plan to arm and train rebels in Syria fighting against ISIS, a terrorist group that has swept into power in areas in both Syria and Iraq. Obama's plan also authorizes airstrikes against ISIS targets. Former top Obama administration officials, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, have publicly disagreed with the president on Syria. Clinton wrote in her memoir "Hard Choices" that she split with Obama on Syria and urged the president to arm the rebels. In an interview with The Atlantic in August, Clinton said, "The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad ... the failure to do that left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled." And just last week, at the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative, the former secretary of state dodged a question on whether arming the rebels was coming too late, given the recent rise of ISIS in Syria. "Whatever the debates might have been before, this is a threat to the region and beyond," Clinton said. "I can't sit here today and tell you that if we had done what I had recommended we would be in a very different position. I just can't. You can't go and prove a negative." Clinton does support Obama's plan to arm rebels and launch airstrikes against ISIS in Syria. Panetta echoed Clinton's Syria sentiments and knocked the president in an interview with "60 Minutes" earlier this month. "I think that would've helped," the former defense chief said about arming rebels. "And I think, in part, we pay the price for not doing that in what we see happening with ISIS." *The Press Trust of India (in The Economic Times): “Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets Bill and Hillary Clinton” <http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/prime-minister-narendra-modi-meets-bill-and-hillary-clinton/articleshow/43826987.cms>* [No Writer Mentioned] September 29, 2014, 9:54 p.m. IST NEW YORK: Former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton today called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi here and discussed Indo-US relations. The Clinton couple had a 45-minute meeting with Modi, who was accompanied by External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj. Both the Prime Minister and Swaraj warmly welcomed the Clintons and wished them on becoming grandparents. Swaraj warmly hugged Hillary. Chelsea, the daughter of Bill and former Secretary of State Hillary, gave birth to daughter Charlotte last week. Known for their love for India, Bill and Hillary were expected to discuss Indo-US engagements and the priorities of the new government in this regard. The meeting comes in the backdrop of reports that Hillary may contest the US Presidential elections in 2016. *Washingtonian: Capital Comment: “In Virginia’s 10th District, It’s Hillary Clinton’s Race to Lose” <http://www.washingtonian.com/blogs/capitalcomment/politics/in-virginias-10th-district-its-hillary-clintons-race-to-lose.php>* By Harry Jaffe September 29, 2014 [Subtitle:] Why all local politics in Virginia have become national. For more than a year, one name has trumped all others in Virginia politics: Hillary. “Hillary Clinton’s first test,” was how Politico characterized Governor Terry McAuliffe’s campaign last summer, suggesting it was merely a dry run for the consultants, pollsters, bundlers, and other moving parts of Hillary’s 50-state 2016 vehicle. Or as another website asked: Is McAuliffe “nothing more than Hillary’s stalking horse?” Now comes the congressional race in Virginia’s 10th District, in which the Republican candidate, Barbara Comstock, a flame-throwing conservative Republican state delegate, embellished her primary win by bashing the Clintons and vowing to “get to the bottom of the truth in Benghazi.” Meanwhile, Comstock’s opponent, Fairfax County supervisor John Foust, is getting help from ’90s-era Bill Clinton aide Paul Begala, who’s been issuing poison tweets about Comstock. Virginia’s politics isn’t being stalked; it’s been kidnapped. The increasingly national flavor of the Commonwealth’s local elections is partly a function of its DC suburbs. McAuliffe, Comstock, and Begala—as well as GOP strategist Ed Gillespie, running for the US Senate against Mark Warner, and Newt Gingrich, a longtime supporter of Comstock—call Northern Virginia home. When they run for office, they end up squaring off against old federal-level foes. As an aide to Representative Frank Wolf in the early 1990s, Comstock made her name investigating the Clintons. She triggered the minor scandal known as Travelgate and had a hand in Filegate and Monicagate. “It’s as if these old Beltway grudge matches are being rehashed where so many of these players now live,” says David Wasserman, with the Cook Political Report. Another reason national politics has intruded is that Virginia increasingly looks like the nation. Once “solid South,” the state has become a bellwether. “There’s no better laboratory,” says a Democratic Party operative. The 10th District is Virginia in microcosm. Spanning the urban-oriented enclaves of Fairfax and