Correct The Record Sunday September 7, 2014 Roundup

podesta-emails 5,880 words email

D6 P17 P22 V11 D1

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *[image: Inline image 1]* *Correct The Record Sunday September 7, 2014 Roundup:* NOTE FROM CTR RESEARCH, FACTS: Secretary Clinton engaged domestic and foreign leaders to secure and extract Americans from Benghazi. Secretary Clinton was fully engaged in locating and extracting Americans from Benghazi that night. As detailed in her book Hard Choices, Clinton spent the night coordinating rescue efforts with the White House, the National Security Council, the American Embassy in Tripoli, and Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf. Additional accounts of that night note that Secretary Clinton coordinated efforts with foreign leaders in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia. *Headlines:* *NPR: “Henry Kissinger's Thoughts On The Islamic State, Ukraine And 'World Order'” <http://www.wbur.org/npr/346114326/henry-kissingers-thoughts-on-the-islamic-state-ukraine-and-world-order>* Henry Kissinger, “I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she'd be a good president. But she'd put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans.” *Washington Post blog: In The Loop: “Did Kissinger endorse Clinton for president? Almost.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/09/07/did-kissinger-endorse-clinton-for-president-almost/>* “Which begs the question, how many friends would it cost Clinton to have Kissinger, reviled by the antiwar movement during the Vietnam War, as an advocate?” *The Atlantic: “Hillary, Elizabeth Warren, and Israel” <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/09/hillary-elizabeth-warren-and-israel/379721/>* “Even if Elizabeth Warren chooses to run (unlikely), she won’t run as a tough-on-Israel liberal. There's just no percentage in it. Hillary knew what she was doing.” *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “Romney: 'No question' I'd be a better candidate than Hillary Clinton” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/216875-romney-no-question-id-be-a-better-candidate-than-hillary>* “Mitt Romney said Sunday that he'd make a better president than Hillary Clinton, although he is not planning on running.” *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Romney on 2016: ‘I’m Not Planning on Running’” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/07/romney-on-2016-im-not-planning-on-running/>* “In his Sunday appearance on Fox, Mr. Romney said there was ‘no question’ in his mind that he would make a better president than Mrs. Clinton — or the person who beat him in 2012, President Barack Obama.” *ThinkProgress: “Rand Paul Decides To Pick A Fight With Hillary Clinton Over Climate Change” <http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/09/07/3564148/paul-clinton-climate-change/>* “Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) decided to pick a fight with Hillary Clinton over climate change on Friday.” *Boston Herald column: Adriana Cohen: “Benghazi truth emerges” <http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/adriana_cohen/2014/09/adriana_cohen_benghazi_truth_emerges>* “They requested air support and military back-up from the State Department — but Hillary Clinton didn’t answer that 3 a.m. phone call. No help came. And good American men lost their lives because of it.” *Articles:* *NPR: “Henry Kissinger's Thoughts On The Islamic State, Ukraine And 'World Order'” <http://www.wbur.org/npr/346114326/henry-kissingers-thoughts-on-the-islamic-state-ukraine-and-world-order>* Henry Kissinger was a Harvard scholar before he became a mover and shaker in the world of foreign policy. And in his new book, World Order, the former secretary of state under Presidents Nixon and Ford gives a historian's perspective on the idea of order in world affairs. Nations are always trying to establish systems to make the world a more orderly place, but they rarely last for long. His book stretches from China under the emperors, Rome surrounded by barbarians and Islam encircled by infidels, to the treaties of Europe and the pivotal positions of Russia and Iran. On current affairs, Kissinger tells NPR's Scott Simon why a conflict with the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, is more manageable than a confrontation with Iran, what he would do about the Islamic State, and what he thinks the best solution is for the crisis in Ukraine. Interview Highlights *On why he views Iran as a "bigger problem than ISIS"* There has come into being a kind of a Shia belt from Tehran through Baghdad to Beirut. And this gives Iran the opportunity to reconstruct the ancient Persian Empire — this time under the Shia label — in the rebuilding of the Middle East that will inevitably have to take place when the new international borders [are] drawn. Because the borders of the settlement of 1919-'20 are essentially collapsing. That gives Iran a very powerful level from a strategic point of view. I consider Iran a bigger problem than ISIS. ISIS is a group of adventurers with a very aggressive ideology. But they have to conquer more and more territory before they can became a strategic, permanent reality. I think a conflict with ISIS — important as it is — is more manageable than a confrontation with Iran. *On