📄 Extracted Text (596 words)
RECEIVED
SEP 22 2010
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
ALAN GIFFORD D/B/A BLESSED
TRUCKING CASE NO. ST-09-CV-0000091
ACTION FOR: DEBT - CIVIL
VS
LSJ. LLC
LAFAYETTE CONTRACTORS, LLC
WILLIAM ROWLES
LANCE GALLOWAY
Defendant
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF
ORDER
TO: AMOS W. CARTY, JR., ESQ.
DENISE FRANCOIS. ESQ.
Please take notice that on September 20, 2010 a(n) ORDER dated
September 16, 2010 was entered by the Clerk in the above-entitled matter.
Dated: September 20. 2010
Venetia H. Velazquez. Esq.
Clerk of the Court
KHAULA FRETT
COURT CLERK II
EFTA00728634
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT THE VIRGIN ISLA
NDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
ALAN GIFFORD cUbia BLESSED TRUCKING,
)
)
Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. ST-09-CV-91
v. )
)
LSJ, LLC, LAFAYETTE CONTRACTORS, LLC, )
)
WILLIAM ROWLES and LANCE GALLOWAY,
)
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on February 20, 2009; Defendant
Lafayette filed a Motion to
Dismiss on March 18, 2010, because the agreement between
the parties contains an arbitration
provision; and Plaintiff opposed the dismissal on April 7, 2010.
By Memorandum Opinion and
Order dated June 4, 2009, the Court denied the Motion to Dism
iss without prejudice and stayed
proceedings so that the parties could submit this matter to arbitration.
On April 19, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff moved to withdraw under an inacc
urate caption,
based upon Plaintiffs failure to cooperate in arbitration; and, by Order
dated April 27, 2010, the
Court directed that counsel for Plaintiff resubmit the motion to withdraw in prope
r form and
directed the parties advise the Cowl why the arbitration had not been accomplishe
d. Both
Defendant Lafayette and Plaintiff submitted responses representing to the
Court that the arbitration
had not gone forward due to the complete failure of Plaintiff to prosecute the arbitr
ation. On May
11, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff renewed the motion to withdraw under a proper caption.
By Order
dated May 10, 2010, the Court directed the parties to advise the Court of the status of arbitr
ation by
July 15, 2010.
EFTA00728635
Gifford v. LSJ, LLC, et al.
Case No. ST-09-CV-91
Order, September 16, 2010
Page 2 of 2
By Informative Motion dated September 8, 2010, counsel again advised the Court that
arbitration had not occurred due to the failure of Plaintiff to further prosecute this action. Simply
put, Plaintiff cannot continue to impede the progress of this case through his inaction in the face
of
clear Orders of this Court requiring his participation in arbitration. The Court being advised in the
premises; it is hereby
ORDERED that the STAY previously entered herein is LIFTED; and it is
ORDERED that the Court's previous Order dated June 4, 2009, denying Defendant's
Motion to Dismiss without prejudice is VACATED; and it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
prosecution pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and it is
ORDERED that the parties shall each bear their own attorney's fees and costs, and it is
ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be directed to counsel for the parties, and counsel
for Plaintiff shall cause a copy thereof to be served on Plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt, and
file proof of service thereof with the Court.
Dated: September 16, 2010.
HON.-RICFIAEL L SION:
ATTEST: Venetia H. Velazquez, Esq. JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR CO VItte
Clerk of the Court / OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ..t.t .
TRUE COP: 7
CERTIFIED A
bYt'at
Rosalie Griffith
Court Clerk Supervisor 9 , Date:
By:
EFTA00728636
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
64227c83124e46b4d6c4a363ed053cf623e0baeea6ceee9cc55a7dbfdcd8c4b9
Bates Number
EFTA00728634
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0