the apple orchards around Winchester, it leans left on its eastern end and squats solidly Republican in the west. The area in between, around Dulles and the exurbs of Leesburg, bulges with Asian and Hispanic newcomers. “If you want to take the temperature of the country,” says Kyle Kondik of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, “this might be a good district to pick.” Those demographics mean the fight for the district’s seat will produce more partisan heat than its constituents bargained for. The Democratic and Republican congressional campaign committees have set aside more than $2 million each to contest this small scrap of battleground. But the 10th’s political diversity may guarantee residents the local election they deserve. Already, Comstock has ditched her anti-Clinton rhetoric to appeal to moderate suburbanites. “I’m a doer and not interested in continuing these fights,” she told Washingtonian. Foust is still trying to stick Comstock with the GOP’s entire ’90s tally—“She spent four years and over $80 million to investigate the Clintons and found basically nothing,” he says—but to win in November, he’ll also need to address jobs, health care, and traffic. Not that he’d refuse if Hillary showed up to campaign for him. Says Foust: “I definitely would welcome that.” *Al Jazeera America opinion: Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research: “Hard choices: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup” <http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/9/hillary-clinton-honduraslatinamericaforeignpolicy.html>* By Mark Weisbrot September 29, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EDT [Subtitle:] Clinton’s embrace of far-right narrative on Latin America is part of electoral strategy In a recent op-ed in The Washington Post, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a review of Henry Kissinger’s latest book, “World Order,” to lay out her vision for “sustaining America’s leadership in the world.” In the midst of numerous global crises, she called for return to a foreign policy with purpose, strategy and pragmatism. She also highlighted some of these policy choices in her memoir “Hard Choices” and how they contributed to the challenges that Barack Obama’s administration now faces. The chapter on Latin America, particularly the section on Honduras, a major source of the child migrants currently pouring into the United States, has gone largely unnoticed. In letters to Clinton and her successor, John Kerry, more than 100 members of Congress have repeatedly warned about the deteriorating security situation in Honduras, especially since the 2009 military coup that ousted the country’s democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. As Honduran scholar Dana Frank points out in Foreign Affairs, the U.S.-backed post-coup government “rewarded coup loyalists with top ministries,” opening the door for further “violence and anarchy.” The homicide rate in Honduras, already the highest in the world, increased by 50 percent from 2008 to 2011; political repression, the murder of opposition political candidates, peasant organizers and LGBT activists increased and continue to this day. Femicides skyrocketed. The violence and insecurity were exacerbated by a generalized institutional collapse. Drug-related violence has worsened amid allegations of rampant corruption in Honduras’ police and government. While the gangs are responsible for much of the violence, Honduran security forces have engaged in a wave of killings and other human rights crimes with impunity. Despite this, however, both under Clinton and Kerry, the State Department’s response to the violence and military and police impunity has largely been silence, along with continued U.S. aid to Honduran security forces. In “Hard Choices,” Clinton describes her role in the aftermath of the coup that brought about this dire situation. Her firsthand account is significant both for the confession of an important truth and for a crucial false testimony. First, the confession: Clinton admits that she used the power of her office to make sure that Zelaya would not return to office. “In the subsequent days [after the coup] I spoke with my counterparts around the hemisphere, including Secretary [Patricia] Espinosa in Mexico,” Clinton writes. “We strategized on a plan to restore order in Honduras and ensure that free and fair elections could be held quickly and legitimately, which would render the question of Zelaya moot.” This may not come as a surprise to those who followed the post-coup drama closely. (See my commentary from 2009 on Washington’s role in helping the coup succeed here, here and here.) But the official storyline, which was dutifully accepted by most in the media, was that the Obama administration actually opposed the coup and wanted Zelaya to return to office. The question of Zelaya was anything but moot. Latin American leaders, the United Nations General Assembly and other international bodies vehemently demanded his immediate return to office. Clinton’s defiant and