what he would do about ISIS* They have cut the throat of an American on television. This is an insult to the United States, which requires that we demonstrate that this is not an act that is free. I would strongly favor a strong attack on ISIS for a period that is related to the murder of the American. Then, we have to go into the long-range problem. I think when we are dealing with a unit like ISIS, we should not get into a position where they can lead us by establishing ground forces. But we should set strategic objectives where we thwart any goal they set themselves, which we should be able to do by superior air power. And then, if we can enlist other countries, or other more local groups to do the ground fighting, we might actually destroy them. *On the "Russian enigma" and what he thinks Putin's Russia wants* The attitude of the West and of Russia towards a crisis like Ukraine is diametrically different. The West is trying to establish the legality of any established border. For Russia, Ukraine is part of the Russian patrimony. A Russian state was created around Kiev about 1,200 years ago. Ukraine itself has been part of Russia for 500 years, and I would say most Russians consider it of Russian patrimony. The ideal solution would be to have a Ukraine like Finland or Austria that can be a bridge between these two rather than an outpost. *Kissinger's reaction to naysayers because of his role during the war in Vietnam, especially the bombing of Cambodia and Laos* They should study what is going on. I think we would find, if you study the conduct of [the military], that the Obama administration has hit more targets on a broader scale than the Nixon administration ever did. And, of course, B-52s have a different bombing pattern. On the other hand, drones are far more deadly because they are much more accurate. And I think the principle is essentially the same. You attack locations where you believe people operate who are killing you. You do it in the most limited way possible. And I bet if one did an honest account, there were fewer civilian casualties in Cambodia than there have been from American drone attacks. The Vietnam War was a great tragedy for that country. And it is now far enough away so that one can study [it] without using the slogans to see what really happened. And I believe you would find — my position was that of the chief of staff of the president — that the decisions that were taken would almost certainly have been taken by those of you who are listening, faced with the same set of problems. And you would have done them with anguish, as we did them with anguish. *On whether he thinks Hillary Clinton would be a good president* I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she'd be a good president. But she'd put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate, because I tend to support the Republicans. ... Yes, I'd be comfortable with her as the president. Transcript SCOTT SIMON, HOST: Henry Kissinger was a scholar before he became a mover and shaker. And in a new book, he traces the idea of order and world affairs - how nations try to establish systems to make the world a more orderly place. It usually doesn't work out that way for long. His new book, "World Order," stretches from China under to the emperors, the treaties of Europe to the pivotal position of Russia and Iran today. We spoke with the former secretary of state last week shortly after news that James Foley - the U.S. journalist - had been beheaded by militants from the Islamic State also known as ISIS. Mr. Kissinger said that in all the crises roiling the world, the U.S. shouldn't lose focus on Iran. HENRY KISSINGER: There have come into being a kind of a Shia-belt from Tehran through Baghdad to Beirut. And this gives Iran the opportunity to reconstruct the ancient Persian Empire, this time under a Shia label. From a geo-strategic point of view, I consider Iran a bigger problem than ISIS. ISIS is a group of adventurers with a very aggressive ideology. But they have to conquer more and more territory before they can become a geo-strategic, permanent reality. I think a conflict with ISIS - important as it is - is more manageable than a confrontation with Iran. SIMON: What would you do about ISIS? KISSINGER: They have cut the throat of an American on television. This is an insult to the United States, which requires that we demonstrate that this is not an act that is free. I would strongly favor a strong attack on ISIS for a period that is related to the murder of the American. Then, we have to go into the long-range problem. I think when we're dealing with a unit like ISIS, we should not get into a position where they can lead us by establishing ground forces. But we should set strategic objectives where we thwart any goal they set themselves, which we should be able to do by superior air power. And then if we can enlist other countries or other more local groups to do the ground fighting, we might actually destroy them. SIMON: Let me ask you about a couple of other areas of the world. You spent a considerable time in this book writing about what you call the Russian enigma. What's your reading of what Vladimir Putin's Russia wants? KISSINGER: The attitude of the West and of Russia towards a crisis like Ukraine is diametrically different. The West is trying