podesta-emails
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=5a6T
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Small point I know but in the Maddow interview she did say, seemingly about
DOMA & Don't Ask don't tell -
" So I am not in any way excusing them, but I am explaining it."
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:57 PM, Tony Carrk <[email protected]> wrote:
And also for awareness for everyone to have, attached are HRC’s comments on
DOMA Carter from my team put together.
*From:* Dan Schwerin [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 25, 2015 6:56 PM
*To:* Amanda Renteria <[email protected]>
*Cc:* Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>; Karen Finney <
[email protected]>; Maya Harris <[email protected]>;
Heather Stone <[email protected]>; Robby Mook <
[email protected]>; Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>;
Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Brian Fallon <
[email protected]>; Kristina Schake <[email protected]>;
Marlon Marshall <[email protected]>; Tony Carrk <
[email protected]>; Brynne Craig <[email protected]>; Sally
Marx <[email protected]>; Teddy Goff <[email protected]>;
John Podesta <[email protected]>; Christina Reynolds <
[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: one chain on DOMA
I think everyone agrees we shouldn't restate her argument. Question is
whether she's going to agree to explicitly disavow it. And I doubt it.
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Amanda Renteria <[email protected]>
wrote:
There is no way we have friends to back us up on her interpretation. This
is a major problem if we revisit her argument like this. It's better to do
nothing than to re-state this although she is going to get a question
again.
Working w Dominic now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:34 PM, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm not saying double down or ever say it again. I'm just saying that she's
not going to want to say she was wrong about that, given she and her
husband believe it and have repeated it many times. Better to reiterate
evolution, opposition to DOMA when court considered it, and forward looking
stance.
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:28 PM, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
wrote:
Jumping on a call with the kitchen cabinet now to give them an update. Will
turn to this ASAP.
The most recent Blade article has Elizabeth Birch quoted as saying there
was no amendment threat in 1996. Hilary Rosen has already tweeted the same.
I'll ask on the call, but my sense is that there aren't many friends who
will back us up on the point. That's why I'm urging us to back off as much
as we can there.
More soon.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'd welcome specific edits. I'm fine not mentioning WJC if that's
problematic, but my two cents is that you're not going to get her to
disavow her explanation about the constitutional amendment and this
exercise will be most effective if it provides some context and then goes
on offense.
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:15 PM, Karen Finney <[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
If the criticism is that she has said before and reiterated on Friday then
hit by Bernie yesterday is t that the context?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 25, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
Sorry, on phone so focused more on overall thoughts than line edits. Can
call you directly if any of this is unclear. Sending to all so people can
react, push back, etc.
I originally flagged HRC's Maddow remarks as potentially problematic in
part because her wording closely linked her to two unfavorable policies of
the past even as no one in the community was asking her to "own" them.
Given that, my recommendation would be to make this statement about just
her, her evolution, and her record -- not bring in WJC.
Relatedly, if we release a statement tonight, it will very clearly be in
response to the Maddow interview. To the extent we can, I advocate for
owning that so that we can clean this up completely, rightly position her
as a champion of LGBT issues, and make sure we move on from any discussion
of looming amendments or her being involved in passing either DADT or DOMA.
Without getting into the weeds, can we say that the broader point is that
the country is in a different place now on LGBT issues -- and thank
goodness it is -- and that she's so happy each policy has been placed in
the dustbin of history?
Last thought: I have raised this a few times to a smaller number of people
on this thread but will flag this for the larger group as well. At Keene
State College, she specifically cited friends playing a part in her
evolution, which we echo here. That's fine, IMO, and quite believable. But
if I were a reporter and wanted to keep the evolution story alive, I would
start asking which friends she was talking to and ask us to provide them.
Not a problem per se, but I think it is worth flagging now so we aren't
caught by surprise later.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>
wrote:
This is a little long, but see what you think. Tried to 1) place this in a
context of 'asked and answered,' 2) point to how they've both forthrightly
explained their evolution, 3) cite her positive LGBT record, 4) get in a
little dig at Sanders for being so backwards looking.
