👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,213 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: bellaklein
Subject: Re: Joe Thakuria
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:40:26 +0000
wasnt there one the year before. ?
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:22 PM, bellaklein < > wrote:
Attached is the check with backup for the check to Joe in the amount of $2,000 issued on June 24 2014.
Thank you,
Bella
Tel:
On May 27, 2015, at 1:10 PM, > wrote:
I think we sent along 10k as well...Bella can you check?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]>
Subject: Re: Joe Thakuria
Date: Februar 24. 2014 at 4:23:06 PM EST
To: >, Richard Kahn ..c >
give him 10k
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, > wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joseph Thakuria <
Date: February 24, 2014 4:08:44 PM EST
To:
Cc: Rich Kahn
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein
Really?
EFTA00855979
Ok, done (pending approval through Partners/MGH IRB for my formal research study - about 5 weeks
as we discussed).
Can we get a little additional software budget for secondary analyses? At least the $4K worth we would
have gotten with an exome? The rationale for this is so we don't have to completely rely only "black
box" interpretation by Illumina. In my experience, Illumna's genome interpretation has been historically
subpar. Not surprising since they are primarily a next gen DNA sequencing instrumentation company -
not really focused on analyses and genomic analyses software (though they do have their own). It may
be that we don't pull up a lot of extra info with additional software. But we won't know that one way or
the other relying only on Ilumina's interpretation.
Anyway, let me know. The budget/invoice is complete if we all we are going after is one item: a rapid
turnaround whole genome through Illumina for $11,400. I do think this is the best (highest quality)
whole genome you can get for the money but it is disappointing to me that their pricing has been
essentially unchanged for years (the reason I expected this to be in the $5K range). I do think I can find
a whole genome for around $5K (perhaps through CGI) but again I'd question the quality of that
genome. (That was the research rationale for getting 1 from Illumina and 1 from CGI to compare results
if the funding were available for this).
Let me know if this needs any further clarification.
Thanks again,
Joe
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:46 PM, > wrote:
Hi Joe...below is Jeffrey's reply:
lets start and do the full genome with rapid turn around. 11, 400
On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Joseph Thakuria > wrote:
Hi and Rich,
can you forward the following info to Jeffrey?
So when I sent the initial invoice I didn't have the actual whole genome costs through Illumina
which are $9500 for a normal turn around time and $11,400 for "rapid turn around time". The rapid
turn around time isn't necessary in Jeffrey's case. And, in my opinion, if the budget is only $5000, I
think the most bang for his buck (and this is what I would do for myself with only $5000 to spend)
is to get an exome done. I should be able to get this through Ambry and through the same research
protocol we'll be suing for the YPO study participants for $1000. I would then use the remainder to
purchase genome analyses tools (there won't be enough for any servers) to perform secondary
analyses on the exome.
The exome only represents around 1.5% of the genome - but this is the medically most important
part of the genome (at least given our current knowledge) and represents all the coding regions in all
our 20,000+ genes.
If this sounds good to Jeffrey, I'll produce a final budget before the end of the week that specifies
which of the tools we'll be able to get with the remaining $4000. (I need to finish pricing and
EFTA00855980
tallying up features among the 6 I listed to determine which one(s) will get.
This won't of course cover any cellular work or other items in the full invoice but I would still
recommend moving at least some fibroblast cell lines aliquots from the PGP to our new study so we
can work on those when funding from other sources is available.
I would also just throw out there for Jeffrey's consideration that the same ambitious protocol for a
stripped down clinical next generation DNA sequencing laboratory could be pursued with a similar
budget on the commercial side - and I've already been in discussion with others about funding this
effort. Having followed this space since 2005 I can say the timing is very good for this type of
business right now. Again, it hasn't even been more than a year that this technology has transitioned
into clinical care. So if this is something Jeffrey would be interested in pursuing as an investor with
an equity stake, rather than as a philanthropic grant for academic research, that would be another
route for going ahead with the full project that he may be interested in discussing further.
Rich, I'll leave it to you on how you'd like to handle the $5000 invoice. I could receive this as a
lump sum and account for how it is spent. I would expect all of it to be used up before the end of the
summer. We can also arrange it so that as the various vendors (sequencing and software) provide
invoices, your office pays them directly. Either way is fine with me. I don't have a preference.
Thanks and let me know if I can provide any clarifications. Again, I'll follow up with an invoice
capped at $5K before the end of the week (assuming you agree with the above).
Joe Thakuria
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:34 PM, > wrote:
Hello Joe. I have Jeffrey's accountant on this email as well, Rich Kahn . Jeffrey has told Rich he
would like to do a $5000 genetic work up done for the time being. Could you coordinate with
Rich regarding payment/next steps?
Thank you,
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
Sent from my iPhone
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
EFTA00855981
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to j @gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00855982
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
628cc7aa4f5ff4349333bf8096fb22cf0a4516615efaa81fa21917919ffb4570
Bates Number
EFTA00855979
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0