to establish the legality of any established border. For Russia, Ukraine is part of the Russian patrimony. A Russian state was created around Kiev about 1,200 years ago. Ukraine itself has been part of Russia for 500 years, and I would say most Russians consider it of Russian patrimony. The ideal solution would be to have a Ukraine like Finland or Austria that can be a bridge between these two rather than an outpost. SIMON: Mr. Kissinger, every time we interview you, we hear from people who object, who say they have no interest in your opinion because of your role during the war in Vietnam, especially the bombing of Cambodia and Laos. How do you answer that? KISSINGER: They should study what is going on. I think we would find, if you study the conduct of guerilla-type wars, that the Obama Administration has hit more targets on a broader scale than the Nixon Administration ever did. SIMON: Is there not, though, a difference between a drone attack and carpet bombing? KISSINGER: Of course. When you - B-52s have a different bombing pattern. On the other hand, drones are far more deadly because they're much more accurate. And I think the principle is essentially the same. You attack locations where you believe people operate who are killing you. You do it in the most limited way possible. And I bet if one did an honest account, there are fewer civilian casualties in Cambodia than there have been from American drone attacks. The Vietnam War was a great tragedy for our country. And it is now far enough away so that one can study without using the slogans to see what's really happened. And I believe you would find - my position was that of the chief of staff of the president - that the decisions that were taken would almost certainly have been taken by those of you who are listening, faced with the same set of problems. And you would have done them with anguish, as we did them with anguish. SIMON: Mr. Kissinger, a future question - do you think Hillary Clinton would be a good president? KISSINGER: I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she'd be a good president. But she'd put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate because I intend to support the Republicans. SIMON: Well, I didn't ask it in a partisan way, just if she were to run and be elected, would you be comfortable with her as president of United States? KISSINGER: Yes, I'd be comfortable with that president. SIMON: Henry Kissinger. His new book - "World Order." Thanks so much for being with us. KISSINGER: You've just lost me. I don't know how many friends. *Washington Post blog: In The Loop: “Did Kissinger endorse Clinton for president? Almost.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/wp/2014/09/07/did-kissinger-endorse-clinton-for-president-almost/>* By Colby Itkowitz September 7, 2014, 12:48 p.m. EDT It’s been a bit of a love fest between former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and Hillary Clinton the past week. They shared a stage at the groundbreaking of the State Department’s new Diplomacy Center, Clinton wrote a glowing review of Kissinger’s new book, and then President Richard Nixon’s foreign policy adviser on Saturday offered an (almost) endorsement for a Clinton presidency. Kissinger, a controversial figure in American diplomatic history, was asked during an NPR interview whether Clinton would make a good president. “I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president,” Kissinger said. “But she’d put me under a great conflict of interest if she were a candidate because I intend to support the Republicans.” NPR reporter Scott Simon asked whether, putting partisan politics aside, Kissinger would be comfortable with a Clinton White House. “Yes, I’d be comfortable with that president,” Kissinger said. But then he added, “You’ve just lost me I don’t know how many friends.” Which begs the question, how many friends would it cost Clinton to have Kissinger, reviled by the antiwar movement during the Vietnam War, as an advocate? This isn’t the first time that Kissinger has heaped praise on Clinton. In 2008, when it was rumored that Barack Obama would pick her as his secretary of state, Kissinger was all in. “She is a lady of great intelligence, demonstrated enormous determination and would be an outstanding appointment,” he said during a speech in India. But liberals, who worry that Clinton is too hawkish on foreign policy, have raised an eyebrow at the presumptive Democratic front-runner’s cuddly relationship with Kissinger. David Corn at Mother Jones described Clinton’s embrace of Kissinger as evidence of “how low she can go” to win the White House. And the former diplomats’ friendship adds fuel to the other end of the political spectrum occupied by libertarian Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Paul is largely anti-intervention and is eager to run for president against Clinton, whom he has dismissed as a “war hawk.” Which leads to another question: If Paul is the GOP nominee against Clinton, will Kissinger still vote Republican? *The Atlantic: “Hillary, Elizabeth Warren, and Israel” <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/09/hillary-elizabeth-warren-and-israel/379721/>* By Jeffery Goldberg September 7, 2014, 9:05 a.m. EDT [Subtitle:] Why Hillary Clinton's hawkish pro-Israel stance won't hurt her, even