STATEMENT
In 2013, when the Supreme Court was considering whether to uphold the
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Bill and I explained publicly how and why
we became strong supporters of marriage equality. Bill, who signed DOMA
nearly twenty years ago after an overwhelming vote in Congress, called the
law a discriminatory vestige of a less tolerant America and urged the Court
to strike it down. I added my voice in support of marriage equality
“personally and as a matter of policy and law.” As I said then, LGBT
Americans are full and equal citizens and they deserve the full and equal
rights of citizenship. Like so many others, my personal views have been
shaped over time by people I have known and loved, by my experience
representing our nation on the world stage, my devotion to law and human
rights, and the guiding principles of my faith. That’s why, as a Senator,
I pushed for laws that would extend protections to the LGBT community in
the workplace and that would make violence towards LGBT individuals a hate
crime. And as Secretary of State, I put LGBT rights on the global agenda
and told the world that “gay rights are human rights and human rights are
gay rights.” In my speech last night in Iowa, I didn’t look back to the
America of the past, I looked forward to the America we need to build
together. I pledged to fight for LGBT Americans who, despite all our
progress, in many places can still get married on Saturday and fired on
Monday just because of who they are and who they love. In this campaign
and as President, I will keep fighting for equality and opportunity for
every American.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
wrote:
+Amanda's work account.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Maya Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
From Richard:
Since I was asked on Friday about the Defense of Marriage Act in an
interview on MSNBC, I've checked with people who were involved then to make
sure I had all my facts right. It turns out I was mistaken and the effort
to pass a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage came some
years later. The larger point I was trying to make about DOMA, however, is
still true. It was neither proposed nor supported by anyone in the Clinton
administration at the time. It was an effort by the Republicans in Congress
to distract attention from the real issues facing the country by using gay
marriage, which had very little support then, as a wedge issue in the
election. The legislation passed by overwhelming veto-proof margins in both
houses of Congress and President Clinton signed it with serious
reservations he expressed at the time. Luckily the country has evolved way
beyond this in the last 20 years and most Americans, including the Supreme
Court, now embrace LGBT equality. We are a better country for it. Although
there is much work that remains, and I'm eager to help advance the day when
we are all truly equal.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
wrote:
+ JP's personal email
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
wrote:
Here is what Gautam put together to be helpful:
"I'm not my husband. I understand why he believed that was the right thing
to do at the time, but obviously I wish it had gone differently. Look,
we've all come along way since the 90s and I'm proud to have been a part of
an Administration that has made it possible for gay troops to serve openly
and loving gay couples to get married. I'm also proud of MY record as
Secretary of State. I think the community knows I will be the ally they
deserve."
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>
wrote:
This WJC op-Ed may be helpful:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bill-clinton-its-time-to-overturn-doma/2013/03/07/fc184408-8747-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html
Bill Clinton: It’s time to overturn DOMA
*The writer is the 42nd president of the United States.*
*I*n 1996, I signed the Defense of Marriage Act. Although that was only 17
years ago, it was a very different time. In no state in the union was
same-sex marriage recognized, much less available as a legal right, but
some were moving in that direction. Washington, as a result, was swirling
with all manner of possible responses, some quite draconian. As a
bipartisan group of former senators stated in their March 1 amicus brief to
the Supreme Court, many supporters of the bill known as DOMA believed that
its passage “would defuse a movement to enact a constitutional amendment
banning gay marriage, which would have ended the debate for a generation or
more.” It was under these circumstances that DOMA came to my desk, opposed
by only 81 of the 535 members of Congress.
On March 27, DOMA will come before the Supreme Court
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2012/12/07/the-supreme-court-takes-up-doma/>,
and the justices must decide whether it is consistent with the principles
of a nation that honors freedom, equality and justice above all, and is
therefore constitutional. As the president who signed the act into law, I
have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and, in
fact, incompatible with our Constitution.