anti-democratic stance spurred a downward slide in U.S. relations with several Latin American countries, which has continued. It eroded the warm welcome and benefit of the doubt that even the leftist governments in region offered to the newly installed Obama administration a few months earlier. Clinton’s false testimony is even more revealing. She reports that Zelaya was arrested amid “fears that he was preparing to circumvent the constitution and extend his term in office.” This is simply not true. As Clinton must know, when Zelaya was kidnapped by the military and flown out of the country in his pajamas on June 28, 2009, he was trying to put a consultative, nonbinding poll on the ballot to ask voters whether they wanted to have a real referendum on reforming the constitution during the scheduled election in November. It is important to note that Zelaya was not eligible to run in that election. Even if he had gotten everything he wanted, it was impossible for Zelaya to extend his term in office. But this did not stop the extreme right in Honduras and the United States from using false charges of tampering with the constitution to justify the coup. In addition to her bold confession and Clinton’s embrace of the far-right narrative in the Honduran episode, the Latin America chapter is considerably to the right of even her own record on the region as secretary of state. This appears to be a political calculation. There is little risk of losing votes for admitting her role in making most of the hemisphere’s governments disgusted with the United States. On the other side of the equation, there are influential interest groups and significant campaign money to be raised from the right-wing Latin American lobby, including Floridian Cuban-Americans and their political fundraisers. Like the 54-year-old failed embargo against Cuba, Clinton’s position on Latin America in her bid for the presidency is another example of how the far right exerts disproportionate influence on U.S. foreign policy in the hemisphere. *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “O’Malley in NH: Nation wants ‘new leaders’” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/219161-omalley-in-new-hampshire-people-want-new-leaders#.VCmELa9jX8R.twitter>* By Peter Sullivan September 29, 2014, 9:52 a.m. EDT Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), who is considering a 2016 presidential bid, said in New Hampshire that people want to hear from "new leaders." The remark will be seen as a criticism of Hillary Clinton, who has been on the national stage for years, and would be the Democratic frontrunner if she enters the race. The trip to New Hampshire, “reinforced the hunch I had that people want to hear a new perspective, that they want to hear from new leaders,” O’Malley told New York magazine in a story published Sunday night. “I think that reality is very much out there," he added. O'Malley spoke at the Portsmouth, N.H., Democrats' annual dinner on Friday. The appearance in the home of the nation's first presidential primary featured a video touting O'Malley's work to turn around Baltimore, as mayor, and Maryland, as governor. O'Malley has made no secret of the fact that he is considering a presidential run. He has sent staff to help on campaigns this year in states including Iowa and New Hampshire, and has made repeated trips to both early-voting states. At this stage, though, polls give him just one or two points of support, compared to well over 50 percent for Clinton. *New York Times: “A Record of Resilience at Vanguard of American Presidential Politics” <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/us/a-record-of-resilience-at-vanguard-of-american-presidential-politics.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share&_r=0>* By John Harwood September 28, 2014 WASHINGTON — Obscured in all the talk about Hillary Rodham Clinton and the 2016 race is a historical achievement unrelated to gender. Twenty-two years after he won the White House and six years after his wife’s near miss for the Democratic nomination, former President Bill Clinton again stands in the thick of the competition for the nation’s highest office. That makes Mr. Clinton, who addressed his first national convention at age 33 and on Friday became a grandfather at 68, the most durable high-stakes player ever in American presidential politics. It does not make him the most successful or influential president, and he tops no academic lists of the all-time greats. Unlike Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Richard M. Nixon, each of whom appeared on five national ballots, Mr. Clinton stood for election nationwide only twice. His stature on leaving office, in contrast to President Ronald Reagan’s, proved insufficient to secure the election of his vice president to the White House. He never won a majority of the popular vote, as President Obama has done twice. And he is one of only two presidents impeached by the House of Representatives. (Andrew Johnson — who had been Lincoln’s vice president, and never elected to the top