with the Democratic Party base Shortly after I posted my interview with Hillary Clinton last month, I began hearing from liberal Democrats who were worried that her hawkish comments—on Syria, but especially on the Gaza war—would somehow provoke a primary challenge from her left (these conversations proceeded from the assumption that Clinton is running for president, which is a reasonable assumption). The Democratic Party base, the theory went, would be so offended by Clinton’s vociferous pro-Netanyahu positioning that it would agitate on behalf of a primary challenge. Elizabeth Warren, the populist Massachusetts senator, was the most likely candidate for the role. As a reminder, here is some of what Clinton said about Israel and Gaza: “Israel was attacked by rockets from Gaza. Israel has a right to defend itself. The steps Hamas has taken to embed rockets and command-and-control facilities and tunnel entrances in civilian areas, this makes a response by Israel difficult. Of course Israel, just like the United States, or any other democratic country, should do everything they can possibly do to limit civilian casualties.” And this: “If I were the prime minister of Israel, you’re damn right I would expect to have control over security [on the West Bank], because even if I’m dealing with Abbas, who is 79 years old, and other members of Fatah, who are enjoying a better lifestyle and making money on all kinds of things, that does not protect Israel from the influx of Hamas or cross-border attacks from anywhere else. With Syria and Iraq, it is all one big threat. So Netanyahu could not do this in good conscience.” Tough stuff, and not the sort of thing you would have heard from her publicly when she was yelling at Benjamin Netanyahu on behalf of President Obama for the past several years. After the interview, I came to a few conclusions about these statements: 1. They were made on purpose, as was every statement she made in the interview, including the line that got the most attention: “Great nations need organizing principles, and ‘Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle.” 2. They were made with the knowledge that she faces no serious foreign policy-focused challenge from her left. She does face a more serious and sustained critique from the left on domestic issues, but she felt that going hawkish on foreign policy would be low-risk. 3. They were made with knowledge that there are segments of the pro-Israel community that still mistrust her for kissing Mrs. Arafat a million years ago. 4. She believes what she said. She is just naturally more hawkish than the president she served as secretary of state. I’m now glad to report—only because I’d rather be right than wrong, all things being equal—that Elizabeth Warren has confirmed for us that, on questions related to Israel, Clinton has nothing to fear from her, at least. At a town-hall meeting on Cape Cod last month, Warren answered critics of her vote in favor of a Senate measure to send an additional $225 million in military funding to Israel during the war. Here is a report on the town-hall meeting from the Cape Cod Times: “‘I think the vote was right, and I'll tell you why I think the vote was right,’ [Warren] said. ‘America has a very special relationship with Israel. Israel lives in a very dangerous part of the world, and a part of the world where there aren't many liberal democracies and democracies that are controlled by the rule of law. And we very much need an ally in that part of the world.’ “Warren said Hamas has attacked Israel ‘indiscriminately,’ but with the Iron Dome defense system, the missiles have ‘not had the terrorist effect Hamas hoped for.’ When pressed by another member of the crowd about civilian casualties from Israel's attacks, Warren said she believes those casualties are the ‘last thing Israel wants.’ “‘But when Hamas puts its rocket launchers next to hospitals, next to schools, they're using their civilian population to protect their military assets. And I believe Israel has a right, at that point, to defend itself,’ Warren said, drawing applause.” Even if Elizabeth Warren chooses to run (unlikely), she won’t run as a tough-on-Israel liberal. There's just no percentage in it. Hillary knew what she was doing. *The Hill blog: Ballot Box: “Romney: 'No question' I'd be a better candidate than Hillary Clinton” <http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/216875-romney-no-question-id-be-a-better-candidate-than-hillary>* By Kevin Cirilli September 7, 2014, 9:54 a.m. EDT Mitt Romney said Sunday that he'd make a better president than Hillary Clinton, although he is not planning on running. Romney, the former 2012 Republican presidential candidate, insisted that he's not running for president in 2016. But that didn't stop him from comparing himself to Clinton, the presumed Democratic frontrunner. "Would you make a better president than Hillary Clinton?" Fox's Chris Wallace asked Romney in an interview with "Fox News Sunday." "No question about that in my mind," Romney answered. "Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are two peas in the same pod." Romney also said he'd have made a better president than Barack Obama, too. Romney criticized Clinton and Obama for their foreign policy decisions, particularly their response to the Sept. 12, 2012, attack