Because Section 3 of the act defines marriage as being between a man and a
woman, same-sex couples who are legally married in nine states and the
District of Columbia are denied the benefits of more than a thousand
federal statutes and programs available to other married couples. Among
other things, these couples cannot file their taxes jointly, take unpaid
leave to care for a sick or injured spouse or receive equal family health
and pension benefits as federal civilian employees. Yet they pay taxes,
contribute to their communities and, like all couples, aspire to live in
committed, loving relationships, recognized and respected by our laws.
When I signed the bill, I included a statement
<http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/scotts/ftp/wpaf2mc/clinton.html> with
the admonition that “enactment of this legislation should not, despite the
fierce and at times divisive rhetoric surrounding it, be understood to
provide an excuse for discrimination.” Reading those words today, I know
now that, even worse than providing an excuse for discrimination, the law
is itself discriminatory. It should be overturned.
We are still a young country, and many of our landmark civil rights
decisions are fresh enough that the voices of their champions still echo,
even as the world that preceded them becomes less and less familiar. We
have yet to celebrate the centennial of the 19th Amendment, but a society
that denied women the vote would seem to us now not unusual or
old-fashioned but alien. I believe that in 2013 DOMA and opposition to
marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society.
Americans have been at this sort of a crossroads often enough to recognize
the right path. We understand that, while our laws may at times lag behind
our best natures, in the end they catch up to our core values. One hundred
fifty years ago, in the midst of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln
concluded a message to Congress by posing the very question we face today:
“It is not ‘Can any of us imagine better?’ but ‘Can we all do better
<http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29503>?’ ”
The answer is of course and always yes. In that spirit, I join with the
Obama administration, the petitioner Edith Windsor
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/edie-windsors-fight-for-same-sex-marriage-rights-continues-even-after-partners-death/2012/07/19/gJQARguhwW_story.html>,
and the many other dedicated men and women who have engaged in this
struggle for decades in urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Defense of
Marriage Act.
On Oct 25, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Kate Offerdahl <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi all - we are going to do 4:30.
Those here at the Hilton can take the call from the staff room.
Call-In: 718-441-3763, no pin
On Oct 25, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Heather Stone <[email protected]>
wrote:
Looping in Kate. She is going to get it scheduled.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
wrote:
All times are good for me.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Heather Stone <[email protected]>
wrote:
Sounds like tony can do 4:15? Can others? If not I could do anytime before
5:15 or after 6.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote:
Adding Dominic.
Agree--let's get our people on a call and push back
I'm also tied up for next few hours @ finance stuff. But let's get this
moving.
On Oct 25, 2015, at 3:48 PM, Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Adding Tony, who recalls this from ’08 when she made a similar argument.
We did not turn up much to support idea that alternative was a
constitutional amendment.
Also adding Schwerin. I think we should pull her statements around the
time she embraced marriage equality and place greatest emphasis on the fact
that she fully acknowledges that she evolved.
I’m on calls next two hours but Maya has my proxy.
*From:* Jennifer Palmieri [mailto:[email protected]
<[email protected]>]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 25, 2015 3:46 PM
*To:* Brian Fallon <[email protected]>; John Podesta <
[email protected]>; Robby Mook <[email protected]>; Kristina
Schake <[email protected]>; Maya Harris <[email protected]>;
Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>; Marlon Marshall <
[email protected]>; Heather Stone <[email protected]>
*Subject:* one chain on DOMA
Think all of us are getting incoming from friends in LGBT community about
DOMA comments.
HuffPo has reached out to us. I heard from Socarides that NYT was doing
something.
I have no understanding of the issue – but clear this has a head of steam.
Brian can put a statement out, but policy and political need to tell us
what you want us to do.
I would suggest a conference call with relevant parties for how we are
going to handle all around – press, groups, politics. I have a bad
schedule for rest of day and may not be able to be on such a call but
don’t think I am needed. We just need guidance and then on political end
think we need a plan for how to hose down anxious friends.
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
--
Dominic Lowell
LGBT Outreach Director | Hillary for America
661.364.5186
[email protected]
<HRC DOMA.DOCX>
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
66dbd924661d6f70c479028aa6980db3b90d100a85b0ace6d49a4ebc9c70aa94
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email
Comments 0