job at all — was the other, more than century earlier.) Yet Mr. Clinton’s Cal Ripken-like determination to keep showing up, and a White House record that glows brighter in memory, have sustained his appeal across a turn of centuries, three decades and multiple generations of swing voters. As he played host last week to the current president and perhaps the next one (his wife) at the Clinton Global Initiative, one historian likened him to a rare creature built for longevity at high altitudes. “He’s been a snow leopard longer than any other president,” the historian, Douglas Brinkley of Rice University, said. “There’s been nobody like Bill Clinton who’s played that long at the very top.” Barring a constitutional amendment, Roosevelt will remain the only American to win the presidency more than twice. But he died in office 13 years after the first of his four victories in 1932. Mr. Reagan electrified conservatives on the campaign trail in 1964 on behalf of the Republican nominee, Senator Barry M. Goldwater of Arizona. But Mr. Goldwater lost big, and Mr. Reagan did not win the presidency until 1980. Fourteen years later, he announced he had Alzheimer’s disease. Mr. Nixon ran as Dwight D. Eisenhower’s vice president in 1952, and 1956. He lost the White House to John F. Kennedy in 1960 before winning in 1968 and 1972 (and resigning in 1974). That run draws comparisons to Mr. Clinton’s longevity. Mr. Clinton “wouldn’t like to hear this, but in a lot of ways he’s like Nixon in that raw determination to keep moving forward,” said Kenneth L. Khachigian, a former Nixon aide. The dawning of both Clintons’ careers makes that comparison all the more striking. In 1974, the year before the Clintons married, Hillary Rodham worked for the House committee pursuing the impeachment of Mr. Nixon, and Mr. Clinton fell short as a Democratic congressional candidate seeking to capitalize on the Watergate scandal. Mrs. Clinton approaches her decision to run on firmer ground than any nonincumbent in years. As senator from New York and then secretary of state, she has built a substantial independent standing and appeal. But Mr. Clinton has profoundly shaped her ability, as well as that of any modern Democratic nominee, to compete. He modernized the aging Roosevelt coalition shattered by Mr. Reagan, showing Democrats how to win the White House after a 12-year drought. The economic growth he presided over has produced such nostalgia that Republicans now invoke him to disparage Mr. Obama. “Like Reagan’s, Clinton’s historical significance, his consequence, has become more apparent with the passage of time,” said Richard Norton Smith, founding director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum. Presidents can influence contests for the White House in many ways after they have moved out of it. Mr. Smith, whose book “An Uncommon Man” chronicled Herbert Hoover’s post-presidency, notes that Democrats used Mr. Hoover for decades as a cudgel against Republicans. Yet during the 31 years he lived after returning to private life, Mr. Hoover headed two presidential commissions on the federal government, and the eponymous institution he founded at Stanford University influenced the resurgence of conservatism. On the other side, former President Jimmy Carter, who turns 90 on Wednesday, was a consistent Republican target after his 1980 loss to Mr. Reagan. Mr. Carter has now been an ex-president longer than any in history — surpassing Mr. Hoover’s record — and he spent the decades focusing on human rights and the resolution of international conflicts. He won the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize. Former President George Bush was unpopular enough within the Republican Party when he left office that his own son President George W. Bush kept his political distance. The younger Mr. Bush, himself, has taken up painting. Mr. Clinton still savors life on the big stage and the nuts and bolts of politics. He has courted Reagan Democrats, soccer moms, baby boom yuppies, tech workers and millennials on his own behalf and for his wife. His scorecard, despite scandal and strife during his tenure, remains robust. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll this month showed Mr. Clinton with a 56 percent favorability rating. Mr. Brinkley credited it to “a combination of ambition, will, narcissism and talent.” Paul Begala, a former Clinton aide, cites the lip-biting empathy that Mr. Clinton displays, and that late-night comics once mocked, reasoning that Americans return the apparent concern and affection he has extended to them. The ex-president benefits, too, from simply having served during the first Silicon Valley boom. “Those of us who aren’t Clintonites credit most of it to the fact that a whole new source for our economy was created — and not by him,” Mr. Khachigian said. Mr. Clinton himself has since grown wealthy. Yet even adversaries do not believe that is why he stays in the game. “He’d probably give it all up,” Mr. Khachigian said, “if he could have a permanent microphone and an office in the West Wing.”