at a U.S. post in Benghazi, Libya. "This doesn't just land at the feet of the president, it lands at Hillary Clinton as well," Romney said. *Wall Street Journal blog: Washington Wire: “Romney on 2016: ‘I’m Not Planning on Running’” <http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/09/07/romney-on-2016-im-not-planning-on-running/>* By Patrick O’Connor September 7, 2014, 12:16 p.m. EDT Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, threw a little cold water Sunday on the brewing speculation that he will mount a third White House bid in 2016. “I’m not running, I’m not planning on running,” Mr. Romney said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” in response to a question about his future ambitions. Mr. Romney’s name continues to surface in speculation about which candidates will throw their hat in the ring in 2016 for the Republican presidential nomination. Some polls show him leading the potential field. Top donors are searching for a polished pick with the stature to run against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the odds-on favorite in the prospective Democratic field. Many of these Republicans view Mr. Romney as something of a fallback choice, if former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush opts not to run. In his Sunday appearance on Fox, Mr. Romney said there was “no question” in his mind that he would make a better president than Mrs. Clinton — or the person who beat him in 2012, President Barack Obama. The 2012 Republican nominee also sought to cast doubts about Mrs. Clinton’s foreign-policy bona fides, linking the potential candidate to Mr. Obama, whose support is sagging in most public-opinion polls, particularly for his handling for foreign policy. In his appearance Sunday, Mr. Romney didn’t entirely rule out a bid, but he didn’t leave the door open very wide either. “My time has come and gone,” he said. “I had the opportunity. I ran and didn’t win.” *Politico: “Luis Gutiérrez: Martin O’Malley ‘champion’ of immigration” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/luis-gutierrez-martin-omalley-immigration-110666.html>* By Maggie Haberman September 6, 2014, 4:37 p.m. EDT Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.), the loudest congressional voice on immigration reform and critic of the White House over deportations, on Saturday held up likely 2016 Democratic presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley as a reliable ally and champion on the issue. Speaking at a campaign rally for Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill), Gutiérrez referenced Obama’s decision to delay executive action on immigration, which was revealed just a few hours earlier. Describing Durbin as a “champion” of Hispanics at the rally in Chicago for the Senator’s re-election campaign, Gutiérrez added, “There’s another wonderful, wonderful champion of our community, and he’s with us. And I have the distinct honor and pleasure of introducing him. It’s Governor O’Malley.” O’Malley, the governor of Maryland, recently criticized the White House for deportations of children who’ve illegally crossed the border escaping violence in their own countries, saying they would meet “certain death.” “He wasn’t afraid to challenge the president to implement a more humane approach to the refugee crisis,” said Gutiérrez, who has said he would support Hillary Clinton if she runs for president. “He doesn’t just talk, he walks the walk. His state of Maryland has cared for more unaccompanied children per capita than any other state in the United States of America.” He also singled out O’Malley’s work on drivers licenses for immigrants and the state version of the DREAM Act, which has stalled in Congress. An O’Malley aide provided audio of the event. Gutiérrez is a crucial validator with Hispanic voters, a fast-growing voting bloc and a critical one in a national campaign. *ThinkProgress: “Rand Paul Decides To Pick A Fight With Hillary Clinton Over Climate Change” <http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/09/07/3564148/paul-clinton-climate-change/>* By Jeff Spross September 7, 2014, 1:24 p.m. EDT Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) decided to pick a fight with Hillary Clinton over climate change on Friday. The sticking point was a speech the former Secretary of State gave on Thursday to the National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas. Her remarks covered a wide range of issues, in particular foreign policy. But she also zeroed in on the need for the U.S. to tackle climate change, calling it “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face.” That was the part Paul pounced on. “For her to be out there saying that the biggest threat to our safety and to our well-being is climate change, I think, goes to the heart of the matter or whether or not she has the wisdom to lead the country, which I think it’s obvious that she doesn’t,” Paul said in a Friday appearance on Fox News, while discussing ISIS — the Islamic terrorist that’s seized territory in parts of Iraq and Syria. “I don’t think we really want a commander-in-chief who’s battling climate change instead of terrorism,” Paul continued. Hillary Clinton is widely considered the Democrats’ main contender for the presidency in 2016, while Paul is one of several Republican front-runners. In particular, the Kentucky Senator has distinguished himself as a voice of skepticism regarding American military intervention abroad, a position that has both won him accolades and put him in the uncomfortable position of embodying one side in a growing rift within the GOP over foreign policy. That side also appears to be losing, as polling of Republicans across the country suggests a convergence is happening in favor of foreign policy hawkishness . Recently, Paul himself has taken the rise of ISIS as an opportunity to push back at his reputation as an isolationist. The trouble for Paul is that, by all accounts, Clinton’s characterization of climate change is perfectly sound. Multiple environmental groups — including the League of Conservation Voters and NextGen Climate — shot back at Paul, many of them pointing out that the Defense Department’s own Quadrennial Defense Review in 2014 pointed to climate change as a “significant challenge for the United States.” “The pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world,” the report explained. “These effects are threat multipliers that will aggravate stressors abroad such as poverty, environmental degradation, political instability, and social tensions — conditions that can enable terrorist activity and other forms of violence.” A 2014 study by a panel of 16 retired three- and four-star American generals and admirals also looked into the national security threats posed by climate change and concluded it is “a catalyst for conflict.” And Rebecca Leber noted in The New Republic that the Pentagon’s deputy assistant secretary of Defense for strategy and force development even explained the situation to the Senate panel Paul himself sits on. “The effects of the changing climate affect the full range of Department activities, including plans, operations, training, infrastructure, acquisition, and longer-term investments,” Daniel Chiu told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in July. “By taking a proactive, flexible approach to assessment, analysis, and adaptation, the Department can keep pace with the impacts of changing climate patterns, minimize effects on the Department, and continue to protect our national security interests.” Beyond national security threats, the threats posed by climate change to Americans’ well-being and economic security are also striking. A recent national report entitled “Risky Business” — arguably the most comprehensive analysis done yet on the economic risks of climate change — noted that by 2100 there is a one-in-twenty chance climate change will reduce national labor productivity by three percent. “A decline of three percent in labor productivity nationally is like losing all of Connecticut’s labor force,” Kate Gordon, the study’s executive director, told ThinkProgress. A big part of that reduction would come from heat: within the same time frame, the eastern half of the country could begin seeing a few days a year where heat and humidity combine to such a degree that it literally becomes life-threatening for people to be outside for an extended period. The latest National Climate Assessment, meanwhile, projects rising heat waves, more droughts, more floods, and even more insidious effects like ocean acidification for every region of the U.S. — all of which in turn threaten the stability of industries and infrastructure around the country. If current projections for sea level rise pan out, it could wipe much of South Florida, including the city of Miami, right off the map by 2100. In short, if climate change is not “the most consequential” challenge facing America, it’s hard to imagine what issue could possibly qualify. And polling also indicates most Americans are aware of the problem, with majorities of voters consistently labeling climate change a serious threat and saying government should move decisively to deal with it. That stance is not uniformly distributed, however: Democrats, along with Latinos, and other minorities, tend to register the most concern with global warming. But Republicans and Tea Party voters tend to be the most skeptical. They’ll also be the voters Rand Paul will need to court in 2016. NOTE FROM CTR RESEARCH, FACTS: Secretary Clinton engaged domestic and foreign leaders to secure and extract Americans from Benghazi. Secretary Clinton was fully engaged in locating and extracting Americans from Benghazi that night. As detailed in her book Hard Choices, Clinton spent the night coordinating rescue efforts with the White House, the National Security Council, the American Embassy in Tripoli, and Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf. Additional accounts of that night note that Secretary Clinton coordinated efforts with foreign leaders in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia. *Boston Herald column: Adriana Cohen: “Benghazi truth emerges” <http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/adriana_cohen/2014/09/adriana_cohen_benghazi_truth_emerges>* By Adriana Cohen September 7, 2014 Three CIA military contractors who were in the fight for their lives when our consulate in Benghazi was attacked on Sept. 11, 2012, gave a riveting first-hand account in a bombshell interview with Fox News anchor Bret Baier of what really happened that night. U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans — including Winchester native Glen Doherty — lost their lives in the brutal attack by Islamist terrorists who launched RPGs, mortars and heavy fire into both the consulate and nearby annex — for 13 hours — while the White House and State Department ignored their cries for help. When our consulate was attacked, these three CIA first responders wanted to immediately rush over to the compound to rescue Stevens and other personnel but say they were repeatedly told to wait and “stand down” for nearly 30 minutes by their CIA base chief, who was with them that deadly night. Their team leader was a CIA official who got direct orders from Washington to wait multiple times. This long delay cost Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith their lives. Baier’s report is based on a book coming out Tuesday, “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi,” written by Boston University journalism professor Mitchell Zuckoff along with the CIA contractors. BAIER: If I gave you that 30 minutes back, would Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith be alive today? KRIS PARONTO (CIA contractor): Yes, they would still be alive. BAIER: You in on that? JOHN TIEGEN (CIA contractor): I strongly believe if we would have left immediately, they would still be alive today. Not only did the delay cost two Americans their lives, but these three CIA security contractors and two others, Tyrone Woods and Doherty, were still fighting for their own lives as the attack continued. They requested air support and military back-up from the State Department — but Hillary Clinton didn’t answer that 3 a.m. phone call. No help came. And good American men lost their lives because of it. The Obama Administration — of course — denies they told anybody at the CIA annex to “stand down.” It’s no surprise they’ve been playing word games on what “language” they used to order the CIA security team to wait. Former President Bill Clinton — when caught in a sex scandal which led to his impeachment — spliced words during the investigation saying, “It depends what the meaning of ‘is’ is.” With an ongoing congressional Benghazi investigation and upcoming midterm elections, the White House and their spokesmen are doing the same. And America’s not buying it. They know a cover-up when they see one. Prior to the Sept. 11 attack, Obama was selling the phony narrative that terrorism was “on the run.” So instead of admitting he was wrong when Islamist terrorists attacked our consulate, his administration made up the phony story that protesters upset by a video attacked our consulate and murdered these brave Americans. And then they went into cover-up mode. They put politics first and violated the “leave no man behind” military code. And with a complicit mainstream media they got away with it, and Obama got re-elected. Politics and personal career ambitions should never trump human life. But in the Obama/Clinton regime, it does. My heart goes out to the victims’ families. *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · September 9 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the DSCC at her Washington home (DSCC <https://d1ly3598e1hx6r.cloudfront.net/sites/dscc/files/uploads/9.9.14%20HRC%20Dinner.pdf> ) · September 12 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines a DGA fundraiser ( Twitter <https://twitter.com/amychozick/status/507209428274143234>) · September 14 – Indianola, IA: Sec. Clinton headlines Sen. Harkin’s Steak Fry (LA Times <http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-tom-harkin-clinton-steak-fry-20140818-story.html> ) · September 15 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics Conference (CRF <http://www.crf.org/tct/agenda/keynote-address>) · September 15 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton speaks at Legal Services Corp. 40th Anniversary (Twitter <https://twitter.com/AP_Ken_Thomas/status/507549332846178304>) · September 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton headlines a 9/11 Health Watch fundraiser (NY Daily News <http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/hillary-clinton-mark-9-11-anniversary-nyc-fundraiser-responders-kin-blog-entry-1.1926372> ) · September 19 – Washington, DC: Sec. Clinton fundraises for the DNC with Pres. Obama (CNN <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/27/politics/obama-clinton-dnc/index.html>) · October 2 – Miami Beach, FL: Sec. Clinton keynotes the CREW Network Convention & Marketplace (CREW Network <http://events.crewnetwork.org/2014convention/>) · October 6 – Ottawa, Canada: Sec. Clinton speaks at Canada 2020 event (Ottawa Citizen <http://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-speaking-in-ottawa-oct-6> ) · October 13 – Las Vegas, NV: Sec. Clinton keynotes the UNLV Foundation Annual Dinner (UNLV <http://www.unlv.edu/event/unlv-foundation-annual-dinner?delta=0>) · October 14 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton keynotes salesforce.com Dreamforce conference (salesforce.com <http://www.salesforce.com/dreamforce/DF14/highlights.jsp#tuesday>) · October 28 – San Francisco, CA: Sec. Clinton fundraises for House Democratic women candidates with Nancy Pelosi (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-nancy-pelosi-110387.html?hp=r7> ) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>)